Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Senedd Members rebuked for calling 20mph limit a ‘blanket’ restriction

01 Oct 2026 4 minute read
Bangor Conwy Môn MS Janet Finch-Saunders, Gŵyr Abertawe MS Gwyn Williams, Caerdydd Ffynnon Taf MS Paul Rock and Brycheiniog Tawe Nedd MS David Mills

Emily Price 

Four Senedd Members from different political parties have been chastised by the Presiding Officer for referring to Wales’ 20mph default limit as a “blanket” speed restriction.

Llywydd Huw Irranca-Davies issued the reprimands to a Welsh Conservative MS, a Reform MS, a Plaid Cymru MS and a Green Party MS, during a Reform UK led debate on the controversial road policy on Wednesday (September 30).

Welsh Conservative MS for Bangor Conwy Môn Janet Finch-Saunders was the first to face a telling off from the Presiding Officer when she said her party had been the first to say no to the “20mph default, blanket”.

Irranca-Davies intervened, reminding Finch-Saunders that there was a “clear ruling” in the last Senedd that describing the default speed limit as a “blanket” policy was inaccurate.

He said: “Janet, can I just make clear to you that the standards commissioner and others have ruled on this and that ‘blanket’ is not appropriate?”

Shortly after the exchange, Gŵyr Abertawe Gwyn Williams was also forced to apologise when he too used the word “blanket”.

As soon as he uttered the word, the Plaid Cymru MS appeared to realise his mistake, throwing his hands in the air and quickly adding: “I shouldn’t say that, sorry!”

Reform MS for Brycheiniog Tawe Nedd, David Mills, was the next to make the blunder, calling for the Welsh Government to focus on dangerous driving rather than imposing a “blanket limit across the entire country”.

Before calling the next speaker, the Llywydd warned that he didn’t expect Members to repeat the word “blanket” when there had been a clear ruling in the previous Senedd on the terminology around the 20mph default speed limit.

Irranca-Davies said: “Members are being, by and large, very good in sticking to the terminology of this debate, but please don’t try my patience.”

However, immediately after the Llywydd’s warning, Green Party MS for Caerdydd Ffynnon Taf, Paul Rock, was called to the floor – and referred to the speed restriction as a “blanket” limit.

Realising his mistake, Rock covered his mouth and apologised, saying: “Sorry. I do apologise. It’s in my notes. I didn’t mean to say it. It’s really hard when I didn’t realise!”

In August, the Llywydd came under fire when he refused to confirm whether politicians could once again use the term “blanket” to describe Wales’ 20mph default speed limit.

It came after Reform’s UK’s group in the Senedd began using the term on the social media.

Nation.Cymru asked the Senedd whether use of the word when describing the 20mph default speed limit was still prohibited, and if Irranca-Davies would prevent MSs from using the term in the Chamber.

However, we were issued with a “no comment” response, leading to some MSs becoming confused about whether they could use the term again.

The Welsh Conservatives had used “blanket 20mph” as a central attack line against the previous Welsh Labour Government following the roll out of the speed limit in September 2023.

The policy saw significant public pushback including a record-breaking Senedd petition which clocked up hundreds of thousands of signatures.

However, the Tories were forced to stop using the “blanket” term due to formal rulings by the Senedd’s Standards Commissioner Douglas Bain that they were bringing Wales’ parliament into disrepute.

It was argued that because councils had the power to introduce exemptions and keep some roads at 30mph, the 20mph default speed limit was not a “blanket” policy.

In an initial investigation in January 2024, the Senedd’s watchdog cleared then-Welsh Conservative leader Andrew RT Davies of breaching the code of conduct.

Bain explained that while the word “blanket” was inaccurate, being “imprecise and inaccurate is not synonymous with being untruthful,” as it lacked deliberate deceit.

However, by September 2024, Bain took a harsher stance against Tory MS Natasha Asghar accusing her of “flying in the face of the committee’s report” because she continued to use the phrase on social media despite knowing that a formal ruling had already declared it false.

Asghar, who was the shadow transport minister at the time, was subsequently officially censured by the Senedd.

In October 2024, Bain reinvestigated Andrew RT Davies after he posted another tweet using the term “blanket”.

The Standards Commissioner concluded that Davies had breached the code of conduct and brought the parliament into disrepute.

Bain’s rulings saw the Senedd’s previous Llywydd Elin Jones issue a directive to all Senedd Members not to use the word when debating the 20mph default speed limit in the Chamber.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Matthew Paul
Matthew Paul
11 days ago

Infantile micro-management of terms Senedd members are allowed to use in debate is what brings the Senedd into disrepute, not the word ‘blanket’.

Iago
Iago
11 days ago
Reply to  Matthew Paul

You’re happy for people to deliberately misleading people with the language they use then? What a strange thing to be in favour of.

Karl
Karl
11 days ago
Reply to  Matthew Paul

You like liars then. They are the ones telling lies and also complaining about less use of English, when they are miss using words.

Richard Lice
Richard Lice
11 days ago

Today the Senedd revealed it is overflowing with mediocrity
As we watched our money being burned in a word salad
You could throw a blanket over the lot of them

Dom
Dom
11 days ago

Not very bright to be fair.

Sian
Sian
11 days ago

Tragic. Absolutely tragic. Little more than a glorified parish council. If this is the level of our political discourse and overlords then how on earth will we ever be able to even begin a march to independence? Inept at best. Stunned. Huw ID needs to go for starters.

Pete
Pete
11 days ago

Why didn’t Huw just change the ruling?

Ryan S
Ryan S
11 days ago

The senedd is becoming a circus.
It’s really difficult to take these calls for more powers seriously with such a poor 2months period and since summer ended. I can’t think of it worse period in devolved political history
Have they had any debate about the record NHS waiting list or shocking pisa results? Not that this current intake would have much of any useful insight to debate with
they collectively need to sit down and sort themselves out. The lot of them are totally pathetic.

Richard 1
Richard 1
11 days ago

Referring to 20mph as a “default limit” is no better. In the context of speed limits, “default” would mean that, in the absence of signage, there is no limit or that the UK’s general speed limit applies – 60mph or 70, depending on the type of road. Where there are signs, they indicate specific limits. It’s worrying to see our politicians and NC alike struggling with quite basic terminology.

Owain
Owain
11 days ago

So the Senedd Christmas menu will have to say a sad goodbye to ‘pigs in blankets’ , having been forced by Huw ID to replace it with the less enticing ‘pigs in default’. And they wonder why only 50% of us bother to vote…

Iago
Iago
11 days ago
Reply to  Owain

I’m sure this sounded very funny and clever in your head.

Nigel
Nigel
11 days ago
Reply to  Iago

But kind of embarrassing in text…

Nigel
Nigel
11 days ago

I see the anti Welsh brigade are on this like a free wetherspoons meal.

Dom
Dom
10 days ago

They’d soon learn the difference if their salary was treated as a blanket not a default and they lost the committee chair and group leader top-ups.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.