Reeves to promise ‘fairness’ in Budget as income tax hike speculation mounts

Rachel Reeves will promise a Budget of “fairness and opportunity” amid mounting speculation that she is preparing to hike income tax to plug a hole in the public finances.

In a speech from Downing Street on Tuesday, the Chancellor is expected to say she will “make the choices necessary to deliver strong foundations for our economy” for “years to come”.

Ahead of her remarks, No 10 repeatedly refused to re-commit to Labour’s manifesto pledges – fuelling speculation that its promise to avoid hiking income tax looks set to be broken.

Ms Reeves is expected to lay out three key priorities of cutting national debt, easing the cost of living and protecting the NHS, adding: “It will be a budget led by this Government’s values, of fairness and opportunity and focused squarely on the priorities of the British people.

“You will all have heard a lot of speculation about the choices I will make. I understand that these are important choices that will shape our economy for years to come.

“But it is important that people understand the circumstances we are facing, the principles guiding my choices – and why I believe they will be the right choices for the country.”

The speech is a bid to roll the pitch for a difficult autumn statement on November 26, in which the Chancellor is widely expected to raise taxes to balance the books in the face of weak growth and higher borrowing costs.

Economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies have already predicted that she would need to find £22 billion to restore the £10 billion of headroom she previously left herself against her self-imposed debt targets.

A bigger-than-expected downgrade to productivity could see that figure increase even further, although better-than-expected inflation figures and a slight improvement in some growth forecasts may ease the pressure slightly.

It comes as Ms Reeves is rumoured to be considering a proposal by the Resolution Foundation, a think tank with close links to the Treasury, to raise income tax by 2p on the pound while cutting national insurance by the same amount.

‘Switch’ plan

The foundation framed the measure as a “switch” plan that would help to iron out “unfairness” in the system by spreading the tax burden across a wider group, including pensioners and landlords.

The move would be an unambiguous breach of Labour’s election manifesto commitment not to hike income tax, VAT or national insurance on “working people”, which the Government has in recent days declined to say still stands.

Asked on Tuesday whether the Budget would leave that pledge intact, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said the Chancellor would “strike the right balance” between funding public services and encouraging growth.

But No 10 also warned of “tough but fair” decisions on taxes while insisting action would be taken to keep them “as low as possible”.

“I think what we’ve said is that the choices we’ll take at the Budget will be led by our values and our determination to build a fairer economy that works for working people and rewards working people,” the spokesman said.

“We will maintain a tight grip on public spending to keep taxes, inflation and interest rates as low as possible.

“We will take the tough but fair choices on tax so everyone, including businesses and the wealthiest, contributes their share to fund our public services.”

Rebellion

Meanwhile, the Chancellor’s task of balancing the books has become more challenging after a backbench rebellion earlier this year resulted in the Government rowing back on planned welfare cuts of up to £5 billion.

Kemi Badenoch is expected to heighten her attacks over the U-turn in a speech on Tuesday, claiming “Britain has stopped working” and accusing Labour of having “given up” on lowering the benefits bill.

The Tory leader will also call on the Chancellor personally to “demand the Government withdraws the Employment Rights Bill altogether – before it becomes Labour’s Unemployment Act.”

“Britain has stopped working, because it has stopped making sense to work,” Mrs Badenoch is expected to say.

“Far from solving this, Labour seem intent on making it worse.”

She will claim the Government’s workers’ rights bill is “not fit for purpose,” adding: “It needs a fundamental rethink and overhaul. The only responsible action left for the Government is to shelve it in its entirety and start from scratch.

“So ahead of the budget later this month, Rachel Reeves should demand the Government withdraws the Employment Rights Bill altogether – before it becomes Labour’s Unemployment Act.”