Starmer urged to reveal if he made comparison between benefits and pocket money

Sir Keir Starmer must reveal whether he first made the comparison between benefits and pocket money which saw one of his ministers harshly criticised, the Liberal Democrats have said.
Treasury minister Darren Jones faced backlash when he made the comparison in the wake of the Chancellor’s spring statement, which included further cuts to welfare.
Mr Jones had sought to explain that extra funding to learn new skills and get into work would make people better off than if they relied alone on benefits payments.
But Rachel Reeves later said he had made a “clumsy” analogy when he compared the uplift for skills to his children working a weekend job on top of receiving pocket money.
Mr Jones has apologised for the remarks.
Cabinet meeting
The Times newspaper reported that Sir Keir was the first to have made the comparison during a meeting of the Cabinet before the spring statement.
Liberal Democrat work and pensions spokesman Steve Darling said the Prime Minister “needs to urgently confirm whether he suggested this insulting analogy and if so immediately apologise to the millions whose lives his welfare reforms will have made even more challenging”.
Torbay MP Mr Darling, who is registered blind, added: “Everything about these reforms paints the picture of a Government at real risk of losing its moral compass.
“We all accept that the welfare bill needs to be managed down but these cruel cuts are not the right approach. They take support away from many who can’t work or care for those who can’t, all whilst saying the goal of them is to get people into work. It is nonsensical.
“If the Government was serious about bringing the welfare bill down it would start by fixing the crisis in social care.”
Family experience
Asked about the Lib Dems’ comments, Downing Street pointed towards Sir Keir’s own family experience.
Speaking to broadcasters this week following the spring statement, the Prime Minister said: “I’ve lived all my life with the impact of disability, through my mum, who was very ill all of her life, and more recently, my brother, who recently died of cancer.
“So I do understand the concerns, but I do think it’s morally indefensible that a million young people are going essentially from education onto benefits.
“They’re not in work, they’re not in education, they’re not in training. All of the evidence shows that if young people are in that position, and so early in their lives, they’re going to find it really difficult ever to get out of that. I don’t think that is morally defensible.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Is this the generation in Black he is talking about, of course the last 15 years of Tory Brexit, Covid and Tory VIP Plunder otherwise included in the Fat Shanks Effect…won him an election, since then he has poisoned nearly every well…
The Bumbles of Downing Street…
That Blind, Deaf and Dumb Boy, Clark, sure plays a lowdown and dirty game…
There was a time when the Labour Party prided itself on being the staunch defender of the working class, a voice for the downtrodden, the vulnerable, and those struggling to make ends meet. Now, under the stewardship of a government that has supposedly come to power to champion progressive change, it’s hard to see much of that spirit of solidarity. Labour’s latest policy proposals on disability benefits are a stark betrayal of its base, pushing many disabled people, those living with long-term sickness, and low-income families to the very brink of poverty – all under the questionable auspices of fiscal… Read more »