Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

Borrowed Time

20 Nov 2025 4 minute read
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves. Photo credit: Danny Lawson/PA Wire

Ben Wildsmith

With regards to the spiralling awfulness of Labour, it is difficult to identify a single trait that defines the party’s performance in 2025.

For me, the most surprising element has been the Westminster government’s incompetence. Prior to the election, I expected a Starmer administration to be dull but efficient in the middle-managerial manner that characterises Labour MPs nowadays.

Ambition will be slight, I thought, but delivery and presentation would likely be on point enough to shame the memory of shambolic Tory regimes.

In reality, the government’s lack of an overarching vision has been obscured, somewhat, by its week-to-week inability to make policies stick.

Some greatest hits in this regard include cuts to the winter fuel payment and PIP benefits, the decision not to hold a national grooming gang enquiry and even backing for swift bricks in new-build houses.

Despite enjoying an unassailable parliamentary majority, Labour has governed as if its survival were threatened from Day One.

The reason for that has become clear over the last couple of weeks. Whilst the parliamentary arithmetic looks rosy, scant few of the MPs on Labour’s benches are enthusiastic about the Prime Minister or his team.

With the Conservatives in abeyance, and Reform’s support not reflected in parliamentary seats, the de facto opposition is within Labour itself.

Yoked to an incoherent programme, with public support in freefall, and an unpopular leader, backbenchers who barely tolerated Keir Starmer and the Iago-esque Morgan McSweeney are now in open revolt.

Weakness

The government’s weakness has been most obviously betrayed by the Chancellor’s desperado performance over the last few weeks. Knowing that she lacked backbench support to raise income tax, she took the unprecedented step of nodding and winking towards the idea in a speech weeks ahead of her suspiciously late budget.

There is a reason that budgetary decisions are kept under wraps until their official announcement: leaking them in advance allows people to take market positions that evade the intended consequences of changes being made.

Reeves allowed it to be known that income tax rises were on the way, thus drawing the ire of backbenchers who fondly imagined that a wealth tax might be the Labour way of raising revenue.

What transpired then was quite extraordinary. A series of briefings suggested that ‘the markets’ would react badly if either Reeves or Starmer were replaced. Put simply, the UK public was threatened with poverty unless internal dissent in the Labour Party was quelled.

I doubt the average Labour candidate expected Starmer’s ‘changed’ Labour party to be operating an overt protection racket on behalf of international finance, but here we are.

Nothing motivates MPs, however, like the prospect of having to get a real job. So, with Labour continuing to plummet in the polls, yet another U-turn was extracted from Reeves and potential replacements for Keir Starmer began visible manoeuvres.

Bacon

Wes Streeting’s attempts to conceal ambition resembled a well-trained Staffordshire Bull Terrier drooling whilst waiting for a slice of bacon. You had the impression he could snap at any moment.

Andy Burnham, meanwhile, continues to flash tantalising glimpses of socialist leg from the Manchester stage. He’s ‘absolutely committed’ to his current role, you understand, but not above a redistributive shimmy when the cameras point his way.

Angela Rayner, fuming on her seafront balcony, can still rely on journalists to print something if she calls them up. Just you wait…

Now that Reform UK has, as Nigel Farage predicted, replaced the Tory party, it remains to be seen if Zack Polanski’s Greens will do a similar number on Labour. Plaid Cymru seem sure to hoover up the non-Reform vote here in Wales.

With potentially 3.5 years until an election, a new leader could, in theory, rescue Labour from the disaster of Starmer’s unmoored leadership.

Public expectations are low, so a competent centre-left offering that didn’t try to dogwhistle its way onto Reform’s lawn might be enough to persuade voters that the party hasn’t lost its soul.

To pull that off, though, the party’s MPs will need to act swiftly and decisively. Next to the Tories’ grave, another is already being prepared.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Colin
Colin
13 days ago

What are the chances of 81 MPs uniting behind a single challenger. Sir Keir is here until he doesn’t want the job anymore.

J Jones
J Jones
13 days ago
Reply to  Colin

But to some people democracy really sucks! Apparently no private schoolboys (or girls) in the current cabinet must rile privately educated Corbyn & Johnson, where the previous general election gave us the choice of a world champion liar and a world champion at refusing to admit his real policies. They both lived for exploiting others, whether it be via their public or private sector method, but the electorate and the system eventually saw through them. So we’re currently stuck with being told the harsh truths that unlimited benefit handouts mean unlimited tax increases to pay for them – for those… Read more »

Padi Phillips
Padi Phillips
13 days ago
Reply to  J Jones

A lot of the reason the ‘benefits bill’ being so high is the policies of consecutive governemnts, Labour or Tory wed to nonsense of neoliberal economics. Starmer and Co have been told and told and told that what is needed is a tax on wealth, not more tax on incomes, especially those in the middle-income bracket. However, and this is a serious point, go back to the mid 70s and everyone who paid income tax paid it at a rate of at least 35%. That provided enough to fund a decent welfare state and the NHS at a far more… Read more »

David J
David J
11 days ago
Reply to  J Jones

 “for those of us who do bother to work.” You clearly have no notion of how the capitalist system works. You need to realise that morality (such as you express) merely describes the world as you imagine it to be; economics, on the other hand, tells you how the world actually is. There are always a number of unemployed in a capitalist model; they are needed to take up the slack during boom periods, so if you have a job, you should be happy that (according to you) some people prefer to stay in bed. Otherwise they would be competing… Read more »

Richard Jenkins
Richard Jenkins
13 days ago

Brilliant! Pertinent, refined but raw. A sharp turn of phrase that reveals so many truths. I don’t just respect & admire @BenWildsmith. For bringing a cutting edge to Welsh journalism, I loves him!

Clive hopper
Clive hopper
13 days ago

Good stuff as usual.

Dai Hawkins
Dai Hawkins
12 days ago

“With potentially 3.5 years until an election, a new leader could, in theory, rescue Labour from the disaster of Starmer’s unmoored leadership.”~
I note the adverbial phrase.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.