Tice declines to say if Farage’s undeclared £5m gift was only used for security

Reform UK’s deputy leader has said a £5 million gift given to Nigel Farage by a party mega donor was “based around safety and security”, but appeared to be unable to guarantee none of it was spent on campaigning.
Reform leader Mr Farage was referred to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner by the Conservatives last week after it emerged he had received the previously undeclared gift from Thailand-based cryptocurrency investor Christopher Harborne in 2024.
His deputy Richard Tice on Sunday said the sum was “probably not enough” to keep Mr Farage safe.
Mr Tice evaded repeated questions on whether all of it was spent on security, insisting Mr Farage “complied with the rules” and saying he was “grateful” the “wonderful” Mr Harborne was supporting the Reform leader’s security.
After Reform’s success in last week’s local elections, Mr Tice also suggested voters did not care about the £5 million gift and accused the media of “trying to smear” the party.
Political opponents have criticised Mr Farage for failing to declare the money, which he reportedly received in 2024 before he announced he would stand in Clacton-on-Sea at that year’s general election, to parliamentary authorities.
Parliamentary rules require new MPs to register any financial support they have received in the 12 months before their election, unless it “could not reasonably be thought by others” to be connected to their political activities.
Mr Tice, the Reform UK MP for Boston and Skegness, told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: “The reality is, voters have been made aware of all of this and have said: ‘We want more Nigel, we want more Reform leadership, we want more Reform councillors.’
“The rules are very clear and Nigel has complied with the rules.”
Pressed on whether any of the cash was spent on other political activity, Mr Tice said: “Nigel’s safety and security is absolutely paramount. And I know, because I spend a lot of time with Nigel, that frankly £5 million is probably not enough.”
He added it was “a personal gift based around safety and security”.
Mr Tice, who has himself faced questions about his finances, including whether he failed to pay almost £100,000 in corporation tax, claimed voters are “sick” of attempts by the press to “smear” Reform.
Mr Harborne has separately donated millions to Reform, including a £9 million donation in August 2025 – the biggest single donation in history to a political party from a living person.
Labour Party chairwoman Anna Turley said: “Once again, Farage and his MPs clearly believe there’s one rule for them and another for everyone else.
“Serious questions remain unanswered after Nigel Farage appeared to once again breach the rules by failing to declare money from his billionaire backer.
“He didn’t just take the cash and fail to declare it – he announced a crypto tax cut policy that would directly benefit his secret donor.
“Reform have consistently attempted to dodge scrutiny. Deputy leader Richard Tice still refuses to answer over his own tax scandal. Reform are simply riding roughshod over public trust in politics.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Toys out of pram Tice spitting out ‘smear’ and demanding no scrutiny of his dodgy operation. All he had to say was the same as his leader said which was the money was all to be used for his own personal security. It must be true surely. His trustworthy leader said so but no, he couldn’t do that. Why? Looking after his interests in preparation for being returned to his position as the pre then post Nige leader perhaps? I do hope so. When the head has been removed, Deform will fall back to UKIP status.
This stinks to high heaven. When will those who voted Reform UK wake up and realise they’ve been conned?
Farage ever the political coward sends out the help.
How mont other payments do we now about.
It doesn’t matter if it was all for security because that security was only needed *if* he returned to frontline politics. Therefore it enabled him to return to politics. By saying it’s for security it’s acknowledging it as a political donation.
All those milkshakes, all that dry-cleaning.
Because a suspected tax evader’s word can be trusted. Right?