Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Rachel Reeves fails to rule out future tax rises as economy shrinks

12 Jun 2025 4 minute read
Screen grab of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivers her Government’s spending review to MPs in the House of Commons, London. Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire

Rachel Reeves failed to rule out further tax rises in the autumn as new figures showed the economy shrank more than expected in April.

The Chancellor has repeatedly said that the cost of Wednesday’s spending review is covered by the tax rises she brought in last year, saying departments must now “live within their means”.

But economists have warned that a weakening economy and additional commitments such as reversing much of the cut to winter fuel payments mean taxes are likely to go up again in the autumn.

Asked on Thursday whether she could guarantee there would be no further tax rises, Ms Reeves told LBC: “I think it would be very risky for a Chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours.”

But she again repeated her promise that she would not need to increase taxes on the same scale as last year, when she put them up by £40 billion.

And she rejected the suggestion that she was a “Klarna Chancellor” who had announced a “buy now, pay later” spending review.

She said: “The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I’m going to need to pay for in the future, that’s just not right.”

Shrinking economy

Her comments come as the Office for National Statistics reported that the economy shrank by 0.3% in April – the biggest monthly contraction since October 2023 and worse than the 0.1% fall most economists had expected.

In recent days, both Ms Reeves and Number 10 have said the economy is beginning to turn a corner, allowing them to fund the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance.

But Thursday’s worse-than-expected economic news will make it harder for Ms Reeves to balance her spending commitments with Labour’s promises on tax and borrowing.

The Chancellor acknowledged that the reduction in GDP was “disappointing”, and blamed “uncertainty” caused by Donald Trump’s announcement of sweeping tariffs at the start of April for much of the fall.

But opposition parties have laid the blame squarely with the Government, with Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride accusing Ms Reeves of “economic vandalism”.

He said: “Under Labour, we have seen taxes hiked, inflation almost double, unemployment rise, and growth fall. With more taxes coming, things will only get worse and hard-working people will pay the price.”

“Wake-up call”

Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats’ Treasury spokeswoman, said the figures should act as “a wake-up call for the Government which has so far refused to listen to the small businesses struggling to cope with the jobs tax” and urged ministers to pursue a “bespoke UK-EU customs union” to compensate for the impact of US tariffs.

The GDP figures come a day after the Chancellor revealed her spending plans for the coming years, including a significant increase in spending on the NHS, defence and schools.

The biggest winner was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms, leading the Resolution Foundation’s Ruth Curtice to say Britain was slowly morphing into a “National Health State”.

But that rise came at the price of real-terms cuts elsewhere, including the Home Office, the Department for Transport and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

On Thursday, Ms Reeves rejected claims that her decision on policing, which will see forces’ “spending power” increase by 2.3% above inflation each year, would mean cuts to frontline police numbers.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Adrian
Adrian
23 days ago

Well of course – I would hope that everyone realises the government doesn’t actually have any of its own money.

David Richards
David Richards
23 days ago
Reply to  Adrian

Where do you think the money for the nhs comes from? The alternative is a insurance based US style ‘health system’. (result being 50 million people in the US don’t have healthcare).

David Richards
David Richards
23 days ago

If we want decent public services we have to be prepared to pay for them, and the resources to finance things like the NHS, local government, defence, education and welfare payments invariably has to come from general taxation. A depressing feature of modern political life is the way in which the thatcherite notion that taxation is a bad thing has been allowed to go unchallenged, with the case for progressive taxation largely being abandoned by parties even on the left. And weve seen this in Wales where – despite our Senedd having the powers to vary income taxes for a… Read more »

Jeff
Jeff
23 days ago

I would have thought that 14 years inc Johnson and Truss came with a price for the UK, that and brexit. Pretty deep hole to dig out of.

Only way is back to the EU, leavers are a minority, take them on.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.