Protest against plan to scrap jury trials

Martin Shipton
A protest was held outside Cardiff Crown Court to highlight concerns about the ending of jury trials for many offences.
It was one of 30 demonstrations outside courts across Wales and England against the UK Government’s plans, seen by many as the dismantling of an 800-years-old cornerstone of the British constitution.
The Jury Alliance argues that juries are a fundamentally local issue, made up of 12 randomly selected local people. They reflect the local community and provide a vital, common-sense check on the law.
Anne Ross, 69, a social worker in south east Wales, was one of those taking part in the protest outside Cardiff Crown Court.
She said: “I am here with others to raise awareness of the UK Government proposals to end jury service for a significant number of cases. I don’t think the general public have been told about the magnitude of this. Juries come from the communities we live and work in and the idea of a single judge making deliberations is likely to lead to an unbalanced assessment of all the facts.
“I work with vulnerable young people and adults from areas of neglect and deprivation that are alien to the lived experience of the average judge.”
The Jury Alliance is a new public campaigning group, aiming to raise public awareness and demonstrate the strength of public opposition to the government’s plans to limit trial by jury.
Since UK Justice Secretary David Lammy’s announcement in December 2025 that the right to trial by jury would be removed from tens of thousands of cases, in order to reduce the backlog crisis in the criminal justice system, the government continues to rush through this new legislation.
If passed, the Courts and Tribunals Bill, currently at the Report stage, will see a single judge replacing a jury for all cases in the Crown Court where a prison sentence of three years or less is expected.
Flora Page KC, the barrister who overturned wrongful convictions in the Post Office Horizon scandal, recently resigned from the Legal Services Board, the independent regulator of legal services in England and Wales so she could oppose the changes.
‘Cynical’
In her resignation letter to Mr Lammy she said: “I am sorry to say that I believe the backlog is a cynical cover, something that the officials have worked on intentionally to give you and Ms Sackman [Sarah Sackman, the Minister of State for Courts and Legal Services] the ammunition you feel you need to take aim at jury trial. You should be ashamed of yourselves.”
Sir Geoffrey Cox KC – a practising criminal barrister of 44 years – told the House of Commons during the second reading debate: “Jury trial is the most powerful instrument and engine of social justice that this country has ever invented. It is a safeguard against oppression. It is a built-in defence against establishment and administrative power … At a time when our institutions are under unprecedented attack, is now the time to transfer a massive trunk of the administration of criminal justice to a representative who will unquestionably be seen as a representative of the state?”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Truly shocking move and one that Labour would have opposed if Tories tried it. Yet another worrying step backwards in individual rights.
This is an good argument for Welsh independence from a Rightwing view. Jury trials are a bedrock of our common heritage and our ancestral rights. If Labour’s progressive Britain will not uphold our traditions and ethics, a Welsh state could.
Wrong response for the Tory gutting of the legal service in the UK.
As usual, we have an English Justice Secretary, David Lammy, foisting this undemocratic change on the people of Wales, while Scotland and Northern Ireland are shielded because they control their own criminal justice systems. And it is no good having piecemeal devolution, such as “some control” over youth justice funding, because it is not only cynical but very patronising to Wales. We were codifying Welsh law as early as 950 AD—just 23 years after England became a country in 927 AD and 288 years before the Anglo‑Norman scribes created the 1215 Magna Carta. Our Laws of Hywel Dda pre‑dated that,… Read more »
As I was reading the article, my head was steaming with the thoughts of Cyfraith Hywel, and its influence on the current laws, not just in the current UK.
I don’t really have anything to add other than, diolch!
Yes, and the irony with Cyfraith Hywel was that Welsh woman had more rights in Wales than in any other part of medieval Europe until they were removed by England.
The 1215 Magna Carta actually enshrined Welsh law until this was removed by vested interests in later versions.
Actually, the Magna Carta did not enshrine Welsh law; it merely acknowledged it alongside English and Marcher law in certain land disputes. My initial point was that Wales was codifying law when the foundations of the English state were still wet, yet the British establishment at Westminster continue to patronise Wales by claiming we are incapable of controlling our own criminal justice system when the likes Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man and Gibraltar, can, which is rediculous.
Which is essentially devolution of justice, affirmed in a foundational constitutional document Westminster holds dear. This flies in the face of those that believe devolution is a modern aberration that needs to be abolished to restore the natural order.
Digital ID cards for adults. Facial recognition in the streets. No jury trials. Jail for parents for the crimes of their children. Armed arrest for writing a joke. More restrictions on free speech. And yet removing the penalty for shoplifting.
Starmer claims to have been a human rights lawyer. Is that why all the steps we are taking are towards dictatorship?
Jury trials as some ancient right to protect ordinary people is a complete myth. They were the elite protecting their own interests. It wasn’t until the 1970s that juries were genuinely ordinary citizens.
Labour will create a hundred more Andrew Malkinsons so they can appear “tough” on crime. Increasing the number of miscarriages of justice is their top priority.