Tories challenge Chancellor on Burnham’s ‘unfunded spending commitments’
George Lithgow and Will Meakin-Durrant, Press Association Political Staff
The Conservatives have called on the Chancellor to set out how he will pay for Andy Burnham’s “unfunded spending commitments”.
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the Prime Minister’s pledges will add to concerns about tax rises at the next budget.
In a letter to John Healey, Sir Mel said the country “cannot afford to tax or spend or borrow our way into avoiding difficult decisions”.
The Prime Minister and Mr Healey are already under pressure to say how they will sustain a raft of support packages they announced for bus passengers, energy billpayers and pub punters.
Mr Burnham has been accused by the Tories of going on a spending spree, and the Resolution Foundation think tank estimated that this week’s pledges have squeezed the fiscal headroom to as little as £8 billion.
The Prime Minister said he would knock VAT off electricity bills in England, Scotland and Wales from October 1.
The Government has estimated the move will cost around £850 million in 2026-27.
It would be paid for by cancelling the digital ID programme, which was expected to cost £1.8 billion over three years.
The Prime Minister also went to Bath, Somerset, to celebrate his plan to bring the £3 bus fare cap down to £2 throughout 2027.
This will be funded by turning international climate grants into loans, raising around £400 million, and raising a further £54 million from savings in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero budget.
Mr Burnham spent Thursday morning at The Hare pub in Harlow, Essex, where he announced that business rates for pubs, clubs and live music venues would be cut by 20% from April next year.
The move will cost the Treasury around £100 million.
Sir Mel said: “Andy Burnham came into office without a plan.
“He has made numerous promises but seems to have little idea how he will pay for any of them.
“These unfunded pledges will only add to concern and speculation about yet more Labour tax rises at the next budget, as well as yet more borrowing, leaving a crippling burden for future generations.
“Britain cannot afford that – and businesses and households should not be left in the dark.
“That’s why I’m calling on John Healey to come clean on the real cost of Burnham – and tell us who he expects to pay for it.”
A Labour Party spokesperson said: “The Tories crashed the economy and left families worse off.
“They’ve never apologised and are still making uncosted promises today.
“They may have forgotten what they did, but nobody else has.
“Andy Burnham’s fully funded pledges will start to give people some of the breathing space they deserve.
“We’re cutting tax on electricity bills, capping bus fares at £2, and slashing business rates for pubs, social clubs and live music venues – immediate action to help families and high streets.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Get more trusted Welsh news
Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.
Conservatives? Call for “unfunded” decisions to be explained? Lets see, Kemi wants to drop net zero, that will impact the UK massively and there are rules to trading with the EU that mean we will get increased tariffs for breaking that commitment. Kemi wants to drill baby drill and there are no benefits to the ordinary UK person, it will be on the open market, the direction needs to be greening up and more jobs available that route. See net zero. She wants out of the ECHR, that will have trading issues and will remove our rights, that will be… Read more »
They could have released it under the headline “Don’t follow the Liz Truss example”.
Not that what-aboutery makes new unfunded commitments a great idea but…
The Cons won’t be taken seriously on the economy for at least as long as they wrongly managed to hold Labour responsible for the consequences of the oil crises in the 70s.
Have they given up on that one yet? I missed it if they have, which is perfectly possible, though I did catch Osborne finally admitting it wasn’t true that Gordon Brown caused a global recession by benefits spending in 2008
Opposition entitled to question Burnham decisions but these small concessions go down well with public who have endured 2 years of the previous regime’s dirge and 10+ years of Tory led misery. At least Burnham understood that he and the UK in general needed something mildly cheerful. He should be able to fund it and a chunk of Defence “deficit” by rounding up some more of the tax unpaid by the raft of dodgers out in the more opaque areas of the economy.
I believe Truss and Kwarteng are still members of the Conservative party. If this is the case, even if in one case only, how dare they even pipe up about ‘unfunded’ spending commitments? If either are still members, they MUST be expelled immediately to enable further comment Ms Badenoch.