Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Iran says it attacked US forces at air base in Qatar

23 Jun 2025 3 minute read
Qatar’s Al Udeid Air Base. Photo US gov, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

David Rising, Associated Press

Iran has launched missile attacks on US military bases in Qatar and Iraq, retaliating for the American bombing of its nuclear sites and escalating tensions in the volatile region.

People in Doha, Qatar’s capital, stopped and looked up as missiles flew and interceptors fired and struck at least one missile in the night sky.

State television

Iran announced on state television that it attacked American forces stationed at Qatar’s Al Udeid Air Base.

A caption on screen called it “a mighty and successful response” to “America’s aggression” as martial music played.

Iran also targeted the Ain al-Assad base housing US troops in western Iraq, an Iraqi security official told The Associated Press.

The attacks came shortly after Qatar closed its airspace as a precaution amid threats from Iran.

Just before the explosions, Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: “We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer.”

In the past, Iran has threatened American forces at Al Udeid Air Base, which hosts the forward headquarters of the US military’s Central Command.

Gas field

Qatar, across the Persian Gulf from Iran, maintains diplomatic relations with Iran and shares a massive offshore natural gas field with Tehran.

Earlier in the day, Israel expanded its war against Iran to include targets associated with the country’s struggling theocracy, striking the gate of a Tehran prison notorious for holding political activists and hitting the headquarters of the military force that suppressed recent protests.

As plumes of thick smoke rose over Tehran, Israel was attacked with yet another barrage of Iranian missiles and drones.

The persistent fire has become a reality for civilians in both countries since Israel started the war to target Tehran’s rapidly advancing nuclear programme.

On the 11th day of the conflict, Israel said it attacked “regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran”, but Israeli officials insisted they did not seek the overthrow of Iran’s government, their archenemy since the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The Israeli military warned Iranians that it would continue to attack military sites around Tehran over “the coming days” as its focuses has shifted to symbolic targets as well.

The military issued the warning on the social platform X, though Iranians are struggling to access the outside world as an internet shutdown has crippled the country.

The latest strikes unfolded only hours after President Donald Trump openly raised the possibility himself after just a day earlier inserting America into the war with its unprecedented stealth-bomber strike on three Iranian nuclear sites.

“If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???” he asked on his Truth Social website.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Amir
Amir
25 days ago

Somehow feels like pearl harbour.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
25 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Strange choice, to me it feels like slackwater, the 24 hours before the new moon when the shadows return to their nooks and crannies after the disaster of that fireball in the sky…but what do I know…Sanity will not return until the Devil has his day… feels like the morning after, in the OK Corral…

Daniel Pitt
Daniel Pitt
25 days ago

In light of the rapidly escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran, and the growing risk of broader regional conflagration, I elect to adopt a position of principled neutrality. This stance does not imply disengagement or moral ambiguity, but reflects a strategic preference for conflict mitigation over alignment, and for outcomes that prioritise regional stability and global systemic resilience. At a time when the international order is already under acute stress – from the protracted conflict in Ukraine to intensifying global energy insecurity and economic fragmentation – further destabilisation in the Middle East poses multi-dimensional risks: geopolitical, humanitarian, and macroeconomic. I… Read more »

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.