Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Starmer warned to boost defence spending or be consigned to ‘bin of history’

15 Feb 2025 3 minute read
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Photo John Macdougall/PA Wire

Sir Keir Starmer has been warned by a former head of the army that he faces being consigned to the dustbin of history unless the UK Government significantly hikes defence spending.

Ex-chief of the general staff Lord Dannatt said spending should rise to a 3.5% share of the economy.

The UK currently spends around 2.3% of gross domestic product on defence, a figure the Government wants to increase to 2.5%.

Failure

The Government has promised its strategic defence review will set out the “pathway” to reach that 2.5% goal, but Lord Dannatt said the process would be a “failure” unless spending went even higher.

“Unless Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves can find ways of producing more money, well beyond 2.5% towards 3% or 3.5% for starters on our defence budget, then this strategic defence review is going to be hollow, it’s going to be a failure and, frankly, it’ll consign Keir Starmer to the bin of history,” he said.

The UK and its allies are under pressure from Donald Trump’s United States to do more to shoulder the burden of European defence.

Lord Dannatt, head of the army from 2006 to 2009, told BBC Radio 4’s Week in Westminster the UK military is “so run down” it could not lead a future peacekeeping mission in Ukraine.

He said around 40,000 UK troops could be needed for such a mission and “we just haven’t got that number available”.

“Our military is so run down at the present moment, numerically and as far as capability and equipment is concerned, it would potentially be quite embarrassing,” he said.

“If we were to deploy 10,000 troops, each rotation for six months, that would effectively tie up 30,000 or 40,000 troops – and we just haven’t got that number available.

“So there are some big issues here that today’s politicians won’t really have considered.”

Cold war

Former Nato deputy supreme allied commander General Sir Richard Shirreff suggested defence spending would have to rise to Cold War levels of around 4%.

The retired officer told BBC Radio 4’s Today it was a “defining moment” because Europe “cannot trust or rely on the United States” as it had “effectively given up leadership of the free world” due to Mr Trump’s approach to the Ukraine crisis.

Setting out what was required, he said: “We’re talking about moving back to levels of defence spending not seen since the Cold War.”

He said it would require “real sacrifice”, but “unless it’s made we are not going to be able to enjoy peace” because Russia would continue to represent a threat.

He said: “The only way we are going to enjoy peace is through effective deterrence, a Nato band of deterrence from the Baltic to the Black Sea, and that will need to be paid for.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
14 days ago

He/MoD has had the ear of Dave, May and Fat Shanks for how long?

He is sat on the rim of that bin…

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
14 days ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

What a stupid thing to say…fame becomes infamy…

Adrian
Adrian
14 days ago

Too late: Starmer’s already an irrelevance.

John
John
14 days ago

As an ex serviceman, I can’t stress how much money would be needed for the UK to do much without the US. So many of our systems are deeply interlinked and have so co-dependencies. We wouldn’t have been able to do the sort thing we did in Afghanistan if the US weren’t there. It wasn’t necessarily a mistake, as it allowed our forces to be more effective, but times are changing.
But military spending is furiously expensive. Dannett is talking an extra 20 billion a year here, every year for at least the next 10

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
14 days ago
Reply to  John

Pity his Tory bosses spaffed it on their mates…

MoD: Ministry of Disasters…

Build them and then cut them up merchants…TSR2, Nimrod etc…

John
John
14 days ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

The Nimrod was close to a billion over budget for about 6 planes. It was based on a plane designed in late 1940s. And would have cost a fortune to keep in service.
The thing is you can always find waste in military procurement. The only thing to do is make the decision sensible at the time it’s made

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
14 days ago
Reply to  John

Who makes that decision, ouch! laughing to hard…

A direct line between a fighter that had no forward firing guns and the MoD today. We struggled and failed to build up a Task Force that included the supporting Fleet Train recently, the days of Grapple are gone…

Our Navy can be summed up by the fate of HMS Bronington…

It saddens me deeply to say that…

Charles Coombes
Charles Coombes
13 days ago

But what colour bin? Discuss.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.