Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Housing demands ‘outweigh’ villagers’ love of green space

26 Sep 2026 4 minute read
View of the development site on land north of James Street, Trethomas, pictured in June 2025. Credit: Google

Nicholas Thomas, Local Democracy Reporter

Senior councillors will push ahead with proposals to build accessible bungalows on land which locals argue is cherished and well-used green space.

Caerphilly County Borough Council received 149 objections to its plan to dispose of the land north of James Street, Trethomas so its property arm – Caerphilly Homes – can start building.

Critics argued the development would lead to a loss of public open space, damage local biodiversity, and pose a flood risk.

But council cabinet members heard the eight new homes would provide much-needed accessible housing for people on local waiting lists, which include many who have medical conditions.

Cllr Shayne Cook, the cabinet member for housing, invited colleagues to conclude the potential benefits of the development “outweigh” the public objections received.

Housing director Nick Taylor-Williams said there was a “significant demand for accessible bungalow accommodation”, including 92 households waiting for one-bedroom homes in Trethomas, and 102 in neighbouring Bedwas.

For two-bedroom bungalows, there were more than 300 people on the local register, including some in the highest-priority group who had been “waiting for several years”, he added.

Mr Taylor-Williams said Caerphilly Homes’ borough-wide waiting list currently included 6,620 “active applicants”.

The objections to the disposal of the land included fond family and childhood recollections from people growing up there, and critics argued the loss of much of the site to housing would remove a safe playing area for children.

One young resident described the land as a haven where “our parents know it is safe from busy roads”.

“Please do not dispose of this land – it is one of the only places in Trethomas [where] children can play freely with friends,” they wrote.

Objectors also said wildflowers growing on the land help support local beekeepers, and there was a “strong desire” for a community orchard to be established there.

“This open space is a peaceful area in the village,” wrote another objector. “People use it for quiet reflection, gentle walking, bird watching and simply enjoying time away from traffic and built surroundings.

“Peaceful and vibrant green pockets like this are increasingly rare and once lost, they cannot be recreated. The wellbeing value of this space far outweighs the limited development proposed.”

However, Cllr Chris Morgan read out a letter to his cabinet colleagues, from a Trethomas resident whose children would “greatly benefit” from living in one of the accessible bungalows.

He said the cabinet should be “aware that views on the proposal are universally opposed, and there are residents in the village with compelling circumstances who might directly benefit from the development proceeding”.

A cabinet report noted a predecessor council had bought the land for housing but not all the land was developed, so the local authority had treated it as open space.

Responding to concerns about the loss of that space, the council said the quality of the unused land left over after building would “mitigate against this loss”.

Mr Taylor-Williams said new planting and landscaping – including an orchard element – would be established on the remaining land.

The council added it had considered the project’s environmental impacts during the planning process, and the development could go ahead “without resulting in long-term impacts on protected species, and will deliver ecological enhancements”.

On flood risk concerns, the council said the construction plans were subject to a drainage assessment which would have to be approved before any development could begin.

The local authority also said proposed alternative sites for the accessible bungalows would have led to more disruption for neighbours.

“Members will appreciate from the number and the nature of the objections received that the land is valued locally, and it is currently used as open space for members of the public,” said Mr Taylor-Williams.

“However, that value must be balanced against the significant and growing need for affordable and accessible housing in the area.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.