Mahmood battles backlash from Labour MPs over asylum reforms
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is battling a Labour backlash over plans to “restore order and control” to the asylum system.
Labour backbenchers publicly condemned the “shameful” package, which is aimed at deterring migrants from seeking asylum in the UK and making it easier to remove people with no right to be in the country.
Allies of Ms Mahmood warned that “dark forces” would be unleashed if Labour does not respond to voters’ concerns and tackle the problem.
Ms Mahmood told MPs it was the “uncomfortable truth” that the UK’s generous asylum offer, compared to other European countries, is drawing people to UK shores, and for British taxpayers the system “feels out of control and unfair”.
“The pace and scale of change has destabilised communities. It is making our country a more divided place,” Ms Mahmood said.
“There will never be a justification for the violence and racism of a minority, but if we fail to deal with this crisis, we will draw more people down a path that starts with anger and ends in hatred.”
She said the UK was an “open, tolerant and generous” country but “to maintain the generosity that allows us to provide sanctuary, we must restore order and control”.
But a series of Labour MPs challenged Ms Mahmood over the plans, which they said echoed the rhetoric of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.
Former Labour frontbencher Richard Burgon said the policy “scrapes the bottom of the barrel” and was “a desperate attempt to triangulate with Reform”.
Ian Lavery said that when the Tories and Reform are backing the policies “is it not time to question whether we’re actually in the right place?”.
Stella Creasy said the plans would leave refugees in “a permanent sense of limbo”, and Nadia Whittome said it was “shameful that a Labour Government is ripping up the rights and protections of people who have endured unimaginable trauma”.
Simon Opher said Labour should “stop the scapegoating of immigrants because it’s wrong and cruel”, adding “we should push back on the racist agenda of Reform rather than echo it”.
Ms Mahmood told Sky News the “vast majority of my colleagues in the Labour Party were supportive of the proposals” but acknowledged “not everyone will agree”.
Engagement
A source close to the Home Secretary said: “There has been a huge amount of engagement with the Parliamentary Labour Party in recent weeks.
“That work will continue as we work with backbenchers to restore order and control and open up safe and legal routes for genuine refugees.
“The crisis at our borders is an existential issue for mainstream parties. If we don’t solve the crisis at our border, dark forces will follow.”
The plans include:
– Cutting the time refugees are initially granted to stay in the UK, from five years to a 30-month “core protection” system, which can only be renewed if it is not safe for them to return.
– Refugees will have to spend 20 years in the UK before being allowed to apply for settled status, up from five years.
– There will be no automatic right to family reunion for refugees under core protection.
– Housing and weekly allowances will no longer be guaranteed for asylum seekers and those who can work or have valuable assets will have to contribute to their costs in the UK.
– Families with children could also be subject to enforced returns under measures to remove those with no right to be in the UK.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the measures did not go far enough, adding that leaving the European Convention on Human Rights was necessary to address the problem.
She said: “The fact is, we have looked at this issue from every possible direction, and the reality is that any plan that doesn’t include leaving the ECHR as a necessary step is wasting time we don’t have.”
Mr Farage welcomed the “strong language” from the Home Secretary but asked: “Will it survive her own backbenchers in a vote?”
‘Sod off’
Responding to Mr Farage’s suggestion that her plan was “an audition to join Reform”, Ms Mahmood told Sky News: “Nigel Farage can sod off. I’m not interested in anything he’s got to say.”
The latest Home Office figures show 111,084 people applied for asylum in the UK in the year to June 2025.
This is the highest number for any 12-month period since current records began in 2001.
A contributing factor has been the continued flow of small boats across the English Channel, with almost 40,000 people making the crossing so far in 2025.
Refugee Council chief executive Enver Solomon said the reforms “sound tough” but they risk creating more delays and will not fix the real problems in the system.
On the regular reviews of refugee status, he said it would create further chaos and “overwhelm an overstretched system”, leaving families living with years of uncertainty.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
The threats made by her cronies suggest how low this government has fallen.
Damned if they do damned if they don’t.
Better damned if they don’t. Focus on the economy and social and health care please.
Now is the time for MP’s to stand up and say immigration is not the issue. Being reform is not a winner. Past this, MP’s that vote with the government are too far tainted for re election.
Get glassman and McSweeny out.
I can see why the Westminster government has opted to take this course. But the downside of this may well be that rather a lot of ordinary voters will see it as a tacit acceptance on the Labour government’s part, simply by implication, that ‘Farage and his Reform UK party are right’.
And, if they take that view, they may then be inclined, in due course, to vote for the real thing rather than for the imitation.
No-one should want people risking their lives on small boats.
Anybody else sick of this constant stream of ‘I’m in, shut the door’ English Home Secs !
Immigrants and Refugees welcome here in Wales
Something hardly ever mentioned in all this migration clamour is the hard reality that, simply to maintain the population at its current level, the average woman needs to give birth to 2.2 children – the extra 0.2 being calculated to compensate statistically for the number of women who, for one reason or another, will never have a child. However, presently I read that the ‘average woman’ in the UK gives birth to 1.4 children. The reasons are easy enough to guess, given the economic reality that these days both partners in a couple need to work in order to pay… Read more »
Bluntly, there is of course a bill working its way through parliament that may help reduce these costs. According to Marie Curie £22bn (2022) is spent each year on people in their final year of life. It’s difficult to imagine the Whitehall bureaucrats who really run Westminster haven’t considered this.
I think, since I hit the very advanced age of 80 a couple of months back, that I might be a tad worried by that!
The institutionally racist Home Office is still institutionally racist.
In the USA, people have fewer children because 2 parents working STILL cannot readily afford the cost of raising those children and also pay the cost of supporting “newcomers.” That is just my opinion, of course. We welcome migrants but we need to be more diligent when determining 2 things: Are the migrants able to support themselves in jobs available in this country, without prolonged gov’t assistance, and, are they coming here to become Americans or simply to create communities that perpetuate the culture and traditions of the country they left? Diversity is fine as long as it does not… Read more »