Labour reports alleged hack of Nigel Farage’s phone and bank by Russia to police

Harry Taylor, Press Association Political Staff
Labour has reported the alleged hacking of Nigel Farage’s phone and bank accounts by Russia to police, the chairwoman of the party has said.
Anna Turley wrote to the leader of Reform UK to say she had contacted the National Cyber Security Council (NCSC) and the Metropolitan Police over claims made by Reform UK sources that analysts had found potential Moscow-linked state actors had targeted him.
It was indicated that the purported hack was linked to the disclosure of the £5 million donation to Mr Farage by Thailand-based crypto-entrepreneur Christopher Harborne in 2024.
The Mail on Sunday reported claims from Reform UK that “counter-espionage experts” indicated that “hostile state actors, almost certainly linked to Moscow, had used ‘spear phishing’ tactics to compromise his phone, email and bank accounts”.
Mr Farage told the newspaper: “These actions by Russia are deeply concerning and highlight the threat they pose to British security.”
A Reform UK spokesperson said earlier this week it had already been reported “to the relevant authorities”.
However, they did not specify which bodies.
In the letter on Friday Ms Turley said: “The alleged crime is an incredibly serious one with potential wider implications for Britain’s national security, the integrity of our politics and public confidence in our democratic system.
“It is therefore essential that any evidence of hostile-state hacking or foreign interference is placed in the hands of the proper authorities for thorough and independent investigation.”
“I have therefore today contacted the National Cyber Security Centre and the Metropolitan Police to ensure that the suspicions you and Reform UK have publicly raised are investigated properly. I have done so because it is in the national interest to do so.”
The Labour politician, who is also MP for Redcar and serves as a minister without portfolio, had earlier said she would report it unless Reform confirmed it had done so, or said which bodies he had referred it to.
On Monday the former head of the National Cyber Security Centre Ciaran Martin told the Guardian that Mr Farage’s version of events were “entirely unsubstantiated” and “without any merit”.
It follows controversy over the donation by Mr Harborne.
Mr Farage has given different explanations for the £5 million sum, including non-political purposes, to pay for his safety and security and later a “reward for campaigning for Brexit for 27 years”.
The Reform UK leader had not declared it ahead of becoming an MP in July 2024, when he won his seat in Clacton on the Essex coast.
Parliamentary rules say any potentially “relevant interests” should be declared from the 12 months before becoming an MP.
The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards has already started an investigation into whether Mr Farage broke any rules.
The NCSC, Metropolitan Police and Reform UK have been contacted for comment.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Deeply troubling. What aren’t we being told?
That it didn’t happen? When he is up against it he lobs out stuff to deflect. In this case its the 5 million unaccounted for.
Maybe he was hacked, but nige has form.
Or maybe he asked his handlers to arrange the hack so be could throw some chaff around.
For a man who bangs the drum of Judeo-Christian values, Farage really should read the Bible more often:
“Bread gained by deceit tastes good to a man, but afterward his mouth will be full of gravel.”
Here’s the man who says he’s so concerned about his own safety that it costs five million pounds , yet at the same time he wants to end Wales nation of sanctuary status which protects refugees who haven’t even got a house. I know who I’d rather spend five million pounds on .
Although I don’t know what they are, I would assume that there is a clear process that is set in stone and clearly defined to all members of parliament as they join, due to how risky something like this could potentially be to the entirety of these lands. If any member of parliament were unsure of the processes that are in place, then I would expect there to be a single point of contact that is available irrelevant of the time or day of contact, who could then deal with what has potentially happened. Perhaps that’s what the National Cyber… Read more »