Rupert Lowe confirms Nation.Cymru story about Reform MSs wanting to defect to his Restore Britain party

Martin Shipton
Rupert Lowe has confirmed that recently elected Reform UK Senedd Members have already been in touch about defecting to his Restore Britain party.
Minutes after Nation.Cymru published an article on the evening of June 9 quoting sources saying that disgruntled Reform MSs could form a Restore group if five of them defected, Lowe posted a message to X that said: “Contact has already been made to our party, but we are not just accepting anyone who tries it. Not worth it. They need to back our agenda.”
Lowe’s confirmation that an unspecified number of Reform MSs have enquired about defecting to Restore less than five weeks after being elected to the Senedd indicates that predictions of conflict within the Reform group made before the election were accurate.
An individual – not an MS – who has left Reform to join Restore told us: “As I understand it, a number of MSs elected for Reform are unhappy and are looking to leave the party. In some cases it’s because they have been passed over for promotion to the Shadow Cabinet, which would of course entitle them to higher salaries.
“Reform is a cult. Some members worship Nigel Farage as a god. They even dress like him. It is incredibly unhealthy, with loads of people with big egos all vying for position.
“I can honestly say that Restore Britain is nothing like that at all. The people in the party don’t have big egos and unlike in Reform I’ve seen no backstabbing. I think Rupert Lowe genuinely cares in a way Farage doesn’t. And having Elon Musk backing the party helps, obviously.”
Musk, who owns the social media channel X, formerly known as Twitter, fell out with Farage last year and switched his allegiance to Lowe after the MP for Great Yarmouth left Reform after being accused of bullying its then party chairman Zia Yusuf – an allegation strongly denied by Lowe and which the police took no action over.
While much of Lowe’s rupture with Farage appears to stem from a personality clash, Restore Britain takes an even stronger line on immigration than Reform. It advocates mass deportation of all illegal immigrants, claiming the removal of all of them could be achieved within three years.
There have been bitter fallings-out between supporters of the two far-right parties, focussed in recent weeks on the Makerfield by-election, due to take place on June 18. Labour’s candidate Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, has said he intends to challenge Keir Starmer for the party leadership if he becomes the MP for Makerfield. Winning the party leadership would lead to Burnham becoming Prime Minister.
‘Treachery’
Both Reform and Restore are fielding candidates in the by-election. A recent Survation poll put Burnham on 49% of the vote, with Reform’s candidate on 39% and Restore’s on 8%. Reform’s supporters accuse Lowe of “treachery” by not standing his candidate aside to give Reform a clear run against Burnham, but Lowe’s supporters claim to be making headway in the seat and claim that their man is “the real deal”.
On social media, Farage and Lowe supporters are reserving their greatest vitriol for each other. Meanwhile Burnham’s campaign team are becoming increasingly confident of victory.
In our June 9 article we explained what was likely to happen if a number of MSs left the 34-strong Reform group, which forms the Senedd’s official opposition to Plaid Cymru’s minority government, which holds 43 seats.
We checked the rules governing political groups to see whether it would be technically feasible for Restore UK to form a group of its own if some Reform MSs defected to it.
In the expanded Senedd, party groups can only be officially formed when at least five MSs join them. However, there is an expectation that groups should be formed by parties that have won at least one seat in the last Senedd election.
The Senedd’s standing orders state: “For the purposes of the Act [which increased the number of MSs from 60 to 96], a political group is: a group of at least five Members belonging to the same registered political party that won at least one seat at the previous Senedd election; or five or more Members not satisfying the criteria in Standing Order 1.3(i), who have notified the Presiding Officer of their wish to be regarded as a political group, and satisfied the Presiding Officer that exceptional circumstances apply.”
The standing order continues: “The Presiding Officer must issue guidance to Members under Standing Order 6.17 on the interpretation and application of Standing Order 1.3(ii). The Presiding Officer must decide any question as to whether any Member belongs to a political group or as to which political group he or she belongs.”
We asked the Senedd Commission about the latest guidance relating to when “exceptional circumstances” would apply, and whether it would be possible for a group composed of Members who did not stand for election under its banner to be formed.
A spokesperson for the Senedd Commission told us: “Examples of exceptional circumstances include, but are not limited to, a split in a registered political party, a national crisis, or a major event that changes political affiliations.”
Funding
This guidance was issued by the previous Presiding Officer Elin Jones in April 2026, and strongly suggests that a Restore group would be allowed, if at least five Reform MSs defected to it.
As well as speaking rights, the formation of a group leads to additional funding. A group of five MSs would be entitled to claim £300,000 per year to employ group support staff.
What happens next is unclear. While Lowe has confirmed that approaches have been made to his party by Reform MSs who would like to defect to it, he hasn’t explicitly stated whether any or all of those who have been in touch about defecting will be allowed to do so.
Regardless of that, Lowe’s confirmation of our story will send shockwaves through Reform in Wales.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Yusuf – out!
MacKinnon – out!
Sumner – out!
Powell – out!
Squeegee – out!
Anne Jones – out!
Get these people out of the right wing in Wales!
Will Squeegee have the people skills to stop these defections?
I stand by my previous comment elsewhere that there must be a by election for any defect moving to an unrepresented, unelected and non existent party in Y Senedd but if Restore are permitted to exist in there by brass neckedly strolling in, what fun? I fully expected over time that the numbers of the 34 Deformees would diminish through rulebreaking, corruption, anti human life hatred spewed out on social media posts and all round general hooligan thuggery but five members walking out a couple of months after an election? This is the proof, if any were needed, that they… Read more »
A couple of months? It’s not even that, if it happens this week it’s one month since they took their seats.
Correct but i was giving them time to sort their s••t out. Remember, they are the hard of thinking.
It fractures reform but heck, such a racist tranche in the Welsh Government, law makers, this is disgusting and a shame on the people that voted for them.
Amen!
‘Rats fighting in a sack’ springs to mind 😂😂😂😂 They will all implode soon hopefully and retreat to oblivion fom whence they came
With two thirds of the Reform shadow cabinet being former Tories this will be an itch the Reform rank and file back benches who have been overlooked for paid cabinet posts will not be able to stop scratching.
History is not a progressive arch. We are no better, and not worse, than the decades before Justinian the Great, who brough back the death penalty for foreign rapists. History continues, it is not moral or immoral.
Now that you can only effectively vote for parties in Wales (certainly not my favourite bit of the new voting system) this defection loophole needs to be closed.
To have people forming a party group in the Senedd that no-one voted for is extremely unconstitutional and undemocratic.
It’s probably too late to stop it this time but it should not be allowed to happen again.
Broadly I agree with you, but we should look upon developments like this with something akin to glee – any fracturing of the far-right has to be a good thing, as fragmented they represent less of a threat and more than likely will spend more time and energy in opposing each other than engaged in anything else.
Further fragmentation would be even better! The far right-right will never cease to be a threat, but at least if they are in small islolated groups they are easier to manage and suppress.
Talk of jumping to a party that did not even stand only a month after the Senedd election, is such an insult to Welsh democracy!
We shall see if this comes to fruition but one has to question Reform’s selection process and the credibility of such individuals, if this actually comes to pass.
The new group of defectors from ReformUK would not need to call themselves Restore Britain or AdvanceUK which is another variant. They could just call themselves Cillit Bang. Colours are purple with orange stripes. They’re all just a cabal of grifters and chancers.
…or more appropriately the mix of gunk that Cillit Bang claims to eliminate ?
Restore has a policy of abolishing the Senedd.
We’ll never stop the filth of racism sneaking into politics, unfortunately the British empire is built on it.
We can however, appeal to its supporters.
Cymru is naturally a very unracist country, they should be reminded how guests should behave.
Credit to Nation Cymru. This news is reminiscent of when four out of the seven UKIP Senedd members, who, like rats, jumped ship to the Brexit Party in 2019. Can you believe a word they say? No. I wouldn’t trust them with my spit. It doesn’t say much about lightweight Dan Thomas’s leadership so soon after the Senedd election.
In light of the hate rhetoric that reform and restore spout out that has led to 3 riots on the streets of UK, there should be no place for such political parties in Wales.
So these riots have nothing to do with targeted violence against an ethnic group
What happened to my earlier comment which was approved according to an e-mail I received? https://nation.cymru/news/restore-britain-group-likely-to-be-formed-at-the-senedd-with-reform-defectors/#comment-241593 Restore? Did they feature in that recent Senedd election? I don’t recall anything of that name cropping up among the party lists. Those A.S’s now claiming the right to transfer should be told to leave Y Senedd as they were elected on a party list and should be replaced by others who were on their party’s candidate list in the relevant constituency. I appreciate that this might drag in some even more odd characters but this vividly defines the weakness of this so called… Read more »
I might point out that Churchill crossed the floor 4 times.
‘Anyone can rat but it takes ingenuity to re-rat’
The fault is not in the candidates but rather the system. It was designed to enforce ‘party loyalty’ to stop people’s conciences having a part in politics. It was a blatant one step towards dictatorship.It is ironic that those that support the party that introduced this step would accuse those that are wreaking it of being fascist – a party that in history approved and foisted dictatorship elsewhere.
Churchill flourished politically in an era where anything went as far as party loyalties were concerned. I’m more concerned about the here and now where a system with evident flaws from the design stage was foisted upon the electorate. Now we witness one of many consequences unintended or otherwise.
The D’Hont system is used in over a dozen countries, how do they manage these changes?
You can imagine what Chief of Staff Squeegee and Chief Whip Powell will be saying to the potential defectors: If you promise to stay in Reform UK, we can get you more money to top up your salary by giving you a Senedd committee chair – sorry no we can’t, we promised that to one of Gill’s old mates. Ok, instead, we can get your relatives employed in the Reform UK group office or another MS’s office – sorry no we can’t – we promised those jobs to one of Arron Banks’ contacts, another one to one of Gill mates,… Read more »
Squeeg wanted former Conservative MS Tom Giffard to join his window round. Another reason to refuse his ‘deal’.
Under our new system they are no longer MS’s surely. They are MS’s based on their parties vote share alone and on a preference list for Refomr UK ltd. So they must go and new nominated.
Bit confused here. With this new voting system we had where we voted for a political party surely if someone defects their seat should go to the next name on that parties list. I understood first past the post but this new system seems complicated
But what if the boot was on the other foot? Surely someone that were expelled or suspended from their party Anne Jones, , McEvoy, ab Owen, Sayeed and Passmore should not be in the chamber. An excellent method of securing majorities and control. We may not like those individuals that got the boot, but do we really want that? Remember how Dafydd El was treated by Leanne.
My prediction is that Restore and Reform will fight each other to a standstill for a decreasing number of far right votes whilst the Conservatives regain strength under Badenoch and address legitimate concerns over economic and social policy in a decent centre right offering. Whether its Starmer or Burnham leading Labour up to the next election its already clear that the agenda won’t be changing – it’ll continue to be anti-wealth, anti-business, high tax, high spend, high debt, more welfare. By 2029, this agenda will be done to death and the need for change will be blindingly obvious. The question… Read more »
When BBC QT / Fiona Bruce announced a week before the BBC QT debate that the participants in the debate would be the candidates of the 5 main parties, why didn’t Rupert Lowe, Restore Britain, and Rebecca Shepherd start saying 1 week before the debate that Rebecca Shepherd should be included in it, which could have led to the BBC including her?
Why did Rupert Lowe start moaning and whinging about Shepherd not being included in the debate only 1 day before the debate?