Starmer denies watering down green power target in new ‘plan for change’
Sir Keir Starmer was forced to deny watering down a green energy pledge after setting a target for the UK to be “on track” to deliver 95% clean power by 2030.
The Labour election manifesto this year and Sir Keir’s “missions” set out almost two years ago both promised “zero-carbon electricity” by 2023.
But the “milestone” in Sir Keir’s new “plan for change” promises a measure in line with advice from the National Energy System Operator (Neso) aiming for 95% reliance on “low carbon generation”.
Shift
The Prime Minister, announcing his plan at Pinewood Studios, denied there was a shift in position.
Sir Keir said: “The clean energy pledge is today exactly what it was in the election; that has always been central to our mission.”
He added: “The mission hasn’t changed from the day I launched it nearly two years ago.
“In terms of where we need to get to on clean energy by 2030, it’s exactly the same as it always was.
“There’s always going to be a mix but that is the pledge that we made two years ago. That is the mission and we’ve not changed it today.”
Ministers insisted the promise to achieve at least 95% clean power by 2030 was consistent with Labour’s pre-election “mission” as the UK would still maintain a “strategic gas reserve”.
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband also insisted there had been no change, saying “that is what the Climate Change Committee said in their original definition of what a clean power system was”.
Clean power mission
He added: “We made the choice originally when we launched the clean power mission that there would always be a strategic backup reserve of gas, and that always meant that there would be a very low percentage, but a percentage nonetheless, of gas and that’s been defined for us by the Neso.”
In his speech, Sir Keir also promised to stop red tape – including measures aimed at protecting nature – getting in the way of major infrastructure projects.
HS2 Ltd is spending more than £100 million building a structure to protect bats despite the rail project firm’s chairman saying there is no evidence that high-speed trains interfere with the creatures.
The Prime Minister said planning rules had resulted in “the absurd spectacle of a £100 million bat tunnel holding up the country’s single biggest infrastructure project”.
He added: “This Government will not accept this nonsense any more.”
Commitment
Environmental campaign group Greenpeace welcomed Sir Keir’s commitment to clean energy.
Ami McCarthy, Greenpeace UK’s head of politics, said: “The devastation caused by recent deadly floods is a stark reminder of the necessity of switching to clean power as fast as humanly possible.
“Luckily, Keir Starmer is like a dog with a bone when it comes to his commitment to wind and solar – exactly the kind of action this country needs.”
Dhara Vyas, chief executive of industry body Energy UK, said: “It was good to hear the Prime Minister reiterate the Government’s clean energy ambitions.
“The energy industry welcomes a commitment to building for the future because of the economic benefits this could bring to all parts of the country through investment, growth and job creation along with increasing our energy security.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
He is watering it down; he has to, because Net Zero is an idiotic pipe dream that does not survive contact with reality.
Agree. Net Zero is firstly impossible to achieve and secondly it will have no impact on global warming. UK is responsible for only 1% of global warming so bankrupting us all to go for Net Zero will achieve NOTHING. We need to be putting our scarce resouces into dealing with the consequneces of global warming in the UK, not trying to stop it happening as it will happen.
“…only 1%…” is still more than the Uk’s 0.85% share of the world’s population.
Have you factored In consumption emissions, from offshored production?
What about historical emissions; don’t you think we should clean up the mess we’ve already made?
Most of what you wrote is counterfactual, by the way.
Are your views sponsored by the oil and gas industry?
Smoke and mirrors from Starmer again it is a reduction of original target, NESO never existed when original 100% target was uttered and printed.