Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Welsh-built armoured vehicle may never be fit for combat – report

07 Jun 2026 3 minute read
Ajax prototype near Merthyr Tydfil (MOD photo)

Nation.Cymru staff/agencies

A Welsh-built armoured vehicle at the centre of a £6.3 billion Army programme may never be fit for combat, MPs have warned.

The Ajax reconnaissance vehicle, manufactured by General Dynamics UK in Merthyr Tydfil, has been plagued by delays and safety concerns, with a cross-party committee questioning whether it can be safely operated on the battlefield.

A report by the Commons Public Accounts Committee said there were “unrealistic expectations” about how soldiers would use the vehicle in combat and raised fresh concerns over the impact of noise and vibration on crews.

The Ajax programme was originally expected to enter service in 2017 but has suffered repeated setbacks. Although the vehicle was cleared for operations in November last year, an exercise was halted within weeks after soldiers reported symptoms linked to noise and vibration.

The committee said it remained concerned about whether Ajax was “fit for purpose”.

“Armoured vehicles which injure soldiers when they are operated outside rigid parameters will be of little use on the modern battlefield,” the report stated.

MPs also questioned Ministry of Defence guidance that requires maintenance checks every time the vehicle is stopped.

Committee chairman Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said: “Our thoughts are with all those soldiers who reported symptoms from noise and vibration after operating these vehicles, and we were frankly astounded to hear officials explain that proper use of Ajax requires maintenance checks every time it is stopped.

“This is frankly an insult to intelligence, and much good may this advice do our fighting men and women if called upon to operate Ajax in combat. The MoD must now explain how it will make Ajax fit for purpose, and how much this will cost.”

The committee warned there was a risk that the Ministry of Defence could end up spending even more money on a package of “Ajax 2” improvements in an attempt to salvage the programme.

The MPs also demanded to know how much General Dynamics would contribute towards the costs arising from delays in delivering a vehicle deemed fit for service.

The report also criticised delays to the Government’s long-awaited defence investment plan, originally expected last year but now not due until shortly before the Nato summit in Turkey next month.

Sir Geoffrey said ministers could no longer rely on arguments that more time was needed to get the details right.

“Whatever the content of the defence investment plan when it eventually does appear, the damage from its absence has been done – to the nation’s credibility, to its safety, to its armed forces, and to certainty within its entire defence industrial base,” he said.

‘Warfighting-ready’

The committee said the Ministry of Defence had yet to determine which capabilities, infrastructure and personnel it needed to make the armed forces “warfighting-ready” within the available budget, and had not secured the necessary agreement across government.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said the plan will be published before the Nato summit begins on July 7.

A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said the Government was providing a “generational increase” in defence spending, including an additional £270 billion over the course of this Parliament.

“The defence investment plan will fix the outdated, overcommitted and underfunded programme we inherited,” the spokesperson said.

“We are working hard to finalise it. As the Defence Secretary told Parliament this week, the Prime Minister is determined to publish it before the Nato Summit.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
23 days ago

Ministry of Disasters. From 1997 to now successive UK governments have left the country unable to defend itself…

Last edited 23 days ago by Mab Meirion
hdavies15
hdavies15
23 days ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

.. and unable to design its way out of a wet paper bag! Now seems that the starting point for all design work carried out for government contracts is a blank brain instead of blank sheet/screen!. Guys have been riding around in armoured vehicles for over a 100 years yet the boffins are still pretty much clueless.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
23 days ago
Reply to  hdavies15

The country is being defended by the Welsh Navy, that is the perception of the rest of the world…

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
23 days ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

Whilst J.D.(Liberty) Vance, whose praying partner @Lemmy not Lammy is looking a trifle gullible, spreads his opinions like an STD.

Vance may be a novice but he has the conviction of a convert, what he converted from God knows…

Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
23 days ago

A lot of the blame does lie with the American company building these things. It is not rocket science to build machines where vibration and noise is kept to a minimum. Just look at the CVR(T), family of seven armoured vehicles. Manufactured by Alvis back in the 1970s the Scorpion tank with rubber pads on the tracks.
These US companies whole structure is built on long development cycles draining government coffers, whether in the US or the UK. Just look at the missile crisis in the US military after the Iran War. Quick iteration just is not in their vocabulary.

Brychan
Brychan
23 days ago
Reply to  Ap Kenneth

Are you suggesting it would have been better to do a deal with the French, who have developed such a vehicle, now in service and is very succesful? The problem is Brit pandering and ‘special’ relationships.

Welsh historian
Welsh historian
23 days ago

General Dynamics are a US arms company, this rubbish design is about as Welsh as a hotdog.

Brychan
Brychan
23 days ago

Nobody knew what it was for. Then production started and then the design and requirements were changed every few months. So the result is an abomination. Wouldn’t trust the MoD to commission a bicycle. You’s start off with a fast road bike, then they’d ask it to go up mountains so you’d add in mountain bike tyres, then they’d ask for extra kit to be carried so you’d add in some panniers, then they’d ask for an extra powerful motor to make it into an e-bike. The result is it’s useless at everything.  Sadly, this is what almost all MoD… Read more »

Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
23 days ago
Reply to  Brychan

Whatever we think of the MoD the American company is responsible for building a vehicle that does not vibrate and create so much noise that it damages the people operating it. That is also incompetence.

Brychan
Brychan
23 days ago
Reply to  Ap Kenneth

Not so. The Westminster Government gave them £6.3bn and insisted on a design that was not functional, and they built it, as requested. If it wasn’t to spec they could sue for loss, but they can’t because it’s the MoD that’s at fault. You can take your car to the garage and insist on a ‘go faster’ exhaust. If it’s too noisy or reduces performance, that’s your fault, not the mechanic.

Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
23 days ago
Reply to  Brychan

The core mechanical engineering is down to General Dynamics.

Brychan
Brychan
23 days ago
Reply to  Ap Kenneth

No it wasn’t. The engine size changed twice in the spec according to reports, at the request of MoD to carry different weapons.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.