UK ‘agreed to drop’ Apple data demand in privacy row, US chief says

The UK Government has dropped its demand for Apple to access users’ data amid a privacy and encryption row, according to the US director of national intelligence.
Tulsi Gabbard posted on X that the UK has agreed to end the request for the US tech giant after working alongside American president Donald Trump, vice president JD Vance and British counterparts “over the past few months”.
She posted: “As a result, the UK agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a ‘back door’ that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.”
Investigatory Powers Act
Earlier this year, it was reported the Government had issued a notice under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, asking Apple for the ability to access data from Apple users.
This was said to include encrypted data protected by the tech giant’s advanced data protection (ADP) tool, an opt-in tool within Apple’s iCloud service which only an account holder can access, and is currently out of the reach of even Apple.
The iPhone-maker subsequently said it was withdrawing the tool from the UK and brought legal action against the Home Office.
Backdoor
Reacting to Ms Gabbard’s statement, Conservative MP David Davis said: “The Government’s decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple’s encryption are to be welcomed.
“Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious actors.”
The Government’s approach was widely criticised by online privacy campaigners and experts when reports of the request first appeared.
However, some online safety charities, as well as police and security services around the world, have long warned of the dangers of end-to-end encrypted services, arguing that they allow offenders such as terrorists and child abusers to hide more easily.
On Tuesday, a UK Government spokesperson said: “We do not comment on operational matters, including confirming or denying the existence of such notices.
“We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats.”
They added the agreements have “long contained” safeguards to protect privacy and sovereignty, including for UK and US citizens.
Apple has been contacted for comment.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Pathetic capitulation by starmer’s govt – just like under tony b-liar a british govt is the white house’s poodle once more. This decision means it will be easier for sick individuals who trade in disgusting images of children to evade detection and arrest – and sorry but catching child abusers trumps a ‘right to privacy’ every time (or at least it should do). The already inadequate online safety act will be next go due to white house disapproval
Sick individuals will always find a way to hide what they are doing. There are dozens of encrypted messaging services and they would simply move to one of those. Hence the proposal would not have achieved its objective, but would have left a back door open into law-abiding citizens’ phones which could eventually be exploited by a different type of unpleasant individual. This is a victory for common sense and a victory for anybody who prefers to live in a free society rather than a surveillance state.