Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Prime Minister warns rioters ‘you will regret it’ as mosques offered emergency support

04 Aug 2024 5 minute read
A car burns on Parliament Road, in Middlesbrough, during an anti-immigration protest. Photo Owen Humphreys/PA Wire

Keir Starmer vowed rioters would “regret” engaging in “far-right thuggery” after a sixth day of escalating violence in England as the Government announced emergency security for mosques amid the threat of further disorder.

In a televised address to the nation, the Prime Minister condemned an attack on a hotel housing asylum seekers in Rotherham and promised those involved in unrest would “face the full force of the law”.

Speaking from Downing Street, Sir Keir suggested that rioters taking to the streets, and those “whipping up this action online and then running away themselves,” would face consequences.

Meanwhile, the Home Office announced mosques would be offered greater protection under a new “rapid response process” designed to quickly tackle the threat of further attacks on places of worship.

“People in this country have a right to be safe, and yet we’ve seen Muslim communities targeted, attacks on mosques,” the Prime Minister said on Sunday.

“Other minority communities singled out, Nazi salutes in the street, attacks on the police, wanton violence alongside racist rhetoric, so no, I won’t shy away from calling it what it is: far-right thuggery.”

Response

Sir Keir indicated the response to the violence could mirror elements of how the 2011 riots were handled, at which time he was director of public prosecutions.

“We do have standing arrangements for law enforcement which means that we can get arrests, charge remanded in custody and convictions done very quickly,” he said.

“I myself was part of that in 2011 when I was director of public prosecutions, and I’m determined we will do whatever it takes to bring these thugs to justice as quickly as possible.”

Ministers have suggested that courts could sit 24 hours to fast-track prosecutions – as they did in 2011 – while police forces have measures in place to draft in extra officers to tackle potential unrest.

It comes as anti-immigration rioters attacked police and smashed the windows of a hotel in Rotherham as the atmosphere turned increasingly febrile on the sixth day of unrest in England.

Masked men

Masked men launched lengths of wood and sprayed fire extinguishers at officers outside a Holiday Inn Express, with some storming past a police line and into the ground floor, which was set on fire during the disorder.

A police helicopter circled overhead, and at least one injured officer in riot gear was carried away.

Meanwhile,a group of rioters in Middlesbrough smashed the windows of houses and cars and hurled objects at officers on Sunday afternoon, with one seen shouting a racial slur and another telling police: “It’s our f****** country.”

It follows similar scenes of unrest in Southport, Belfast, Hartlepool, Hull, Liverpool, Stoke-on-Trent, Nottingham, Sunderland and elsewhere earlier in the week.

Cleveland Police has said nine arrests have been made so far.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the deliberate torching of a hotel where people were known to be inside was “utterly appalling” and South Yorkshire Police have Government backing to take “the strongest action”.

Mosques

The Home Office on Sunday offered mosques greater protections as part of a new process, under which it said “rapid security” deployment can be requested in order to allow a return to worship as fast as possible.

Violence has broken out in parts of England and Northern Ireland following the killing of three young girls in Southport on Monday, with 147 arrests made since Saturday alone.

17-year-old Axel Rudakubana is accused of the attack, but false claims spread online that the suspect was an asylum seeker who had travelled to the UK by boat.

The far right have been widely condemned as the organising force behind the subsequent unrest, which has seen bricks pelted at police officers, community facilities including a library set on fire, mosques attacked and shops looted.

Ms Cooper said: “Britain is a proud and tolerant country, and nobody should make any excuses for the shameful actions of the hooligans, thugs and extremist groups who have been attacking police officers, looting local shops or attacking people based on the colour of their skin.

“In light of the disgraceful threats and attacks that local mosques have also faced in many communities, the Government is providing rapid additional support through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme, alongside the support from local police forces and we repeat that anyone involved in this disorder and violence will face the full force of the law.

“As a nation we will not tolerate criminal behaviour, dangerous extremism, and racist attacks that go against everything our country stands for.”

Sir Keir said he wanted those who “feel targeted because of the colour of their skin” to know “this violent mob do not represent our country”.

Unrest

Forces are bracing for further unrest, with Greater Manchester Police issuing a Section 60AA order in Bolton requiring people to “remove face coverings used to disguise or conceal their appearance” which will stay in force until 10pm.

The widespread unrest poses the biggest challenge yet to Sir Keir’s premiership, with MPs including Ian Byrne and Dame Priti Patel saying Parliament should be recalled as it was in 2011 so the Commons could debate the riots.

Ministers have so far said they have been reassured by police that forces have the resources they need to respond to the violence.

The Police Federation for England and Wales has voiced concerns that officers will be left unable to attend other incidents as they focus efforts on quelling the disorder, warning “there is a cost to all this”.

Deputy chairman of the federation Brian Booth told the PA news agency: “Every day this continues means a certain amount of officer hours are being taken away from other policing duties. It has a massive effect on already significant under-resourcing.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dai Ponty
Dai Ponty
4 months ago

Other than Belfast who have been used to this rioting for years not recently its the English towns and cities that are tearing themselves apart its like they want to destroy everything its in their barbaric D N A Saxon Jute Angles and viking the barbaric savage is coming out in them

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
4 months ago
Reply to  Dai Ponty

You will be having a go at calico and curves next Dai and there is a lot of Viking blood up here, mate…

Llyn
Llyn
4 months ago

Meanwhile the Shadow Welsh Secretary Lord Davies of Gower has said that the racist attacks on mosques and hotels, racist chanting, attacks on the police, looting and nazi salutes are all “politically justified”

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
4 months ago

He must mean Tommy and Farage, the latest Spiv and Minder tribute act in the Mosley tradition…

Linda Jones
Linda Jones
4 months ago

Very sad. Shame politicians didnt listen to the concerns of working people. Concerns about the cost of living, lack of housing, poor NHS service and mass immigration etc have been gaslighted and ignored. Little wonder frustration and anger were festering ready to explode once a catalyst appeared, albeit a false one in this instance. I would suggest writing off those rioting as mere right wing thugs is yet another attempt to gaslight. Shame politicians dont use their power to alleviate the hell that is the life of many in the UK today. Riots happen when people feel their backs are… Read more »

Llyn
Llyn
4 months ago
Reply to  Linda Jones

“I would suggest writing off those rioting as mere right wing thugs is yet another attempt to gaslight”. No those who attack mosques, hotels with asylum seekers, attack people of colour, shout racist abuse, attack the police, loot, make Nazi salutes, are members of far-right groups are far-right thugs.

Jeff
Jeff
4 months ago
Reply to  Linda Jones

I am writing them ff exactly for what they are. If you don’t want to be labeled a racist thug then don’t do racist thug things. One senior welsh Tory seems intent on stoking hate even to the extent of publishing stuff after the initial riots and even repeating some tropes, he could deal with it in his office but is using twitter. Reform is also up there as an issue. None of this is a cost of living demo. They don’t do it in my name. None of it I could condone in my name…….. Ever. The party that… Read more »

George Duncan Stewart
George Duncan Stewart
4 months ago

One thing we should as quickly as possible is to implement Ian Hislop’s recommendation that social media are classed as publishers
PUBLISHERS who can see what their users are posting and therefore are ’responsible for the content.
Incitement to criminal acts e should be as much the responsibility of the publisher as those posting this stuff.
As for “free speech”:
Free speech does not extend to calling out “fire!” In a crowed theatre causing a stampede and people dying in the resultant crush

John Ellis
John Ellis
4 months ago

While I agree in principle absolutely, I rather fear that that what you suggest is easier said than done. Most of these ‘publishers’ are headquartered in the USA, and they’ll simply rush to cite the ‘first amendment’ of the US constitution.

blc
blc
4 months ago
Reply to  John Ellis

The first amendment does not protect organisations and companies. It exists to prevent the interference of the state, not to allow people to use whatever means they want to spread their message. It is “freedom of speech”, not “freedom from consequences”. If someone turned up at their local Costco supermarket with a megaphone and started preaching a message of hate, Costco can rightfully turf them out without anyone’s first amendment rights being infringed. Similarly, if someone is using a software platform in a manner that contravenes the usage agreement of that platform, then they can rightfully have their access to… Read more »

John Ellis
John Ellis
4 months ago
Reply to  blc

You’re clearly better up on the specific implications of that ‘first amendment’ than I am, but it rather looks as if we’re not disagreeing overmuch about how, in practice, appeals for social responsibility are likely to be received by the likes of Musk!

blc
blc
4 months ago
Reply to  John Ellis

It’s an unfortunate consequence of being in a 17 year relationship with a politics graduate… I know far *far* more about politics and the political systems of the US and UK than I could have ever imagined!

John Ellis
John Ellis
4 months ago
Reply to  blc

Well, clearly the relationship has some upsides in terms of broadening knowledge!

Personally, while I’m fairly well up on how the political systems within the nations of the UK operate, and I’m more generally aware of how such things work in neighbouring western European nations, the labyrinthine constitutional functioning of the USA still very considerable eludes me.

CapM
CapM
4 months ago
Reply to  blc

“Elon Musk’s ownership of Twitter (I refuse to call it by the current name)”

I refer to it as Xcrement.
Before as Sh!tter

John Ellis
John Ellis
4 months ago
Reply to  CapM

Agree. I’ve always kept away from it. Same with Facebook.

CapM
CapM
4 months ago
Reply to  John Ellis

@rsebook!

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.