Support our Nation today - please donate here

Ministry of Defence told ‘fix or fail’ Welsh-built Ajax tank programme

03 Jun 2022 3 minute read
A General Dynamics UK Ajax armoured fighting vehicle (behind) and a DCE (Digital Concepts Engineering) X series all-terrain unmanned ground vehicle.Photo Andrew Matthews PA Images

The Ministry of Defence should fix or scrap its troubled Ajax armoured vehicle programme this year, or risk compromising national security, an influential parliamentary committee has warned.

The Ajax programme, intended to provide a state-of-the-art reconnaissance vehicle for the Army, has already been running for 12 years and cost £3.2 billion but has so far failed to deliver a single deployable vehicle.

The vehicles are assembled by General Dynamics Land Systems UK (GDLSUK) in Merthyr Tydfil, which employs a staff of 700.

Originally intended to enter service in 2017, Ajax has been repeatedly delayed due to what the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has described as “a litany of failures” including noise and vibration problems that injured soldiers testing the vehicles.

In a report published on Friday, the PAC warned that the MoD still did not know when Ajax would enter service or whether the noise and vibration issues could even be fixed two years after they were first raised.

The PAC said management of the programme had been “flawed from the outset” and the MoD had “once again made fundamental mistakes” in planning and managing a major equipment programme.

As a result, the committee warned that the MoD was “failing to deliver” the vehicles the Army needed “to better protect the nation and meet Nato commitments”.


PAC chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier said: “Enough is enough – the MoD must fix or fail this programme, before more risk to our national security and more billions of taxpayers’ money wasted.

“These repeated failures are putting strain on older capabilities which are overdue for replacement and are directly threatening the safety of our service people and their ability to protect the nation and meet Nato commitments.”

The MoD said any delays would not come at extra cost to the taxpayer due to the nature of the contract, adding that no further payments would be made to manufacturer General Dynamics until the department was “satisfied with the future trajectory of the programme”.

The PAC report said delays to the Ajax programme had forced the Army to make “operational compromises” including prolonging use of the Warrior armoured vehicle which entered service in 1987.

Although the Army is “cautiously optimistic” that Ajax can enter service by 2030, the PAC warned that any further delays would increase the risk of missing even this target and urged the MoD to explore alternatives should the contract with General Dynamics collapse.


The MoD agreed a fixed-price contract with General Dynamics worth £5.5 billion for 589 Ajax armoured vehicles, but so far just 26 have been delivered and these can only be used for training purposes.

The PAC said it doubted that the programme could be delivered within existing arrangements.

The committee said it expected a decision on whether to persevere with Ajax or scrap the programme entirely by the end of the year.

An MoD spokesperson said: “The UK contributes more than its force requirements and readiness levels asked of it by Nato.

“The Defence Secretary has been clear that Ajax is a troubled programme. We agree with many of the committee’s recommendations and are actively taking steps to correct these.

“Our firm price contract means any delays will not cost the taxpayer more. General Dynamics have received no payments under the contract in 2021 and 2022. No further payments will be made until we are satisfied with the future trajectory of the programme.”

General Dynamics has been approached for comment.

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Oh look. More clone “parody” screen names. If only the moderators would moderate this site.

1 year ago
Reply to  Llinos

The ref and T.M.O at N.C are sleeping at the wheel. WAKE UP BOYS AND GIRLS !. Turning to the issue at stake here. The G.D investment has lasted a good while considering how others, like Koreans have come and gone. However these types of inward investments loaded up with government grants and freebies only serve to reinforce the dependency culture so prevalent here in Wales, which pleases the manipulators in London no end. Given the present regime’s fixation with other matters I don’t see things changing. Even on renewables the preference is to give big international corporates large dollops… Read more »

Peter Cuthbert
Peter Cuthbert
1 year ago
Reply to  hdavies15

One wonders why the MOD is spending huge amounts of cash developing a military vehicle which surely could have been done quicker and more cheaply in a consortium with the French and Germans. Yes we want manufacturing jobs for Wales, but we need to be somewhat wary. These military construction jobs are funded by Central Government so can be pulled at any point if the Welsh Government displeases the Westminster bunch.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.