Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Firm’s liquidation raises new fears about mine restoration scheme

28 Sep 2026 4 minute read
Ffos-y-Fran. Photo Droneski Imaging @Shutterstock.com

Martin Shipton

Fresh fears have been raised about the restoration of Wales’ biggest opencast coal mine after another company owned by the businessman who ran the mine was put into compulsory liquidation by Britain’s tax authority.

HMRC secured a High Court winding-up order against Jackson Properties Ltd, whose sole director is David Lewis. The firm owed an undisclosed amount in unpaid tax.

Its most recently filed accounts, for the 12 months to July 2024, showed it had debts totalling £344,987. But with land and buildings valued at £293,530 and debts owed to it of £81,113, the company was said to have net assets of £29,656. However, the granting of the winding-up order suggests the accounts painted an over-optimistic picture of the firm’s prospects.

Mr Lewis is also the sole director of Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, which operated the Ffos-y-fran mine near Merthyr Tydfil and is legally responsible for restoring the land occupied by the mine.

In 2024, the Senedd’s Climate Change, Environment and Infrastructure Committee published a report that described the “epic mismanagement” of the Ffos-y-fran mine at Merthyr Tydfil, saying nothing similar must be allowed to happen in any community in Wales.

The licence to extract coal from Ffos-y-fran expired in September 2022, but local residents reported that the mine continued operating illegally for many months afterwards, before the site closed in November 2023.

In 2025, Nation.Cymru revealed how Mr Lewis had a conviction for defrauding a bank of £88,000 to fund his gambling addiction and how he had assaulted an elderly solicitor outside his Newport office.

According to the latest accounts of Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, around £86.4m has been earmarked for the restoration of the mine. However, the firm submitted a restoration plan to Merthyr Tydfil council that was far more modest than had been expected.

The diminished plan would leave three coal tips in place, with the company warning that it had “insufficient funds” to deliver the far more extensive plan previously agreed to restore the landscape.

Under the scaled-down proposals, it would seek to reduce the height of one coal tip and leave two others in place.

In April 2026, the Welsh Government “called in” the scaled-down restoration scheme, meaning it, rather than Merthyr Tydfil council, will decide whether to grant planning permission.

At the time, Chris and Alyson Austin, who live near the mine and have long campaigned against its continued operation, welcomed the Welsh Government’s decision.

“We are really, really pleased,” said Mrs Austin.

“We’ve always felt the local authority lacked the capacity or resources to deal with a complex and controversial plan of this nature.”

Remediation

We emailed Mr Lewis, stating that we were putting together a story based on the compulsory liquidation of Jackson Properties Ltd on the application of HMRC, pointing out that this had increased concerns about his willingness and ability to pay for the remediation of Ffos-y-fran.

We noted that, on the day before the winding-up order was granted, a charge on Jackson Properties’ assets was imposed by Gwent Holdings Ltd. That company owns Ffos-y-fran, and its sole director is Mr Lewis’s wife, Jane. We asked why the charge had been imposed and how much Jackson Properties owed to HMRC.

We also noted that, in the most recent accounts for Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, the company that operated the mine, the amount set aside for restoration now stands at £86.4m. A note on page 25 of the accounts states: “The £10.6m utilised during the year includes significant cost of plant hire including the cost of under-utilised plant which was hired but not fully engaged”.

Detail

We asked Mr Lewis to explain this in greater detail and to outline what restoration work had been undertaken for the £10.6m spent.

We also asked where the approximately £86.4m was located: was it securely held in a bank account or merely a notional amount for accounting purposes?

We asked him how confident he was that the proposed slimmed-down restoration scheme for Ffos-y-fran would be approved.

Mr Lewis did not respond.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Fish Face
Fish Face
14 days ago

The £86M has been loaned out to other group companies, Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd has publicly stated that it has no intention of paying any more for restoration than is in the Escrow account – the paltry amount of £14m that was required by the planning permission and they had to be taken to court to secure that. This is despite their audited annual accounts (which are always filed late) saying that they will pay the full amount and giving them tax relief on the same. This is the type of neo-liberalism that has destroyed our environment and is being… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
14 days ago

The terms of the escrow agreement (amount set aside for restoration) was set out by the previous Welsh Government under Labour. It specified that the fund be held by Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council. How much is this fund, and what arrangements have been made for restoration? Most of the site was previously a coal tip.

jeff Williams
jeff Williams
14 days ago
Reply to  Brychan

We have in this Country very legal minded highly paid people, In 1996 on the former Opencast site near Bridgend the owners of that site, walk away from their obligation to restore that site. Where are top legal people to sort out these crooks.

Fish Face
Fish Face
14 days ago

The Escrow account is £15m but the restoration costs are probably now more like £125m, £90m has been “Provided” in the accounts but the money has been loaned to other group companies never to be seen again. Planning permission was granted on the guise that it was a restoration project paid for from the mining profits but in reality they have dug a massive big toxic hole and left the tax payers to clean it up, same as happened with countless other mines in Wales and same with Monsanto. Same as happened with Kilvey Hill during the copper industry and… Read more »

jeff Williams
jeff Williams
13 days ago
Reply to  Fish Face

Hope fully when the public wake up to the fact, that Free masons still play a active part in our society.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.