Rowan Williams among notable names condemning ‘injustice’ of Just Stop Oil sentences
More than 1,200 artists, athletes and academics have condemned the “injustice” of sentences handed to five Just Stop Oil activists for peaceful protests.
In a letter to Attorney General Richard Hermer KC, the high-profile figures backed millionaire Labour donor Dale Vince and broadcaster Chris Packham’s call for an urgent meeting to discuss “the jailing of truth tellers and their silencing in court”.
It comes after Roger Hallam, 58, was jailed for five years after being found guilty of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance for his involvement in a protest that disrupted the M25 in London for more than four days in 2022.
Cressida Gethin, 22, Daniel Shaw, 38, Lucia Whittaker de Abreu, 35, and Louise Lancaster, 58, were jailed for four years over the demonstration, which saw 45 people climb on to gantries over the motorway.
Calls to intervene
The jail terms are thought to be the longest sentences ever given for peaceful protest and exceed those handed to two fellow Just Stop Oil protesters for scaling the Queen Elizabeth II Bridge on the Dartford Crossing in October 2022.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has faced calls to intervene in the case while UN human rights commissioner Volker Turk described the sentences as “deeply troubling”.
Artist Dame Tracey Emin, Coldplay frontman Chris Evans, film director Danny Boyle, author Sir Philip Pullman, singer Annie Lennox and actor Toby Jones were among those who signed the open letter in support of Mr Dale and Mr Packham, who called for the meeting with the Attorney General last week.
Others who put their name down included top human rights lawyer Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC, former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
They described the jail terms handed to the activists, known as the Whole Truth Five, as “one of the greatest injustices in a British court in modern history”.
The letter said: “With prisons at breaking point and the new government acting urgently to address this, how can these sentences be seen as anything other than insanity?
“The sentences, ranging from four to five years, are higher than those given to many who commit serious sexual assault.
“The defendants were denied the right to explain to a jury why they took the action they did, making a mockery of the right to a fair trial, with the judge saying that the Crown Prosecution’s agreed facts on climate collapse — including that the world has gone beyond 1.5C for 12 consecutive months — were neither here nor there.”
“Grave risk”
The signatories argued that the non-violent protesters were “fulfilling a necessary service by alerting the nation to the grave risk we all face, as scientists in their droves express their fear that many of the Earth’s systems are already at breaking point”.
During the trial at Southwark Crown Court, prosecutors alleged the M25 protests led to an economic cost of at least £765,000 while the cost to the Metropolitan Police was more than £1.1 million.
They also allegedly caused more than 50,000 hours of vehicle delay, affecting more than 700,000 vehicles, and left the M25 “compromised” for more than 120 hours.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
These sentences were way OTT. Same judge let police sex pests off and used policy part dictated by the policy exchange, his summing up says it all. Sounds like the Cons found themselves a tame hanging judge.
Unless of course the next farmers protest in Cardiff attracts the same sentencing. Next CSA rally is locked down, the list goes on. This was aimed by the nasty party when they were in power, I hope labour roll it back.
I’m all for the right to protest but it does not mean every fruitcake movement – and JSO is a fruitcake movement – gets to repeatedly ride roughshod over others’ daily lives with ever-escalating impact. The other protests you mention are not remotely comparable.
Going by this, those who took part in the 20mph protest convoys should get a least 6 months
…and no, I don’t think it would be right.
These sentences were absolutely appropriate considering the impact and cost on other people’s lives, not to mention the tax payer. Hallam, particularly, is a nihilistic loon: who knows what he may be capable of next? it just might land on you or your family. The total extent of the delay was calculated to be 50,856 hours. The vehicles affected were calculated to number 708,523. The economic cost was calculated to be £769,966, without even taking into account the cost of policing. People missed flights and funerals; mock exams were delayed; a child with special needs missed part of his school… Read more »
Totally agree, they received a relatively light sentence when the cost of their actions is considered.
The hold up would also have prevented criminals and potential criminals from committing crimes some with serious consequences for the victims and road users from being involved in collisions, some of which might well have been serious or even fatal.
Tony Dawson has done part of the sums and it looks like he’s completely overlooked the difficult bit.
I look forward to your carefully analysed corrective figures.
Swallow the hate mail wholew I see. fictional figures unproven are not evidence. how many less deaths on roads from slow vehicles. How many more got to wor kfrom hoem and less commuting. you see I can make up crap also. Meanwhile the planet burns and you seem the type to only notice if you suddenly was chocking on foul air
Well, I suppose if the planet’s burning there’s no point in learning to spell or punctuate.