Rwanda scheme has already cost taxpayers £700 million, Cooper reveals
The Rwanda deportation scheme has already cost £700 million despite only four volunteers being sent to Kigali, Yvette Cooper has said, branding the policy the “most shocking waste of taxpayer money I have ever seen”.
The Home Secretary accused the previous Conservative government of creating an “asylum Hotel California”, where people arrived in the system but never left.
In a statement to the Commons on Monday, Ms Cooper also warned that high levels of small boat crossings in the English Channel could persist over the summer, blaming weak border control she said Labour had “inherited”.
Gimmick
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer confirmed his administration was axing the stalled Rwanda scheme, which he and the Home Secretary have said is a “gimmick”.
“Two-and-a-half years after the previous government launched it, I can report (the Migration and Economic Development Partnership) has already cost the British taxpayer £700 million in order to send just four volunteers,” Ms Cooper said.
Those costs include £290 million paid to Rwanda, “chartering flights that never took off” and “detaining hundreds of people and then releasing them”, she said.
Ms Cooper warned that co-operation with European police forces was “too limited” and more needed to be done to tackle people-smuggling “upstream” long before the boats reached the French coast.
“I’m extremely concerned that high levels of dangerous crossings we have inherited are likely to persist through the summer,” she said.
‘Legal contradictions’
The Home Secretary raised concerns over “legal contradictions” in the Illegal Migration Act and said “no decision” could be taken on an individual’s case if they arrived in the UK after March 2023 and met key conditions in the legislation.
“It is the most extraordinary policy that I’ve ever seen. We have inherited asylum Hotel California – people arrive in the asylum system and they never leave. The previous government’s policy was effectively an amnesty and that is the wrong thing to do,” she told MPs.
Shadow home secretary James Cleverly has accused her of using “made-up numbers” and accused the UK Government of showing “discourtesy” towards the Rwandan government.
Deterrent
He said: “The Labour Party and indeed the Home Secretary in her statement likes to talk tough on border security, but today’s statement, despite all the hyperbole and the made-up numbers, is basically an admission of what we knew all along.
“That the Labour Party have scrapped the Rwanda partnership on ideological grounds, removed a deterrent, a deterrent, which the National Crime Agency said that we needed.
“And the level of discourtesy, directed towards the people and government of Rwanda is quite breathtaking.
“To have them read about this decision in the papers before anyone from Government had the good grace to formally notify them, I think, is an error, and no-one in this House believes for a moment that that level of discourtesy would have happened had this partnership been with a European country.”
It comes as Home Office figures showed nearly 1,500 migrants had arrived in the UK on small boats across the Channel in one week.
Some 1,499 people made the journey in 27 boats from July 15 to 21, while the French coastguard confirmed two people died amid rescue operations off the northern French coast.
The maritime prefecture also said on Sunday that a further 71 migrants were saved in the Channel, but that some travellers on the boat who were not requesting assistance were allowed to continue the journey.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
We certainly have a right bunch of wallies running the country. They portray themselves as people who are competent but in reality they haven’t got a clue!! £700,000,000 completely wasted and no one will be held to account.
I would think that Track and Trace @ £30+ billion and the lining of pockets of millionaires was a bigger scandal than Rwanda
700 million?
pffft.
Peanuts. (though I understand the long term prospect of this was to spiral out of control into many billions)
4 billion on the other hand….
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/home-office-not-monitoring-asylum-seekers-accommodation-providers-billion-pound-contracts-clearsprings-serco-mears/
And those British Unionists wish Wales to remain part of this false United Kingdom think these clowns are competent? The Tories spent £700 million on What? Where’s Andrew “The Mouth” RT Davies when you need him for a vacuous quote? Normally when it comes to expenditure in Wales he’d be arguing how it is a” waste of Welsh taxpayers money”, “and how it could be better spent on education, NHS and ending child poverty. Funny nothing was said when Liz Truss lost £65 billion with her fruit loop budget. Telling. It’s, do as we say not as we do. PS.… Read more »
Why if all she says is true then why is she refusing to show the books to the public & press to see this figures . Yes a lot of money has been spent and I for one think to much but why is she refusing to show us .the figures she is yelling AT EVERY ONE .Reason Labour Party have estimated it all.
You mean like the Conservative party refused unless they were dragged kicking and screaming to a committee and even then they only admit to a small cost? What, 240 million admitted so far and Rwanda refuse to give any back? I can see the costs exist especially if you look at contracts for security (and training) to force vulnerable people onto aircraft and force them to be quiet, courts readied for quickie kangaroo courts (in a country where many wait years for justice), aircraft on standby etc. That doesn’t come free and if the Tory party arranged it then we… Read more »
I thought Rwanda was a non runner but Cooper is just making up these numbers by adding costs for detained immigrants and civil service staff who whether she likes it or not where conducting govt business, they don’t add cost of DWP staff to benefits cost or other civil servants to other policies.
Undoubtedly money was wasted but it is a disservice to over inflated the costs to suit her agenda.