Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

‘Only one from Wales’: Hereditary peers system under fire for favouring London and South East

03 Dec 2021 3 minute read
Lord Grocott speaking in the House of Lords

The tradition of selecting members of the House of Lords on the basis of their ancestry has been criticised for favouring peers from London and the south-east of England over Wales and other parts of the UK.

Speaking in Westminster’s upper chamber today, Lord Grocott argued that among hereditary peers there was “one Peer from Wales, the West Midlands and the north-east combined and there are 19 from London and the south-east”.

His argument came amid a fresh bid to end the guaranteed representation of aristocrats in Parliament, with a Bill to scrap the practice of hereditary peer by-elections returning. At the moment hereditary peers can be given seats for life through a vote of a handful of other hereditary peers.

There are 92 hereditary peers in the House of Lords, meaning that in 2021, around 11% of the second chamber’s lawmakers are there purely down to the circumstance of their birth.

Lord Grocott’s Bill had its Second Reading in the Lords on Friday, but another Lord present argued that Hereditary Peers were in fact a way of counterbalancing the London-domination of the Lords.

“It is also true that the continued presence of hereditary Peers contributes to a slightly more diverse geographical spread in what is an overwhelmingly metropolitan House,” Viscount Trenchard said during the debate.

“The noble Lord, Lord Grocott, forgot that my noble friend Lord Harlech comes from Wales and that my noble friend Lord Ridley hails from the north-east.”

‘Archaic’

This year has seen seven new aristocrats elected to the Lords, the most recent being Lord Hacking who took his seat earlier this month.

In July the Viscount Stansgate, son of former Labour MP Tony Benn who famously renounced his peerage, joined the Lords in an uncontested election.

The Electoral Reform Society called for the government to back Lord Grocott’s Bill as a stepping-stone to real reform of the unelected second chamber.

“These by-elections are beyond satire. In the 21st Century a system where we have by-elections for just 92 places in the House of Lords in where only hereditary peers can stand and only peers can vote cannot be taken seriously,” Lord Grocott said.

“There have been seven new peers ‘elected’ this year alone – more than any other year since they were introduced in 1999. I’d love to think that with support, this bill could mean that they will be the last.”

Darren Hughes, Chief Executive, Electoral Reform Society said that it was “shocking” that in 2021, hereditary aristocrats were still guaranteed representation at Westminster.

“Unelected Lords given seats for life to vote on our laws because of nothing more than the circumstance of their birth – leaving ordinary voters with no say at all,” he said.

“What’s worse is that repeated attempts to phase this archaic practice out have been blocked by those same unelected, unaccountable and out of touch aristocrats who continue to benefit from it.

“This bill should be uncontroversial – a common-sense reform that would be a small step forward in modernising this our second chamber. Failing to back this modest change would be a spectacular own goal for both ministers and the 800-odd Lords.

“It’s time we got serious about modernising our politics. This bill is a chance for the government to get to grips with this out-of-touch chamber and begin on the path of real reform – scrapping this private members’ club and replacing it with a fairly-elected senate of the whole UK is the only way forward.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard
Richard
1 year ago

Bruce is quite right on the numbers from Wales……………from his former seat in Telford he had good links to y canolbarth through its host of welsh exile councillors based around him.

We need however to ask ourselves whether we should be nominating “ Lords “ in 2022 ?

Steve Duggan
Steve Duggan
1 year ago

The Lords should be abolished and an elected chamber put in its place. But of course it wont be for it’s an easy way for UK political parties, in power, to gain large donations. £3m – no problems here’s your peerage ! It’s just one example of the corruption rife in Westminster.

Geoff Horton-Jones
Geoff Horton-Jones
1 year ago

The House of Lords is an English institution
.If they want to keep it its their problem

Lets not waste our valuable Welsh breath talking about it.

Quornby
Quornby
11 months ago

It’s not just breath, it’s money and misspent influence that effects Wales as well.

Quornby
Quornby
11 months ago

FFS there are STILL heredity peers in 2021???? I thought this was the UK not Saudi Arabia.

Malcolm rj
Malcolm rj
11 months ago

When Lord Neal kinock was a young MP he was always banging on about the house of Lords should be disbanded for not being democratic what is he know SAY NO MORE

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.