Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Weaponising ordinary devices violates international law, UN rights chief says

21 Sep 2024 4 minute read
The symbol of the United Nations is displayed outside the Secretariat Building, Feb. 28, 2022, at United Nations Headquarters. (AP Photo/John Minchillo.)

Weaponising ordinary communication devices represents a new development in warfare, and targeting thousands of Lebanese people using pagers, two-way radios, and electronic equipment without their knowledge is a violation of international human rights law, the United Nations human rights chief said.

Volker Turk told an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council there must be an independent and transparent investigation of the two attacks in Lebanon on Tuesday and Wednesday where these devices exploded, reportedly killing 37 people and injuring more than 3,400 others.

“Those who ordered and carried out these attacks must be held to account,” he said.

Lebanon has blamed Israel for the attacks, which appeared to target Hezbollah militants but also saw many civilian casualties, including children.

Before the council meeting, Israel’s UN ambassador Danny Danon was asked by reporters about speculation Israel was behind the two explosions.

“We are not commenting on the specific attacks you mentioned, but I can tell you that we will do everything we can to target those terrorists to minimise casualties for civilians,” he replied.

Lebanon’s foreign minister Abdallah Bouhabib accused Israel of terrorising the entire Lebanese population on streets, in markets, shops and their homes where their communications devices exploded.

Mr Bouhabib insisted that Israel not only launched the attacks but told the council there were “official declarations” and a tweet by an adviser to prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu “that was lately deleted, emphasising the responsibility of Israel and praising the positive results of this assault”.

He appeared to be referring to a deleted tweet by Netanyahu adviser Topaz Luke, who reportedly retweeted a post that included a reply indicating that Israel was behind the attacks in Lebanon and neighbouring Syria.

Israel’s Mr Danon criticised the Lebanese minister for never mentioning Hezbollah and said the Lebanese people are “trapped in the grip of this terrorist organisation”.

International law

Mr Turk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, said the explosions not only violated international human rights law but also appear to violate international humanitarian law’s key principles in carrying out attacks: distinction between civilians and combatants, proportionality, and precautions.

International law also prohibits the use of booby-trap devices that look harmless, he said, and “it is a war crime to commit violence intended to spread terror among civilians”.

“Let me be clear — this method of warfare may be new and unfamiliar,” Mr Turk said, “but international humanitarian and human rights law apply regardless and must be upheld”.

Mr Danon blamed Iran and its “puppet” Hezbollah for the military action across the Lebanon-Israel border.

“While Israel is not seeking a wider conflict, let me be clear: We will not allow Hezbollah to continue its provocations,” he said.

Israel will do “whatever it takes” to return its 60,000 citizens who fled their homes in the north because of attacks, “and we will not allow Hezbollah’s terror to dictate the future of our nation”.

Iran’s UN ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani countered that “Israel bears full responsibility for the perpetration of such horrific crimes”, and said his government will pursue accountability for the attack on the country’s ambassador to Lebanon, whose eyes were injured in the explosions on Tuesday.

He said the gravity of the attacks against the Lebanese people must also be seen as “a threat to peace and security across the region”.

He added that “the international community must not ignore the role the Western countries, in particular the United States and UK, play in enabling Israel’s aggressions”.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rob
Rob
13 days ago

It’s sick and shouldn’t be tolerated.

Mr. Sneeze
Mr. Sneeze
13 days ago

I’m sure if this was an Al-Qaeda network known to be planning a imminent campaign of terror across the UK, most would support the same action here.

Last edited 13 days ago by Mr. Sneeze
CapM
CapM
12 days ago
Reply to  Mr. Sneeze

This sort of warfare/terror has to be seen in it’s entirety
You and others may be OK when the targets are those you oppose but the cat is out of the bag and and the method is now something that anyone could use.

It’s going to be expensive for us to ensure our safety.
I think the method represents a paradigm shift in the same way as the advent
chemical/biological warfare did.

It’s grossly naive to think that only those you consider to be the “‘good guys’ will be able to use the method.

Last edited 12 days ago by CapM
Mr. Sneeze
Mr. Sneeze
11 days ago
Reply to  CapM

The usual rules of war don’t apply when the enemy is a terrorist organisation. That much became clear after 9/11. We need to accept that Israel will continue to do whatever it takes to be safe, and instead focus international efforts on a permanent resolution to the conflict that allows Israelis to live in peace and Palestinians to have a home they can be proud of. Anyone who isn’t focused on this outcome is complicit in every death that occurs.

CapM
CapM
11 days ago
Reply to  Mr. Sneeze

Today’s terrorist organisation could be tomorrow’s government.
The founding of Israel as a nation state is just one example that illustrates that point.

The pager development by a nation state should be of concern because it is a terror tactic in that not only affects the target. There are rules that nation states are expected to follow regarding this. Otherwise there is a decent into terrorism by all.

Mr. Sneeze
Mr. Sneeze
11 days ago
Reply to  CapM

When given the chance to explain how the region might move forward you declined, preferring to return the debate to how bad one side is.

It’s very revealing so many are so uninterested in how a real lasting peace in the region might happen.

It suits both the anti-Islam and anti-Jew fraternity to keep the bloodshed going.

It’s a strange unholy alliance of the left and the right.

CapM
CapM
11 days ago
Reply to  Mr. Sneeze

“When given the chance to explain how the region might move forward you declined”

I don’t think I’m in a position to offer either side advice on this issue.
But like you I think a two state solution would aid a resolution.

“preferring to return the debate to how bad one side is.”

I can’t see anything I’ve written that backs that claim up.
I have pointed out that nation states have responsibilities and are subject to standards. Admittedly that many fail to live up to.
In contrast terrorists organisations deal in terrorism.

Mr. Sneeze
Mr. Sneeze
10 days ago
Reply to  CapM

It’s not about offering advice. It’s about coming up with proposals. How might a two state solution work? A state within a state isn’t workable. You must have some ideas to suggest it.

Gareth Westacott
Gareth Westacott
12 days ago

It’s a nonsensical criticism of Israel ! When al quaeda flew aeroplanes into the twin towers,and Islamist fanatics drove lorries into crowds, or exploded countless car-bombs in crowded streets I don’t remember the UN or anyone complaining that it was a ‘violation of international rights law to ‘weaponise ordinary devices’. Ridiculous! The Fenians were ‘weaponising ordinary devices’ (ie. alarm clocks) for their time-bombs back in the late 19th century.

Last edited 12 days ago by Gareth Westacott
CapM
CapM
12 days ago

It looks ;like you’re confusing terrorist organisations or individuals with nation states and in the case of Israel a nation state which is a member of the United Nations.

It may be a frustration to you but being a nation states means being subject to certain mores and norms.
Terrorist organisations are not as the deaths of over a hundred British servicemen at the hands of Zionist terrorists in the fight to establish the state of Israel can testify.

Welsh Patriot
Welsh Patriot
12 days ago

You have to admit, this plot was rather genius!
I’m sure even Iran thought so secretly.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.