Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Social tenants should keep gardens tidy or face eviction, Reform chairman says

24 Aug 2026 5 minute read
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice (left) and Lee Anderson MP during a press conference at the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors in Westminster. Photo Aaron Chown/PA Wire

Harry Taylor, Press Association Political Staff

Social housing tenants should be made to keep their gardens well maintained or face eviction, the chairman of Reform UK said, as the party said it would prioritise British-born workers under-35 for council homes.

Lee Anderson indicated to a press conference in London that people living on social housing could have to keep their homes “decorated” and gardens looked after, or face being kicked out.

He was speaking as the party made its latest announcement that priority would be given to veterans and married couples with children, if it wins the next general election.

The party has already said it would evict foreign nationals from social housing.

Reform UK’s deputy leader Richard Tice set out a plan for the party to build 50,000 affordable social homes a year, which he says will require no new taxes or borrowing.

However Mr Anderson said social housing tenants should maintain a minimum level of upkeep on their homes, as he recalled standards required after the Second World War.

He said: “If you go back in time and look what actually happened… the people that rented council homes had to be married under a Labour, socialist government.

“They had to look after their property. They had to keep it well maintained. The gardens done and decorated, and they were inspected on a regular basis by officers from the council.”

He said tenants would previously be given chances and a “ticking off”, but added: “If after that you didn’t keep it up to reasonable standard, you were out, and they gave it to another couple who would look after their property.”

As he was further pressed on the issue, he said: “What is wrong with expecting people who live in subsidised housing, paid for, subsidised, by the hard-working British taxpayer … to keep their house to a reasonable standard?”

He added: “We see all sorts of people moving into these brand new houses and creating mayhem and disturbances on these brand new housing estates.

“And the hardworking British taxpayer, the alarm clock people who get up at 5am or 6am, go to work and see the house next door with 4ft of weeds, dustbin not been emptied for three weeks and a waft of weed coming out the window, is not acceptable.”

Announcing their social housing policy at the event on Monday morning, Mr Tice said it was “not fair” that British people are “unable to get on the housing ladder” ahead of foreign nationals.

“We’ve got 1.3 million people in the queue, and we’re saying that the first people that one should be looking after are young British workers, under 35, young British married couples, young British veterans who’ve done the right thing,” Mr Tice said.

“They’ve got a job, doing their best, working in their community, setting a fine example. Because the role of the British government is actually to look after British citizens first, and we think that is the most important.”

UK or Irish nationals made up 88.5% of main householders – the person in whose name the social home is rented – in 2024/25, while 11.5% were non-UK/Irish nationals, according to the English Housing Survey.

There are an estimated 470,000 non-UK and non-Irish citizens living in social housing.

Reform UK estimates that 540,000 social homes are currently occupied by foreign nationals.

‘Stoke division’

Housing charity Shelter said before the announcement that strict rules on social housing allocation would cause more homelessness, and the charity’s chief executive Sarah Elliot said Reform’s policies were designed to “stoke division”.

The Conservatives have said they would revoke the right of foreign nationals to social housing, and claim it would free up around 230,000 homes.

Mr Tice, who is getting married again later this year, also said the stipulation for married couples was the party being “ambitious” about promoting marriage. He was asked why 70% of those under-35 who do not get married should “subsidise” those who do. He said civil partnerships would qualify.

He said: “Marriage is a great thing. In a sense, when people get married, we all hope that it’s going to be for life. Sometimes it is, and sometimes it doesn’t work out. But I don’t think it’s wrong to be to be ambitious and to promote marriage, and that’s you know that that that’s the right thing to do in our judgement.”

‘Desperate’

A Labour Party spokesperson said: “Reform is so desperate to try and deflect attention away from the scandals Nigel Farage is drowning in, they have cobbled together unworkable and unserious plans which they can’t answer even basis questions on.

“It would blow a £10 billion blackhole in the public finances, would create years of wrangling with the EU, and could leave British citizens without a place to call home.

“This Labour government is investing billions to deliver the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, to fix the housing crisis we inherited from the Tories.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Richard Lice
Richard Lice
2 days ago

I guess the RICS HQ was handily placed just around the corner from the H of C as a venue
They have been consulted and instrumental in nuch of housing policy over the decades
Extremely disappointed that its now perceived to be supporting this dog whistling by Lee Anderson

Jeff
Jeff
2 days ago

Lee Anderson, IQ lower than his nickname. Race hate runs through this party.

ARTD still best mates with him?

Last edited 2 days ago by Jeff
Guess Again
Guess Again
2 days ago

Wow the pseudo-libertarian to insecure authoritarian control freak pipeline is a powerful force

Bob
Bob
2 days ago

30p Lee: the idiot’s idiot.

Brychan
Brychan
1 day ago

Should they win a Westminster election such policies would relate to England only. Housing is devolved. ReformUK failed to get elected to government in Wales and Scotland in May of this year.

https://www.reformparty.uk/view-pdf/affordable-social-housing

The link is to a rather garbled policy document.

Guess Again
Guess Again
1 day ago
Reply to  Brychan

Since the May local elections in England, at least 56 Reform UK councillors have left by defection, suspension or resignation. Next year is our turn at the ballot box. I sure hope we will learn from this am-dram farce and reject them altogether in May 2027.

https://lowdown.today/t/uk-elections-2026/16/reform-sheds-56-councillors-since-may/?utm_source=copilot.com

Last edited 1 day ago by Guess Again
Y Cymro
Y Cymro
1 day ago

I bet 30p Lee Anderson’s socialist father is rolling in his grave at his vulgar son.

Dom
Dom
1 day ago

“prioritise workers under-35”

Astonishing but not surprising if they’re saying pensioners who find themselves homeless through no fault of their own will be thrown to the wolves.

Adam
Adam
1 day ago

I think they need to have a look at Welsh housing law. Veterans have had list priority since 2014, and most housing associations in Cymru have a local connection clause when providing accommodation.
If he doesn’t realise that the Welsh government is already ahead on this (by over a decade) them he really shouldn’t be anywhere near his position.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.