Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Row breaks out as National Trust tries to block access to part of Wales Coast Path

28 May 2026 6 minute read
The Wales Coast Path at Ceibwr Bay

Martin Shipton

Solicitors acting for the National Trust claim the charity owns part of the Wales Coast Path and is threatening to sue for trespass a small adventure company that has operated in the area for more than 30 years.

According to the Trust’s Cambridge-based solicitors, it has no need to justify denying access to land at Ceibwr Bay in the Pembrokeshire Coast National Park.

A trespass notice has been served on Adventure Beyond, a Welsh coasteering company.

In a letter dated 22 May 2026, Birketts LLP stated that the National Trust “does not need to justify their decision” and that, as “private landowners,” the Trust may restrict use of the land “as they see fit.” The letter further asserts there is “no statutory public right of access” to the land and that “any access is by permission only.”

The land the National Trust is claiming as fully private is part of the Wales Coast Path. The 2009 Act which created the path also established a coastal margin – the open land between the path and the sea – as a zone of public access. At Ceibwr there are no fences, no divisions, no private enclosures: the entire headland from road to cliff edge is path and coastal margin.

According to Adventure Beyond, for a charity to assert that this land is private, that there is no statutory right of access, and that it needs give no reason for refusing entry, is not merely a local dispute. It is a direct challenge to the public’s right of access along the entire length of the Wales Coast Path.

The land in question has a particular history. In 1984, Wynford Vaughan Thomas – one of Wales’ most celebrated broadcasters – gifted it to the National Trust. The Trust’s own stated purpose is to preserve land of natural beauty permanently for the benefit of the nation.

When Adventure Beyond wrote to Birketts on 25 May 2026 pointing out that the Wales Coast Path runs through the land and requiring the trespass notice to be corrected, Birketts replied that their instructing officer was on holiday and that they would respond “where we consider it appropriate to do so”. The Wales Coast Path point has not been addressed.

A referral has been made to Natural Resources Wales and Members of the Senedd representing Ceredigion Penfro have been notified.

Thrill

Jethro Moore, who runs Adventure Beyond, said: “My family have been in Pembrokeshire for generations. I came here as a small child and I have never left. I know every rock, every current, every cave at Ceibwr. I’ve been taking people into that sea for 30 years – not just to experience the thrill of it, but to understand it.

“I teach people how to be safe on this coastline, how to read the sea, and how to respect the wildlife around them. I bring people here who would never otherwise experience a place like this – people recovering from trauma, young people finding something that changes how they see the natural world. This place belongs to all of us.”

Adventure Beyond is a professional coasteering operator holding all relevant qualifications. It operates in accordance with the Pembrokeshire Coasteering Concordat.

The Wales Coast Path is an 870-mile statutory coastal route around Wales, established under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 and opened in 2012. It is designated as a National Trail.

Pembrokeshire Coast National Park

Ceibwr Bay lies within the Pembrokeshire Coast National Park and forms part of the Aberarth–Carreg Wylan SSSI and Cardigan Bay Marine Special Area of Conservation. It is widely regarded as one of the finest stretches of the Welsh coastline.

Birketts letter to Adventure Beyond states: “Until recently, Adventure Beyond accessed the land for the purpose of undertaking organised commercial coasteering activities pursuant to an oral permission granted by our client on a telephone call between our client’s Mark Underhill (Restore Nature Delivery Manager) and your Jethro Moore on 20 May 2025. That permission was expressly withdrawn with effect from 31 March 2026 in an email from Mr Underhill to Mr Moore dated 31 March 2026 (09:38).

“For the avoidance of doubt, from that date you have had, and continue to have, no right whatsoever to enter or use the land for commercial coasteering or for any other commercial purpose. Our client does not need to justify their decision in this respect – they are private landowners and are entitled to regulate and restrict the use of the land as they see fit.

“Contrary to your assertions and following a close review of status of the land with our client, the land is not registered open access land under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 or registered common land. Section 4(2) of the National Trust Act 1907 grants full powers of ownership to the National Trust to manage its land and accordingly the National Trust may grant or restrict access. There is therefore no statutory public right of access as you seek to assert and any access is by permission only.

“Our client has instructed us that, notwithstanding that the oral permission has been expressly withdrawn, Adventure Beyond continues to access and use the land for organised commercial coasteering activities. Such conduct is entirely unauthorised.

TAKE NOTICE that:

1. Any continued entry onto the land by Adventure Beyond, its employees, agents, or clients by any means for commercial coasteering purposes constitutes trespass; and

2. You are required to cease immediately all access to and use of the land for commercial coasteering or any associated commercial activity.

The National Trust expressly reserves all its rights in respect of:

1. Your ongoing conduct in continuing to access the land without permission; and

2. The allegations made by Adventure Beyond against the National Trust in your recent correspondence, all of which are denied.

“Any claims or reports that you seek to make / bring to the Charity Commission or elsewhere will be vigorously defended.”

A National Trust Cymru spokesperson said: “Whilst there is an ongoing legal dispute it would not be appropriate to comment in detail on this matter.

“However, we’d like to assure people that we are in no way restricting the public’s legal rights to use the Wales Coast Path.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Glaves
Richard Glaves
21 days ago

It says it all The NT one of the biggest landowners and are entitled to regulate and restrict the use of the land as they see fit. I wonder why they changed their mind. As previously it seemed to be ok but they changed their minds must be something more to it. However The NT wants to restrict access to part of the The Wales Coast Path which happens to cross their land. This is a path which is designated a national trail giving access to everyone. I wonder what the view of the welsh government is on this matter.

Cadwgan
Cadwgan
20 days ago
Reply to  Richard Glaves

Richard, it does not seem clear from this report, but the coastal path is for walking and has most probably been kept open for that activity. Having the right , or privalage to walk upon the path does not give rights to do other things or to wander off the path. The NT appear to be proscribing other activities which also seem to need to get off the path.

Secondly the NT have no rights to the sea or the intertidal zone

Adrian Roberts
Adrian Roberts
15 days ago
Reply to  Cadwgan

The legislation that set up the Welsh Coast Path gives a right of access to the path and to the area between the path and the sea.

J Jones
J Jones
20 days ago

The problem here is that the National Trust is from another nation, a colonist nation with a long history of entitlement to walk over native people, even on foreign lands.

This ‘National Trust’ needs to be boycotted until they have no money for exorbitant legal bulling tactics, actions that would disgust the individual who gave them the land.

Fymarni
Fymarni
20 days ago

Why does Scotland have its own National Trust, and we have to be part of England’s? Time to split it please!

Paul
Paul
20 days ago
Reply to  Fymarni

Cadw ?

Last edited 20 days ago by Paul
Helena
Helena
16 days ago
Reply to  Paul

The equivalent to Cadw is English Heritage, (as a Cadw member you can get into English Heritage sites for half price in the first year and free from the second year) the National Trust is something different.

anon
anon
20 days ago
Reply to  Fymarni

Because it’s registered as a charity and charities have the two jurisdictions – Scotland and then England & Wales. England and Wales aren’t treated separately for charity purposes but Scotland is and has it’s own laws around them.

Pwnco
Pwnco
20 days ago

I do see these coasteering companies and adventure companies being a bit of a problem in regards to wildlife and delicate and sometimes rare plants being trampled on, there is also the effect of noise from the participants and my enjoyment aswell. There should possibly be a license access, so that the effect on the area of outstanding natural beauty is protected and the commercial venture is monitored and controlled if it must exist. When i go visiting places i like to have peace and see it unspoiled to see Wildlife not a load of screaming people. Whilst the argument… Read more »

Lynda
Lynda
19 days ago
Reply to  Pwnco

Your comment shows a lack of knowledge of the area where this is going on. It is a beach area which has been accessable since the creation of the Pembrokeshire Coast Path, which predates the welsh Coast Path. It is accesssible by anyone abd the National Trust are trying to control that access,presumably to try to earn income from the access. The National Trust are not protecting nature they are trying to commercialise their own interests.

Jim
Jim
20 days ago

I think the headline is a little misleading.

Reading the letter from the solicitors it says that verbal permission was given to the coastering business to use part of the NT land. In March this year the permission was rescinded meaning the commercial coastering business could no longer use NT land. The letter was sent because the business carried on using NT land when they didn’t have permission any more.. At no point does it say that NT are going to stop people using the footpath.

Keith Arkley
Keith Arkley
19 days ago
Reply to  Jim

That’s my interpretation of the article.

Brychan
Brychan
20 days ago

There are sections of the Wales Coast Path which are not public rights of way but are deemed to be ‘permissive’. This where the landowner can withdraw access at any time. Classic examples are railway foot-crossings, fields containing crops/livestock and specifically sections in Pembrokeshire controlled by the MoD. Closed regularly with alternative routes signposted. The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 is a piece of Westminster legislation covering England and Wales with the Secretary of State under section41, not the Welsh Government, who makes designations. There is also an ‘over-ride’ of the Welsh Government relating to marine resources defined in… Read more »

Dom
Dom
20 days ago

Public access to walk a path can’t mean a free-for-all otherwise people would start living there.

Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
20 days ago

The point is really whether a commercial operation taking a large number of people into the water and over the rocks possibly a number of times a week, areas that would in the past have had very little human disturbance, is compatible with Ceibwr Bay forming part of the Aberarth–Carreg Wylan SSSI and Cardigan Bay Marine Special Area of Conservation. There are seals in using coves in the area so are they or nesting birds possibly being disturbed by the activity or potentially so. The NT does not appear to be saying that individuals cannot use the path, or use… Read more »

Nix
Nix
20 days ago

The National Trust ought to be about providing access to the countryside, not fencing it off and charging people to get in. If they don’t want to do that then they should hand it over to other charities who tun it for the public and for nature, not just for the well off and for profits. Most UK land is already privately owned and fenced off. Footpaths are quietly being hidden in hopes they’ll be forgotten. If National Parks are not for the Nation, who are they for? And as others have pointed out, it seems somewhat antagonistic for an… Read more »

David
David
20 days ago

Typical colonial attitude. Keep going
Jet! Don’t let the b****ds get you down. Boycott the National Trust.

Last edited 20 days ago by David
JoeMor
JoeMor
20 days ago

Abereiddy is also NT property and they had Redbull all over it for several years and now? It’s a carpark..

Keith Arkley
Keith Arkley
19 days ago

It looks like not everyone is being banned. Just those using it for commercial purposes.

Peter Evans
Peter Evans
19 days ago

First, it’s laughable a few people here are trying to frame this as a Nationalist issue and I say that as someone who is Welsh.

My guess is s that the issue is either the NT don’t like anybody else making money off their estate and/or the NT may have concerns about liability…

It will be interesting to see if the NT have the legal right to restrict access in this way…

Andrew Lamb
Andrew Lamb
12 days ago

I wrote this, on April 27th, in response the NT trying to force us into an access agreement for taking tourists to Rhossili, without which, we are effectively banned from all public access land at this location. https://walesoutdoors.substack.com/p/the-national-trust-believes-it-can

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.