Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

UK’s military ‘hollowed out by underfunding’ say former defence chiefs

19 Feb 2026 4 minute read
“British Army Soldier Firing SA80 on a Practice Range” by Defence Images is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.

Former defence leaders have warned that the armed forces have been “hollowed out by years of chronic underfunding”.

An open letter to the Prime Minister, signed by three former defence secretaries, retired senior military chiefs and ex-MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove, said Britain is facing a “1936 moment” amid rising global tensions and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The Prime Minister has committed to increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP next year and to 3% after the next election.

The letter, published in The Daily Telegraph, calls on him to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP.

“Our actions fall dangerously short of matching this rhetoric and of meeting our treaty obligations,” the letter read.

“We are deluding ourselves if we believe Russia and our other adversaries are unaware of this.”

The Government has yet to publish its delayed defence investment plan (Dip) setting out how it will meet its commitments.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman insisted on Monday that the Ministry of Defence was working “flat out” to deliver the plan “as soon as possible”.

“Commit now to a bold, credible and measurable path to spending 5% of GDP on core defence, providing the certainty our Armed Forces, industry, and our long-standing allies need to deter aggression and secure Britain’s future,” the letter urged Sir Keir.

“You must recognise that we are facing our 1936 moment: global conflict is highly likely if we don’t invest in deterrence now.”

In January, Downing Street refused to deny reports that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) faces a shortfall of up to £28 billion amid suggestions that a budget black hole had prompted Sir Keir Starmer to order an overhaul of the investment plan.

“Recent reports highlight that your Government appears in denial over a stark reality: The Ministry of Defence faces a £28 billion shortfall over the coming years simply to make Britain’s Armed Forces ‘war-ready,’” the letter read.

“This gap—equivalent to nearly half the MoD’s annual budget—threatens to leave our forces under-equipped and overstretched at a time when readiness, already a weakness, is paramount.”

Signatories to the letter include former defence secretaries Sir Ben Wallace, Sir Grant Shapps and Sir Michael Fallon, as well as General Lord Dannatt, the former Chief of the General Staff, and Admiral Lord West, the former First Sea Lord.

The letter also accused the Government of heaping “unfunded new costs” onto the MoD, citing the Chagos Islands deal, pay rises and potential compensation for an Afghan data leak.

In June last year, Sir Keir pledged to meet Nato’s target to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035.

It included spending 3.5% on “core defence” and another 1.5% on “resilience and security”.

On Monday, the BBC reported the Prime Minister is considering bringing forward the 3% target to 2029.

Asked about the reports at an event in London earlier in the week, Sir Keir would not confirm that he was considering bringing forward the target, but said Europe needed to “step up when it comes to defence and security”.

He said: “We have a threat of Russian aggression. In a few days’ time it’s the four-year anniversary of the start of the conflict in Ukraine.

“We want a just and lasting peace, but that will not extinguish the Russian threat, and we need to be alert to that, because that’s going to affect every single person in this room, every single person in this country, so we need to step up.

“That means on defence spending, we need to go faster.”

A Government spokesperson said the Prime Minister’s Nato committment was a “a generational increase in defence and security spending, and we are well on track to meet that target”.

They said: “As demands for defence increase, we are delivering the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, with an additional £5 billion this financial year alone and £270 billion across this Parliament – ensuring no return to the hollowed out armed forces of the past.

“We make no apologies for delivering the largest pay rise in decades to our hard-working personnel and a £9 billion housing strategy to renew tens of thousands of military homes after years of neglect.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cwm Rhondda
Cwm Rhondda
2 hours ago

Everything else has been hollowed out too. A big thank you to the Conservative party for austerity the gift that just keeps on giving, a special thanks to David and George – cheers boys, austerity and Brexit. “For they’re jolly good fellows, and so say all of us”, come on everybody join in “For they’re jolly good fellows, and so say all of us”

Last edited 1 hour ago by Cwm Rhondda
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 hour ago

Lets add up how much the Ministry of Disasters have wasted before you close the book and let them off the hook, if the Home Office could throw less away imagine the potential of ‘soft power’ for defense, aid has been more effective than bombs…

If Twmp, Netanyahu and Putin could be removed from the War Game Table 70 billion people could breath more easily, of course no none is above the law, at present that is wishful thinking…

S Duggan
S Duggan
1 hour ago

Ultimately, the UK will have to go into a comprephensive partnership with other European countries to off-set some of the cost and foster co-operation. Europe has the capability to defend itself successfully if it gets it’s act together. It also shows what a mockery Brexit was and still is.

Brychan
Brychan
3 minutes ago

There’s a strange contrast between Britain and France who both currently spend about the same on defence. France, in almost all aspects gets more and better kit as well as bigger contingent of active personnel.

https://www.globalmilitary.net/compare/countries/fra-vs-gbr/

Begs the question on why? Is it waste and inefficiency or too much reliance of buying in American equipment? Just because you spend more in cash does not mean you get more effective or bigger.

Chris Hale
Chris Hale
1 minute ago

Be sceptical of calls for increased military spending from former military officials and ex-ministers and civil servants. Many’s these are paid “consultants” to arms manufacturers and suppliers.

In November 2025, Lord Dannatt was suspended from the House of Lords for breaching the code of conduct on lobbying by soliciting payments from arms manufacturers and others. He was suspended for 4 months, which by my reckoning means he is still suspended – and would appear to still be at it.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.