Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Peers want to force referendum to stop Chagos Islands handover deal

16 Nov 2024 4 minute read
An aerial photo of Diego Garcia

A group of Lords wants to force a referendum over the handover of the Chagos Islands, in a move that could delay the treaty from taking effect until after US President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

Lord Bellingham is leading a group of peers who plan to introduce an amendment to the treaty when it reaches the House of Lords to require a vote of Chagossians to approve it.

US President Joe Biden’s administration agreed the deal with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s Government, but Mr Trump’s team is reportedly opposed to it and could look for a way to scrap it.

“The Government have promised there was going to be consultation of the Chagossians, but that is not happening,” Lord Bellingham, who was minister for overseas territories under former prime minister David Cameron, told the PA news agency.

Anger

He said he had seen a “huge amount of anger” among the Chagossian community in the UK.

“I think the whole thing is deeply concerning, and I think the Government have a lot of explaining to do, and opinion in the Lords is beginning to harden.

“I think that the Conservatives are absolutely 100% determined to stop this and I think a lot of crossbenchers and a lot of non-affiliated peers are the same.”

Lord Bellingham said the Government has shown “absolutely no sign” of how they plan to consult Chagossians.

He said: “And the only way to consult them is actually to have a referendum, because they’re spread out in different places, and they’ve made no effort really.”

Some 3,500 Chagossians are thought to live in the UK. Holding a referendum would require the Government to hold an international advertising campaign to make sure as many Chagossians as possible are aware of the vote.

Timeline

The timeline for the treaty to go through Parliament is not yet clear, but the Government has said it will be put before the House for scrutiny after it is signed, which was planned for after the Mauritian elections.

Veteran Mauritian politician Navin Ramgoolam was sworn in as prime minister this week after a decade out of power.

“There’s a new government in Mauritius that don’t like this treaty anyway, and they need to be told in no uncertain terms that this is going to be paused, and the Government are not going to put it through Parliament.

“If they do try and put it through Parliament then what we’ll do is we will use parliamentary procedure to add a provision to the treaty to allow for a referendum,” Lord Bellingham said.

The UK Government announced its decision to relinquish sovereignty over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius last month, which it said “saved” the UK-US military base on Diego Garcia, one of the cluster of islands in the Indian Ocean archipelago.

The deal over the continued military presence on Diego Garcia is expected to run for 99 years with an option to renew, with Britain paying a regular annual sum of money.

The UK entered negotiations under the previous Tory government with Mauritius over the future of the Chagos Islands after international pressure.

The United Nations’ highest court, the International Court of Justice, had ruled the UK’s administration of the territory was “unlawful” and must end after two centuries of British control.

The Chagos Islands have been in British hands for more than 200 years, but after Mauritius gained independence from France in the late 1960s, the inhabitants of the islands were forcibly expelled to make way for the base.

The Foreign Office has been contacted for comment.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Catherine Hodgkinson
Catherine Hodgkinson
1 month ago

The article states that Mauritius was a French colony but it was actually British from1810 until independence in 1968.

A.Redman
A.Redman
1 month ago

Of course there should be a referendum especially as it is a barrier against Chinese exploitation.

Rob
Rob
1 month ago
Reply to  A.Redman

Did Hong Kong have a referendum when it was given to China in 1997?

S Duggan
S Duggan
1 month ago

I agree the Chagossians should have a say – but I’m sinical about conservative motives here, why all of a sudden have they found a conscience? Does it happen to have something to do with Trumps stance, I wonder? Why does he not support the UN resolution? Could it possibly be he’s putting America first again and is more concerned about the UK/US base than the say of the ejected population? – Probably.

Paul ap Gareth
Paul ap Gareth
1 month ago

Who is going to be voting in this referendum?
Referendums (like Falkland Island sovereignty referendum 2013, and Gibraltar sovereignty referendum 2003) are only voted on by people who live in the territory. Since the forced deportations were completed in 1973 there is no-one there.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.