Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

NRW raises fresh concerns about ‘inadequate’ restoration plan for controversial mine

15 Oct 2025 5 minute read
Ffos-y-Fran. Photo Droneski Imaging

Martin Shipton

Wales’ environmental regulator has lodged fresh objections to a planning application that, if approved, could let a mining company off the hook for remediation costs totalling around £100m.

Natural Resources Wales (NRW) has sent a lengthy letter to Merthyr Tydfil council, raising concerns about a ”light touch” remediation plan for the Ffos-y-fran mine, which until it closed in November 2023 was the nation’s largest opencast mine.

When it first opened, the company running the mine, now known as Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, pledged to fully restore the site after it finished operations.

But despite paying out nearly £50m in dividends and royalties since 2017, the firm now claims it can’t afford a full remediation of the site, estimated to cost up to  £120m.

Earlier this year Nation.Cymru revealed how David Lewis, the sole director of Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, had a conviction for defrauding a bank of £88,000 to fund his gambling addiction and how recently he had assaulted an elderly solicitor outside his Newport office.

Scaled down

The company has applied for planning permission to undertake a scaled-down remediation of the Ffos-y-Fran site – even though around £91m has been set aside for the remediation work in accounts lodged at Companies House.

However a campaigning organisation called the Coal Action Network (CAN), has called for the application to be rejected. It argues that the company is trying to wriggle out of its legal responsibilities and land the public sector with a massive bill.

According to CAN, the new plan would:

* Abandon the mining void recently flooded by Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd. This could reach 1.14 million cubic metres of mine water – or, adjusting for the potential effects of climate change, 1.5 million cubic metres of mine water. The flooded void could reach an elevation of 286 metres. The closest edge of the flooded void to inhabitants’ homes is 320 metres.

* Leave behind three coal tips that comprise a total of 37m square metres of colliery spoil, soil, and other material. These coal tips tower above nearby residents of Merthyr Tydfil by up to 210 metres. The closest edge of tip 1 is just 600 metres from inhabitants’ homes and has already suffered substantial collapse on one side.

* Leave an excavated and exposed coal face cliff with a sheer drop of around 150 metres into the flooded void.

Objections

Now NRW has set out its further objections to the planning application.

It states: “We continue to have concerns with the application as submitted because inadequate information has been provided in support of the proposal. To overcome  these concerns, you [Merthyr council] should seek further information from the applicant regarding land contamination and pollution prevention. If this information is not provided, we would object to this planning application.

“We also advise that based on the information submitted to date, conditions regarding European protected species [the Great Crested Newt] should be attached to any planning  permission granted. Without the inclusion of these conditions we would object to this planning application.”

NRW states: “We note that the applicant has suggested the production of an Environmental Management Plan to either be agreed during the application process or to be conditioned to any grant of planning permission. We would be open to either option, however please note that any Environmental Monitoring Plan should include the following:

• Location of monitoring site and type of feature being monitored.

• Frequency and method of measurements – e.g. logger collection, manual measurement, observation. Monthly/quarterly etc.

• Triggers to action mitigation and contingency measures if there is risk of impact on the local environment.

• Mitigation and contingency measures.

• Duration of the monitoring.”

The letter goes on to repeat previously expressed concerns relating to land contamination and the need for more robust pollution prevention measures.

Changes

An earlier letter from NRW stated: “There have already been substantial changes to the ecology, hydrology and hydrogeology of the site prior to this date as a result of mining activities.

“We note that the sampling undertaken on site has identified elevated concentrations of some heavy metals and ammonia in the void and in water around the site, which are said to be treated by the onsite lagoons. It is therefore crucial that these lagoons are managed and monitored into the future, or a suitable alternative is proposed.

“Site drainage has not been adequately addressed within the application. From the information submitted, we have concerns regarding a potentially significant amount of surface water being funnelled into the void.”

The latest letter concludes: “We advise the applicant that, in addition to planning permission, it is their responsibility to ensure they secure all other permits/consents/licences relevant to their development.”

A spokesperson for Merthyr council said: “Information required to determine the application is still being delivered to the council by Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd. Once the information has been received the planning department will need to consider all the information before it.

“Any planning application will be determined on its own individual merits.

“All material factors from a planning perspective will be taken into account when determining the application.

“The council’s powers in relation to non-compliance within a planning application are laid out within the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as amended.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brychan
Brychan
29 days ago

Prior to open cast mining it was a coal tip, a barren wasteland of centuries of underground but shallow mining. We can see the site in 2008 prior to open cast operations. .webp The proposal is not restoration and that was not the deal. A new landscape was proposed. All escrow cash was handed over to Merthyr council as specified. This sum was specified by the Welsh government with the proposed landscaping is shown here. If there’s not enough cash in the kitty to do it, then the Labour Welsh Government should come clean, and admit they have let the… Read more »

Evan Aled Bayton
Evan Aled Bayton
29 days ago

Bad organisation from Day1

Garycymru
Garycymru
29 days ago

The owner is a well known and established crook, he should restore it as agreed or do time.
NRW needs to step up its game and stop Wales bring destroyed by dodgy people with money.

Dewi Davies
Dewi Davies
29 days ago

To go slightly off key.When the site was originally proposed Miller Argent (the original miners of the site)allegedly paid the Crawshay family £1million for the mining rights.This is common knowledge in Merthyr. Why did the Crawshays have any rights to the land and how much money have they extracted since.Given the misery and deprivation that that family caused in Merthyr it adds insult to injury to the people of Merthyr.

Brychan
Brychan
28 days ago
Reply to  Dewi Davies

Since nationalisation in 1946 all mining rights to underground coal in Wales belongs to the crown. However, the Crawshays had longstanding rights over the surface of the land as the previous ironmaster uses the site as a waste tip for over a century of s**g dumping. The site was not countryside prior to opencast operations as some pundits claim.

Dewi Davies
Dewi Davies
28 days ago
Reply to  Brychan

Thank you for that information

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
29 days ago

More abuse of our countryside without consequence. Besides this crooked company , Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd, reneging on a promise to restore the land , they also illegally mined for 15 months. Why are they still able to trade? They should have their assets seized and company wound down. But imagine the damage Reform UK would do to Wales if they ever held the reigns of power, be it Senedd or Westminster? Chilling. They’ve already stated they favour reopening the scars and wounds of our industrial past. Nigel Farage not only wants to reindustrialise Wales, but if and when in… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
28 days ago
Reply to  Y Cymro

It was a Labour Government who appointed a Labour peer to be chairman of the NCB at the time of Aberfan. It is a Labour Government, today in Westminster, who has refused to full fund the removal legacy coal tips in South Wales with the grovelling Labour First Minister who has accepted that position. 

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.