Nandy says ‘promises matter’ but declines to reveal tax pledge position
A Cabinet minister insisted “promises matter” but declined to say whether she agreed with Labour’s deputy leader that the UK Government should stick to its pledges on tax at the Budget.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy warned that “difficult decisions” were required as she faced questions about her former Cabinet colleague Lucy Powell’s call for the party’s manifesto commitments to be honoured.
Labour promised during the general election not to raise income tax, VAT or national insurance.
But a refusal across Government to recommit to this pledge in recent days has fuelled speculation that the Chancellor is preparing to increase income tax as she tries to balance the books.
Asked whether she agreed with Ms Powell, the former Commons Leader, Ms Nandy told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme: “Look, we take our promises very, very seriously and we did make specific commitments around tax in the manifesto.
“But we were also elected on a promise to change this country, and through the record investment that we’ve been able to put into the National Health Service, we’re seeing waiting times coming down and more appointments being made available on a whole range of measures.
“We’re delivering the change that people want to see. We are going to have to make difficult decisions. I’m not going to write the Budget live on air.”
Earlier this week, Ms Powell suggested breaking the pledge not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT would damage “trust in politics”.
The former Commons leader told BBC Radio 5 Live: “We should be following through on our manifesto, of course. There’s no question about that.”
She continued: “Trust in politics is a key part of that because if we’re to take the country with us then they’ve got to trust us and that’s really important too.”
Challenging
Speaking on Sunday, Ms Nandy said: “I agree with Lucy Powell that promises matter.
“I also agree with her that the situation that this Government inherited is very challenging.
“We’ve got to make fair choices, and like she said in answer to a question about this, she will of course always support the Chancellor to make the right decisions in the interest of the country.”
Rachel Reeves could use a rise in income tax to help plug what the National Institute of Economic and Social Research said is a £50 billion black hole in public finances and give herself a larger fiscal headroom.
The Chancellor is also rumoured to be considering a proposal by the Resolution Foundation, a think tank with close links to the Treasury, to increase income tax by 2p on the pound while cutting national insurance by the same amount.
The move was framed by the foundation as a “switch” plan that would help to iron out “unfairness” in the system by spreading the tax burden across a wider group, including pensioners and landlords.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
It is breaking promises they don’t take seriously, that and human rights and international law, aid for starving children and any kind of protection from genocidal maniacs…
Nandy Pandy
She will get a nasty rash on her legs and backside from sitting on that thorny fence. Now realises that all those 2024 promises were a crock of sh*t. You either leave taxes untouched or you raise funds to do things. Yet no one seems to contemplate going after the shysters, other high earners, and high net worth idlers who devote loads of energy and £ to dodging tax or using the government’s own shoddy loophole riddled taxation regime. Loads of scope for fundraising if Rachel and Co had some bottle to go for it.
You can also give away our gold as someone once did.
Of course promises matter. They promised to smash the gangs.
They are smashing the gangs. Just more gangs come along and replace them.
Because that’s what happens when Brexiteers create a lucrative demand by taking us out of the Dublin deterrent.
Used to be some sort of accepted silence leading up to budget and rightly so.
Now everyone is trying for a gotcha.
Lazy press.
This will hinge on the definition of working people.
And no, a hard working CEO on £300k is not a working person in need of state support, even if they do an 100 hour week.
Protect everyone on less than the average salary. The rest are fair game.