Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Green activist calls for resignation of Welsh Government ministers in trans surgery row

01 Oct 2026 8 minute read
Green Party leader Zack Polanski, Wales Green Party leader Anthony Slaughter and then Senedd candidate Tessa Marshall at the launch of the Wales Green Party election campaign earlier this year. Photo credit: Ben Birchall/PA Wire

Martin Shipton

A prominent Green Party activist has called for the resignations of Health Minister Mabon ap Gwynfor and Deputy First Minister Sioned Williams following a decision to pause gender-related surgery while a review takes place.

A sub-committee of the NHS Wales Joint Commissioning Committee (NWJCC) decided to “pause” all surgeries and referrals after it emerged that the rate of surgical referrals from the Welsh Gender Service was running at three to four times the equivalent rate in England.

Tessa Marshall, who was the Green Party’s unsuccessful number two Senedd candidate for Caerdydd Penarth in May’s election, has written a lengthy Substack article in which she denounces the review as a transphobic attack on vulnerable people and calls for the resignation of ministers and for clinicians involved in pausing surgery and referrals to be struck off.

Ms Marshall writes: “This decision has devastated and crushed Trans+ and LGBTQIA+ people across Wales, whether they were one of the 500+ people on the surgical waiting list or not. Most people in our community know someone who was on that list.

“At least one patient was in hospital, in their gown, when nurses delivered the news that their surgery was cancelled. Others were prepared for surgery in the following days and weeks.

“This surgery is the critical, gender-affirming care Trans+ patients have waited years for – and worked to prove they need for at least two decades of their lives.

“The depth of the harm is overwhelming and still growing. The Trans+ community is reeling. Gender-affirming care is life-saving. This decision puts lives at risk.”

Ms Marshall states: “The decision put gender-affirming care up for debate, signalling a dangerous turn for the Trans+ and LGBTQIA+ community. This deplorable politicisation of surgical care marks a deeply ominous new chapter in the fight for the rights of Trans+ people to dignity, freedom, and healthcare.

“Although it’s over a month since the decision was made, the review still hasn’t started and there’s still very little evidence justifying the ‘pause’ of all surgeries and surgical referrals.

“There’s no information on when care will restart, so ‘stopping’ or ‘cancelling’ are more appropriate terms. There’s been barely an update on what the review will do, what criteria it will use to decide whether patients are eligible for care, or whether they’ll have their care ripped away.

“This has all shown that institutional transphobia is rife. A handful of senior directors of an opaque and inaccessible body can simply decide one day to put the lives of Trans+ patients on hold, despite having no information about them as patients, people or individuals, or what this surgery will do for their quality of life.

“And the Welsh Government, despite having the powers to oversee the decisions of the NWJCC and, crucially, to override them, has sat on its hands and done nothing.”

‘Evidence’

Ms Marshall goes on to claim that the only “cold hard evidence” shared so far to justify the cancellation of surgeries for almost 500 people is the data comparing surgical referrals in Wales with England.

She adds: “No safety issues have been publicly identified (as the Reform and Conservative members of the Senedd seem to believe). No patients have complained about the quality and standards of their care.

“Crucially, no desk-based analysis or report has been published to outline the case that cancelling surgeries is necessary and proportional, and how patients will be supported as a result of the decision.”

The activist argues that the comparison of referral statistics is an “inadequate and inappropriate metric” for the following reasons:

“In parts of England, patients are waiting over 8 years to have their initial appointment with their local gender service. In the Welsh Gender Service, this wait is a more proportional – yet still unacceptably high – 1 year and 8 months. With extremely long waits, it’s not unfair to presume that many English Trans+ people are simply self-funding private surgery.

“Many (if not all) Gender Services in England cover a larger population than the Welsh Gender Service, which covers just 3 million people.

“The Welsh Gender Service is also working through a backlog of patients, as the service itself is newer than those services in England.

“There is no Gender Service for children and young people in Wales, meaning Trans+ people first present for gender-affirming care with the WGS, unlike in England, where these services are theoretically available for those under 18 (although, in practice, they also have extreme waits of up to 4 years).

“The data itself aligns with the rates of referrals seen by the Welsh Gender Service between 2021 and 2025.”

Ms Marshall states: “It seems that instead of analysing the data provided by the Gender Dysphoria National Referral Support Service, the NWJCC and the Welsh Government took the figures at face value, failing to interrogate them in any desk-based analysis. This is deeply troubling.

“The GDNRSS is the English body overseeing the failing Trans+ healthcare system in England, biasing its data towards failing services.

“Instead of working with the Welsh Gender Service to interrogate and analyse the data, a basic comparison table was used to justify cancelling critical care for 500 patients, including at least 60 who had passed all checks and balances to reach the point of surgery. No one in the Welsh Government seems to have questioned this analysis.”

‘Crumbled’

Ms Marshall goes on to attack Plaid Cymru and its ministers, stating: “Plaid Cymru said in their manifesto they’d support the Trans+ community. But instead of publicly backing Trans people, they’ve crumbled.

“Over the summer they met with gender-critical groups, and rumour has it they didn’t know about the NWJCC decision until Friday August 28, along with everyone else.

“The decision to cancel surgeries is patently absurd, dangerous, and disproportionate.

“It’s undermined the trust the Welsh Gender Service built between the Trans+ community and the NHS, on the basis of flimsy evidence and the influence of extreme transphobia.

“There are obviously many other ways the so-called evidence could have been investigated before deciding ‘cancel all surgeries, now!’.

“Right now, there are people in very important jobs who made this decision to cause this harm and they continue to sleep comfortably at night.

“I want to see action and systemic change:

“The Health Minister should use his powers to suspend the Chair and Director and investigate the NWJCC.

“The Minister must reinstate the surgical pathway immediately. All 60 patients who were signed off to have surgery this year must receive surgery this year.

“After reinstating the surgical pathway, the Minister for Health should resign for allowing this harm to patients.

“The Minister for Social Justice [Sioned Williams, who is also Deputy First Minister] should also resign her position for failing in her duty to protect the Trans+ community from harm, but crucially for failing to advocate for the Trans community effectively in her important role as the national, governmental advocate for marginalised communities.

“Healthcare Inspectorate Wales should launch a concurrent investigation into the NWJCC and its decision-making processes, investigating whether these are fit for purpose, proportionate, and safe.”

The Welsh Government said: “The pause in gender-affirming surgery was an independent and clinically led decision made by the NHS Wales Joint Commissioning Committee. As is appropriate, the Welsh Government had no role in the decision.

“The Ministers sought and received assurances that the decision is a pause, not a stop. Each relevant case will be reviewed, and once the JCC has assurances that appropriate clinical assessments are in place, individuals will progress to surgery at the earliest possible opportunity. Ministers recognise the distress this pause is causing for those affected and the wider community. The Deputy First Minister has met several Trans Advocacy organisations to hear their concerns and perspectives and reassure them of the on-going support for the trans community.

“The Cabinet Minister for Health and Care has also written to Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and has received assurance that support is being provided for individuals affected, and that the patient body Llais is engaged.

“The Deputy First Minister and the Cabinet Minister for Health and Care continue to closely monitor the situation to ensure that patients and those affected are kept informed and supported.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

91 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Evan Aled Bayton
Evan Aled Bayton
19 days ago

Why is the NHS providing this when it fails to do hip replacements and many other absolutely essential operations?

Milo Scope
Milo Scope
19 days ago

Not totally sure you want a specialist in sex-reassignment surgery being retasked to do hip replacements.

Bob
Bob
18 days ago
Reply to  Milo Scope

Maybe they do… based on previous posts Evan isn’t the brightest star in the sky, after all.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago

The NHS does ALL those operations and the waiting times are WAY shorter than for THIS absolutely essential operation

Jeff
Jeff
19 days ago

The hate that has been pouring into Trans is visible from the moon. Follow the money. If we have a government being directed by this intervention them make they need to change or re think.

When the usual suspects have finished with Trans rights, which are human rights, who do you think they will go after next?

Milo Scope
Milo Scope
19 days ago
Reply to  Jeff

They’re already trying to make homophobia a protected belief like ‘gender-critical’ so there’s one answer.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Jeff

It will be the same as in the USA. Women’s bodily autonomy. They’re already here. They’re already pivoting to that.
Women’s healthcare – such as endometriosis – is already being slowly disgarded.
Maybe impotence care should be the one to take the hit?

Jeff
Jeff
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

The US is a source of a lot of funding and hate into the UK and has been for many years. They are setting up a PAC to meddle in elections as well. They have removed so many women’s rights in the US under trump, woman are dying. And many of the proponents that get to push this in the US are convicted for sex crimes but have had pardons from Trump, and they have reach here.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Jeff

Oh absolutely. It amazes me they people think it’s just folks like me in line for having their rights taken away. It’s written there in black and white in the pages of Project 2025, by the Heritage Foundation, an organisation funded by Christofascist Billionnaires to inform Republican policy and then export it.

Amir
Amir
19 days ago

I am not quite sure how gender surgery can be classed as life saving compared to a quadruple heart bypass or transplant surgery. I understand that there are people who are unhappy and depressed even that they need to wait. But, it is still a lifestyle choice.

Milo Scope
Milo Scope
19 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Well let’s chuck hip and knee replacements in there if ‘life-saving’ is your bar. And the lifestyle choice stuff, fascinating to see old homophobic tropes getting a new lease of life.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Milo Scope

Actually knee and hip operations are life saving as mobility is crucial for our health in terms of regulating our sugar levels, blood pressure, stroke , cancer and heart disease prevention. As far as i know, those on the trans waiting list are able to be mobile without pain.

Milo Scope
Milo Scope
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Mobility isn’t a pre-req for health, wheelchair users can stay perfectly healthy. And it’s not mobility that affects the lives of trans people, it’s various other consequences – depression, self-harm, substance use, eating disorders, all sorts.

I’m fortunate in that my gender dysphoria isn’t severe enough to require surgery but for some trans people it is truly life-saving.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Milo Scope

lifespan of wheel chair users is severely less compared to those who can walk upright.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Lifespan of trans people denied surgery is severely less compared to those who can have their operations.

Rich
Rich
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Well said.

Milo Scope
Milo Scope
19 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Hell, if we’re going for a ‘lifestyle choice’ argument, who’s getting these quadruple bypasses? People who’ve made a lifestyle choice to have a poor diet and not exercise over the course of decades? If you support restricting healthcare on the basis of lifestyle, you’re supporting letting such people die.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Milo Scope

Even people with healthy lifestyles need life saving surgery.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

You are SO CLOSE to getting it Amir. SO CLOSE! Bring it home now. Transgender people with healthy lifestyles need life saving surgery. I don’t drink, I don’t smoke, I don’t take drugs, I walk, I hike, I eat pretty well. I have a healthy BMI. I am well over 40 and my entire life’s medical treatment record can be fit on one side of an A4 sheet. I need this one single thing to pretty much save my life. Studies show that transition – in transgender people – usually results in an intelligence boost and a productivity boost, as… Read more »

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

I don’t think I have ever mentioned anything about trans people not having the surgery on the NHS.

But, it should continue to be classed as routine surgery not critical surgery.

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
19 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Do you also think that being gay, lesbian or bisexual is a lifestyle choice? It absolutely is not a choice. It’s how people are born. It’s who they are. If it was a matter of choice, I would hazard a guess that given the challenges, the hardship, the discrimination and hate that people receive for being trans, they would likely not choose to be trans. But they cannot do such a thing, as it is not a matter of lifestyle choice. I would recommend speaking to people from the trans community and hearing about their experiences and challenges. Doing this… Read more »

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

It is a lifestyle choice. It is a pursuit of happiness and life can be sustained for several years while the person remains in the ‘wrong’ body.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Is it your “lifestyle choice” to be straight?
If you were told that you had to be gay, could you do it?

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

WHY do we need to wait? there’s not ONE BIG WAITLIST OF EVERYTHING.
Why should our lifesaving operations be sacrificed for whatever other cisgender people operation you can think up to belittle us by comparison?

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

Not sure what typing in caps will attain.

See my comment above for your response.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

For emphasis only. your comments above are inadequate as a response to this question

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

We all have to wait because of resource management and a finite pot of money.

We don’t have to wait so much for private treatment because the costs ensure all the specialist staff, equipment and aftercare are available sooner.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

And our “finite pot of money” was coping just fine. Are you saying that our finite pot of designated money should be stolen from us and given to another department that cannot manage their budget? How would that be fair?

Sorry about the bold and italic. I know how formatting variation upsets and confuses you. They are there for emphasis only

Last edited 18 days ago by Agnes Nutter
Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

I don’t think the aim of the review is to ‘steal’ the money away.

It would be to see why the proportion of referrals in Wales is higher then in England and whether all the referrals are in the best interests of the person.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

You think wrong. There is no valid justification for the “pause”. There is no risk to patient health. There is no suggestion of surgical inadequacy. There is not one single indicator of inappropriate referral. There is not one single indicator of a negative outcome even. Were this a good faith “review” (it is not) This could have been reviewed whilst permitting surgeries to continue. What you “don’t think” about something that has not devastated your life is entirely irrelevant. The fact that this appalling performance mimics every single other “review” by the NHS management, that has stolen away rights and… Read more »

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

I think the issue is with the actual cases awaiting surgery, hence the pause.

Hywel
Hywel
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Sane and rational point. You’ll note many of the responses to you are anything but.

Rhian
Rhian
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

You are 100% correct Amir. You’ll also note the anger. This is why pro trans protests are more aggressive than than a Tommy Robinson pub crawl. Now you understand why biological women want to protect their toilets and changing rooms.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Rhian

I see WRN Cymru are back online.

Wow! People being angry that their human rights and right to healthcare is being stolen form them. How strange!

Transgender people getting access to surgery they were promised has nothing to do with toilets and changing rooms or womens safety. If anything it makes them saferr with one less p***s in the world
Nice try though

Last edited 18 days ago by Agnes Nutter
Guess Again
Guess Again
18 days ago
Reply to  Rhian

Wow, comparing law abiding trans people with a hardcore coked-up racist and convicted domestic abuser who hangs around with convicted sex offenders. How low can you go?

Guess Again
Guess Again
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Sorry to disagree with you here Amir but being trans is absolutely not a lifestyle choice, any more than being gay or bisexual is.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Guess Again

Happy to agree to disagree and very happy for adults to decide what body to live in and what bits to keep and what to chop off.

Milo Scope
Milo Scope
19 days ago

The fact that the government has the power to overrule this decision and chooses not to makes their support for trans people ring hollow. They could still do their review, just don’t cancel surgeries in the meantime.

Breast surgeries didn’t get cancelled awaiting ‘review’ after the County Durham case where actual tangible harm was identified. In this case, no harm has been identified, only imaginary potential harm.

Sarah Wilkinson
Sarah Wilkinson
19 days ago

So many non-facts in that rant from Tessa.
Thank goodness she’s not in the Senedd.

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
18 days ago

Care to name any of the “non-facts”?

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

Gender reassigning surgery is not life saving. It is life improving surgery.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

So we should have it then, yes? It is a good thing to improve our lives? Yes?

Bob
Bob
18 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

She won’t, because she never does. All these Reform bots come on here, spout their nonsense and wobble off back to Spoons. That’s why it’s important to call them out.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago

Every single word she has written is true.
I have personally spoken with the girl who was in the operating theatre in her gown when her operation was stolen from her by this ideological pogrom.

One could only DREAM of as rigorous and passionate and entirely facts based represenative as Ms Marshall

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

No, this surgery is not critical surgery. Critical care implies imminent loss of life or at best loss of the function of vital organs

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Yes it is. You are just some guy. Imminent loss of life is a real possibility when something that was yours is stolen from you at the 11th hour by the very people who are tasked with delivering it. There is no argument as to the criticality of it. This is supposed to be a treatment “review”. You are trying to move the goal posts. There is no discussion to be had about whether these surgeries achieve what they are designed to. They categorically do. Your ideology is irrelevant to the story at hand. Whether we deserve these surgeries (we… Read more »

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

No, it isn’t critical. Critical literally means imminent loss to life or vital organs such as brain damage as a result of meningitis or cancer.

Are you seriously suggesting that gender reassignment surgery is on par with onco surgery or even surgery to repair acute appendicitis or acute peritonitis?

Leigh Richards
Leigh Richards
18 days ago

Is Tessa Marshall speaking for herself here – or is it on behalf of the ‘england and wales green party’? Also did she consult with the two greens in the Senedd before issuing this demand?

Last edited 18 days ago by Leigh Richards
Ian
Ian
18 days ago
Reply to  Leigh Richards

Tessa Marshall is trying to raise her profile in the media by being deliberately provocative, as there is a Green leadership contest in Wales this month. It is of course down to their membership who they choose, but her reputation is one of burning & not building bridges with others.

Llynn
Llynn
18 days ago

The idea that Ministers (plural) should be sacked for this situation is frankly absurd. Does anyone else really think heads should roll over this?

If Tessa was in the Senedd the press would have a field day with this type of nonsense and with the Greens being so close to Plaid it could also harm the party and government.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Llynn

Agreed.

She also wants the clinicians struck off. There won’t be anyone left to carry out the surgeries once the review is completed.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

NWJCC are not clinicians. They are administrators. They have no expertise whatsoever in transgender healthcare.

The surgeons are all based inn England, and they support our surgeries continuing. English surgeries are still continuing.

Why do you hate WELSH people having equal rights to surgery?

Last edited 18 days ago by Agnes Nutter
Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

No the expert panel that is independently reviewing these cases are experienced clinicians.

I don’t hate Welsh people.

I don’t hate anyone. Life is too short for hatred.

I want the best for people including trans and I want them to be genuinely happy with the outcome of their transitions.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago

This review was initiated by clinicians who care for their patients.

This is not trans hatred.

Surgery is not always a solution and there are other ways of managing care.

Down voting comments does not allow a critical discourse on this issue.

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

No it was not. It was initiated by a Sex Matters hack, Deform and the Tories and the NWJCC of which most are not in in way shape or form clinicians.

Zero clinicians with gender care expertise, were even consulted or informed.
You seemed fine earlier when the rest of your WRN Cymru Whatsapp group was mass downvoting supportive comments.

Surgery IS the best solution for the transgender people who need it. Sixty years of research and evidence can confirm this and nearly all of the civilised world’s scientific, psychiatric and medical profession recognises this.

Britain is a statistical outlier.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

Tessa mentioned clinicians in her article

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

No she didn’t. She said

“A handful of senior directors of an opaque and inaccessible body can simply decide one day to put the lives of Trans+ patients on hold, despite having no information about them as patients, people or individuals, or what this surgery will do for their quality of life.”

Where did you get Clinicians out of that?

I have re-read the article twice and I cant find a single use of the word

Maybe they said it in your WRN Cymru whataspp group briefing notes

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

Re read the third paragraph where she want the clinicians involved in pausing the surgery struck off.

Hywel
Hywel
18 days ago
Reply to  Amir

You are completely correct. Well said Amir.

Ryan S
Ryan S
18 days ago

Dear me! This is like Yes Cymru all over again.
the greens are a shadow of the party I used to vote for. What a shambles

Agnes Nutter
Agnes Nutter
18 days ago
Reply to  Ryan S

Yes. We had to fight against anti-trans bigotry then too.
Half the membership left YesCymru when the tansphobes took control.

I know that Plaid Cymru are losing votes and members over this now too.

Plaid are indeed a shambles

Ryan S
Ryan S
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

christ, that’s an extreme position to take!

Last edited 18 days ago by Ryan S
Leigh Richards
Leigh Richards
18 days ago
Reply to  Agnes Nutter

You must have missed Yes Cymru’s recent hugely successful march in Aberystwyth Agnes. Also can you provide any evidence to back up your claim that Plaid Cymru are ‘losing votes and members’? As recent opinion polls suggest nothing of the sort

Hywel
Hywel
18 days ago

Gold star to Amir for remaining calm and rational in the face of hate. Hopefully anyone can now see exactly why biological women want to keep their spaces and sports for biological women.

Bob
Bob
18 days ago
Reply to  Hywel

For maintaining his transphobia in the face of reasoned replies, you mean.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Bob

The replies I received were incorrect for the most part. None of my comments were transphobic. The majority of my comments were pointing out that gender reassignment surgery is not critical surgery. Rather these would be classed as routine surgeries.

Johnny
Johnny
18 days ago

Nick Tenconi if you are reading this your input into the comments section would be much appreciated

Lesbian Cymraeg
Lesbian Cymraeg
18 days ago

Please don’t use the LGB in your acronym. Being homosexual i.e. same sex attracted is not the same as transgender. Indeed, transgenderism is homophobic.

Lyn E
Lyn E
18 days ago

Why is England seen as the standard for health care? Perhaps what should be reviewed is why the English NHS is performing less well on this.

Cancelling scheduled surgery is not usual when best practice reviews are conducted.

Leigh Richards
Leigh Richards
18 days ago

My comment asking whether Tessa Marshall was speaking for herself on this matter or on behalf of the England and Wales Green party? And whether she had consulted with greens in the Senedd before calling for the resignations of the plaid ministers seems to have been removed – why was this? They were perfectly reasonable questions to pose. Certainly there was nothing in my post to justify its removal.

Amir
Amir
18 days ago
Reply to  Leigh Richards

It was just bots down voting our comments that got it removed. Your comment has been reinstated above.

Johnny
Johnny
17 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Amir I wouldn’t rule out Fanatics voting as many times as they want in support of This Green Party Activists.

Tammy
Tammy
15 days ago

I can see the right wing whatsapp channel got this out to their members.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.