Tommy Robinson loses appeal against sentence for contempt of court

Tommy Robinson has lost an appeal against his 18-month sentence for the civil offence of contempt of court at the Court of Appeal.
Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was jailed in October last year after admitting multiple breaches of a High Court order made in 2021, which barred him from repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel.
The 42-year-old appealed against his sentence on Friday, with the Court of Appeal told that his mental health, combined with his segregation in prison, is “making him ill” and is having a “demonstrable effect” on him.
The Solicitor General opposed the appeal, with its barristers stating there are “no grounds for altering the sentence”.
In a ruling on Wednesday, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Edis and Lord Justice Warby dismissed the appeal.
Meticulous
They said: “The judge’s application of the law and his reasoning on the appropriate sanction in this case both exhibit a meticulous approach.”
The decision marks Robinson’s second court defeat in less than a month, after a bid to bring a legal challenge against the Government over his segregation at HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes was thrown out of the High Court in March.
He was jailed at Woolwich Crown Court after admitting 10 breaches of the injunction, the Solicitor General having earlier issued two contempt claims against him last year.
The first alleged he “knowingly” breached the order on four occasions, including by having “published, caused, authorised or procured” a film called Silenced, which contains the libellous allegations, in May 2023.
The film was pinned to the top of Robinson’s profile on the social media site X, while he also repeated the claims in three interviews between February and June 2023.
The second claim was issued in August concerning six further breaches, including playing the film at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square in central London last summer.
Breaches
Handing down the sentence in October, Mr Justice Johnson said “nobody is above the law”, and he described Robinson’s breaches of the injunction as “flagrant”.
The judge said Robinson could reduce his sentence by four months if he took certain steps to “purge” his contempt, such as removing the film from his social media pages.
At the Court of Appeal, Alisdair Williamson KC, for Robinson, said he has ADHD and “complex post-traumatic stress disorder”, which the sentencing judge was not fully aware of.
He said: “(Mr Justice Johnson) did not have before him this additional factor, which in of itself means that the conditions that Mr Yaxley-Lennon faces are more onerous.”
He continued: “He is being kept safe by the authorities in segregation, but being kept safe is making him ill, and more ill than Mr Justice Johnson could have foreseen on the basis of the information before him.”
Aidan Eardley KC, for the Solicitor General, said in written submissions there is “no evidence that the conditions in which the appellant is being held are more severe than was anticipated” by Mr Justice Johnson.
He said: “Legally, there is no basis for arguing that conditions unforeseeably imposed by the prison authorities could found a ground of appeal.”
He continued: “There are no grounds for altering the sentence in this case.”
Sued
The injunction was issued after Robinson was successfully sued by Jamal Hijazi, a then-schoolboy who was assaulted at Almondbury Community School in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, in October 2018.
After a clip of the incident went viral, Robinson made false claims on Facebook, including about Mr Hijazi attacking girls in his school, leading to the libel case.
Mr Justice Nicklin ordered Robinson to pay Mr Hijazi £100,000 in damages and his legal costs, as well as making the injunction preventing Robinson from repeating the allegations.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Shame the “demonstrable effect” is unlikely to include learing a little humility or developing a scrap of compasion or humanity.
Seeing the likes of him having a completely deserved hard time restores my faith in the justice system. Let’s hope they send some of his followers to keep him company.
Oh, I only wish it was true. I tell myself he’s suffering (mostly from the lack of attention because he’s a total narcissist) but the truth is that this was probably just a strategy on the part of his solicitor to get him either: A: back out of prison or B: back into a general population wing where he can stir up hate and go back to being the hero in his own story. The best I think we can get is that he is furious and frustrated because he can’t play at being the “hero of the right” that… Read more »
Oh dear, what a shame.
The judges gave him every opportunity to reduce his sentence just by deleting the libellous rubbish from his social media……he chose not to. Now he gets to enjoy the consequences of that choice.
I’m sure that all those who have suffered because of his foul rhetoric are feeling so sorry for him right now 🙂