Government’s aid cuts will threaten UK national security, say MPs
Sir Keir Starmer’s plans to increase defence spending by cutting overseas aid will undermine Britain’s national security, a parliamentary committee has said.
MPs raised concerns in a new report that slashing the development budget will “continue to lead to unrest and further crises in the future” and will have “devastating consequences” across the world.
The Commons’ International Development Committee (IDC) said hiking defence spending “at the expense of the world’s most vulnerable” would threaten not only the UK’s soft power “but also its national security”.
In February, the Prime Minister unveiled plans to reduce aid spending to 0.3% of national income to fund the biggest rise in defence spending since the Cold War.
The cut followed the previous Tory government’s move to slash the development budget to 0.5% of national income from 0.7%.
Humanitarian assistance
In a report published on Wednesday, the IDC said development minister Baroness Chapman had repeatedly stressed protection for humanitarian assistance spending in letters to the committee, with a promise that Britain “will remain a leading actor”.
But it added: “Whilst the committee are glad that humanitarian spending on those in desperate need of aid will be prioritised, particularly in the regions of Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan, we are concerned that slashing development aid will continue to lead to unrest and further crises in the future, presenting a threat to UK security.”
The committee warned that repeated cuts to aid in recent years had not only disrupted programme delivery and limited the long-term value for money of Foreign Office work but “harmed” Britain’s global reputation.
Such instability also undermines trust with partners and risks worse outcomes for those most in need, the cross-party group of MPs said.
It concluded: “The UK’s planned reduction of ODA (official development assistance) from 0.5% to 0.3% of gross national income will have devastating consequences across the world.
“The committee recognises that increased defence spending is needed and is to be welcomed.
“However, to do this at the expense of the world’s most vulnerable undermines not only the UK’s soft power, but also its national security.”
Value for money
The committee also expressed disappointment in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office’s approach to value for money, which it said the department currently defines in terms of value to the taxpayer, not improving the lives of those in poverty.
IDC chairwoman and Labour MP Sarah Champion warned the department must take action to shift its focus, as well as to “wipe out waste” and ensure money is spent on making a difference.
While the FCDO is “broadly hanging on” to the reputation of the former Department for International Development as a “world leader” in value for money it “must make urgent improvements”, she said.
“The savage aid cuts announced this year are already proving to be a tragic error that will cost lives and livelihoods, undermine our international standing and ultimately threaten our national security. They must be reversed,” Ms Champion said.
“Value for money is critical to making the most of a shrinking aid budget. While this report finds some positives, the Government must take urgent action to wipe out waste and ensure the money we are still spending makes a genuine difference.”
Boost defence
The Prime Minister earlier this year defended the cuts in order to boost defence as “necessary for the protection of our country” amid fierce criticism from aid organisations which argued the move was short-sighted.
Timothy Ingram, head of advocacy at WaterAid, echoed the IDC’s concerns, arguing that aid when delivered effectively is “an investment in a safer and more prosperous world”.
“The UK Government’s decision to cut the aid budget was one that defied both logic and humanity,” he said.
He said it would have “long-term consequences for the UK’s stability, economy and global standing.”
The FCDO has been contacted for comment.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
National security is the first duty of any government, I wonder where those committee members would like the cuts to be made otherwise.
There is also the impact on reputation.
Belgium since 1923 has supported the economic development of Sub-Saharan Africa through subsiding Sabena’ / Brussels Airlines flight network – then raised their global profile and lots of well-paid jobs related to NATO etc are in Brussels.
Wales must network internationally / share best practices such as Future Generations Act with other nations to ensure Wales is known for supporting other regions and Starmer is in the news talking about small boats.
Belgium like many ex-colonial European states has a shameful past in Africa, but in the present position, I think we’re duty bound to support Ukraine, and not just with words.
London Labour should use the unexpected need to boost defence spending (forced on Europe by Trump) as the main reason to raise taxes.
It pains me to say it, but Europe as a whole has not been pulling its weight. The taxes raised by the next budget have already been spent. A direct input of money to the defence budget is what’s required.
To be fair, it’s the way the US wanted it for decades. Before Trump they were proudly Team America: World Police.
As long as we have ex-servicemen homeless in our streets, and single mothers struggling, then nations who have been independent for more than 40 years should not receive any aid whatsoever. If all people are equal, they can save their own people.
Yes. We have a collective guilt from the days of Empire, but too many warlords are raking it in at the expense of their own people. Having drawn a map without respecting tribal territories has been part of the disaster in the African nations.
A painful truth but there are temporary accommodation spaces for all homeless in Wales, people who are on the streets within Wales at the moment are there by choice.
Also, Wales has given veterans an advantage on the housing list since 2014.
The “veterans on the streets” thing genuinely isn’t a thing in Wales.
All aid should be delivered through the UN.