Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intelligence assessment stirs debate

President Donald Trump has insisted that US strikes delivered a crushing blow to Iran’s nuclear programme despite a preliminary American intelligence assessment suggesting that the assault inflicted only a marginal setback.
“This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,” Mr Trump said as his administration deployed a phalanx of top officials to defend his claims that Iran’s nuclear programme was “completely and fully obliterated”.
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the leaked intelligence assessment, which said Iran suffered a delay of only a few months, was “preliminary” and “low confidence”.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the officials who disclosed the findings are “professional stabbers”.
The White House pointed to a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission that said Iran faced a setback of “many years”.
Competing claims
Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult, making the issue a breeding ground for competing claims that could determine how American voters view Mr Trump’s risky decision to join Israel’s attacks on Iran.
Also at stake are Mr Trump’s next steps in the Middle East, where diplomatic efforts could be required to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear program.
Iran maintains that its atomic ambitions are for peaceful purposes, while US and Israeli leaders have described the country’s nuclear programme as the precursor to obtaining a nuclear weapon.
One of the targets of the US attack was Fordo, where nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground.
‘Inoperable’
The Israeli commission said in a statement that the bombing “rendered the enrichment facility inoperable”.
The statement was distributed by the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The American strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other parts of Iran’s military nuclear programme, have “set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years”, the statement said.
In addition, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera that there was significant damage from US bombers.
“Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that’s for sure,” he said.
The episode has triggered some of Mr Trump’s longstanding vendettas against leaks and intelligence officials, who he has often viewed as a part of a “deep state” dedicated to undermining his agenda.
He also lashed out at media outlets that reported on the classified assessment, describing them as “scum” and “disgusting”.
Disrespectful
Mr Trump said questioning the effectiveness of the strikes was disrespectful to the military, which flew stealth bombers halfway around the world to attack the nuclear facilities with weapons designed to penetrate deep underground.
The reports, he said, were “very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives for our country”.
One critical question is whether enriched uranium, which could be developed into fuel for a nuclear bomb, was moved out of facilities before the US strikes.
“I believe they didn’t have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,” Mr Trump said.
He added that “it’s very hard to move that kind of material, and very dangerous”.
Classified briefings for legislators, originally scheduled for Tuesday, are now expected to take place on Thursday and Friday.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


If it was so dangerous to move the nuclear material around, how on heart is bombing it going to make it any safer?
I do not understand why Iran would claim that their nuclear facility was not hit. Saying things like that will only encourage Trump to drop more bombs. Also, wouldn’t bombing a nuclear facility run the risk of setting off a nuclear bomb?
Why am I going to take the word of a fox news anchor with issues and a convicted felon and abuser?
Evidence not what trump claims should rule here and I watch the NATO press stuff in horror as they all appeased the felon. Maybe that is the only way.
Trump likes to set the “facts”, often, he has been shown on a different planet to the facts.
The trouble with constantly lying is that nobody believes what comes out of your mouth. Add to that having a defence secretary that can’t treat confidentiality with any respect and sends information to the wrong people creates a feeling of incompetence. I would rather believe someone whose real job is assessing the realistic effects of the military strike. If Israel and US really believe they’ve destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities then pull back and leave Iran to recover and go back to shamefully killing the hungry defenceless people of Gaza while the rest of the world look on and wonder what… Read more »