Lammy not accepting Iran’s claims over enriched uranium

Foreign Secretary David Lammy says he does not accept Iran’s claims that the country is enriching uranium for academic purposes.
Representatives from the United Kingdom, Germany and France held talks with Iran last week to try to break the deadlock over the country’s nuclear programme.
Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Concern
A central concern for western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to more than 400kg.
In a wide-ranging interview with The Guardian, Mr Lammy said: “Its leaders cannot explain to me – and I’ve had many conversations with them – why they need 60% enriched uranium.
“If I went to Sellafield or Urenco in Cheshire, they haven’t got anything more than 6%. The Iranians claim it’s for academic use, but I don’t accept that.”
Mr Lammy warned that Iran developing nuclear weapons could lead to an escalation of tensions in the Middle East.
Israel and the United States carried our strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June.
“Many of your readers will have watched Oppenheimer and seen the fallout of (the US building an atomic bomb),” he said.
“So it’s what (a nuclear Iran) might mean in terms of other countries in the neighbourhood who would desire one, too. And we would be very suddenly handing over to our children and grandchildren a world that had many more nuclear weapons in it than it has today.”
Regime change
The Foreign Secretary said he had heard Israeli arguments in favour of regime change in Tehran, but did not believe that was behind the US decision to strike.
The Tottenham MP added any decision to topple the government was one for the Iranian people, with his focus “on what the UK can do to stop Iran becoming a nuclear power”.
Last month, Mr Lammy suggested that Britain, France and Germany could “snap back” on sanctions against Iran unless the country gets “serious” about stepping back from its nuclear ambitions.
He told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee: “Iran face even more pressure in the coming weeks because the E3 can snap back on our sanctions, and it’s not just our sanctions, it’s actually a UN mechanism that would impose dramatic sanctions on Iran across nearly every single front in its economy.
“So they have a choice to make. It’s a choice for them to make.
“I’m very clear about the choice they should make, but I’m also clear that the UK has a decision to make that could lead to far greater pain for the Iranian regime unless they get serious about the international desire to see them step back from their nuclear ambitions at this time.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


If I were Iran with a Trump in the Whitehouse and Netanyahu trying to stay out of jail, I would be going for the bomb.
There was a deal, but Trump stopped it because the deal was an Obama era deal and Trump really is that petty.
No way do I want to see Iran with such a weapon but thems the breaks when Trump is elected.
Need a balance of power in the region. Or we end up with a nasty bully.
Iran must not get the bomb. Lammy is hardly an intellectual titan but even he understands this. Thankfully.
We get it Pete, you seem to have a problem with Muslims having nuclear weapons but not zionists.
Having the bomb seems to prevent external threat – Libya was peruaded by the West not to go down that route and just look what NATO did to it courtesy of Obama/Cameron and Sarkosy.It seems acceptable for Israel to have the bomb without any oversight by the IAEA. The double standards is rife within western responses.