Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

Could offering a referendum on rejoining the EU save Labour?

16 Aug 2025 6 minute read
Picture by Tiocfaidh (CC BY-ND 2.0)

Martin Shipton

More than 13 months after Labour returned to power, we are told that the UK Government is unlikely to achieve its growth targets and that the “black hole” in the public finances has risen to £51bn.

Some taxes will have to rise, although as a result of past promises made by the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, this won’t include Income Tax or VAT.

It seems that Gambling Tax is in her sights, as well perhaps as unearned income, although whether she has the courage to tackle the latter is uncertain.

There is, however, a certain way of improving Britain’s growth that the great majority of economists would endorse – in fact, all but the crackpot fringe who have an umbilical cord that stretches all the way to the studios of GB News.

Rejoining the EU would provide the best boost conceivable to the UK economy, and both Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer know that.

Dysfunctional

It’s a measure of the dysfunctional nature of our political system – and especially the irrational approach of Labour, who are haunted by previous decisions they made over the issue that many saw as mistakes at the time – that Brexit is hardly mentioned any more.

The other day the Telegraph, whose news agenda these days appears to be set by Robert Jenrick and the Israeli Embassy, ran a story about Britain’s falling living standards headlined “UK has lower living standards than Italy”.

The first two paragraphs read: “Britain’s living standards fell behind those in Italy for the first time since 2001 in a fresh blow to Rachel Reeves’s efforts to boost economic growth and renew the nation’s competitiveness.

“Slow growth, rising joblessness and high inflation are all damaging Britain, raising fears it is losing its status as a rich nation at the same time as Italy shakes off its economic basket case image. When adjusted for the cost of living, GDP per capita is now higher in Italy than in the UK.”

The word ‘Brexit’ was omitted – perhaps unsurprisingly, considering that the Telegraph has long been designed to appeal to the most Blimpish elements of the English middle class, with a natural suspicion of Johnny Foreigner in all his guises.

I’m not a regular reader, but I doubt that the Telegraph was first out of the blocks when reporting the findings of an opinion poll that showed that just 29% of voters would back staying out of the EU if a new referendum was held on the issue now.

So what’s stopping Labour from ditching its omerta around the mention of Brexit, and advocating a referendum on reapplying for membership of the EU?

Paradox

Thinking about this conundrum leads to the paradox at the heart of current British politics. Why is Reform UK, led by the architect of Brexit Nigel Farage, leading the polls at a time when Brexit is less popular than it’s ever been?

Most of the answer is that while people can choose from a list of multiple parties when deciding who to vote for in a general election, the choice in a referendum is binary. So while the support of 31% of those voting may potentially be enough to secure Reform an overall majority in a first-past-the-post general election, it would be nowhere near enough to win another referendum for those who want the UK to stay out of the EU.

What also needs to be taken into account is the fact that some voters see a referendum as an opportunity to give the government of the day a kicking, without factoring in a consideration of the consequences.

That’s certainly what happened in 2016.

And there’s another category of perversity that caters for those reconciled to holding apparently contradictory and irreconcilable opinions simultaneously – like being a Conservative supporter who would vote for an independent Wales in a referendum.

Such people do exist, as pollsters will happily explain.

It’s clear to me that if Labour offered a fresh referendum on EU membership, Reform’s guns could be spiked. Farage’s mantra of “Brexit is ancient history, it’s time to move on” would no longer cut the mustard.

It’s a ridiculous point anyway, given the negative impact that Brexit has on our spending power and trading potential every day. But forcing Farage to take responsibility for the economic dislocation he is responsible for through his advocacy of Brexit, allied to his shameful admiration for the likes of Trump and Putin, would place him on the defensive in a new referendum.

As would the fact that Brexit has exacerbated the small boats crisis rather than cured it.

Superficially attractive (to some) demagogues like Farage need to be confronted and exposed if they are to be defeated.

Useless

Starmer’s reluctance to show leadership and take on Farage will lead to a crushing defeat for Labour in 2029 if the current tame and frankly useless strategy remains in place.

Blaenau Gwent Labour MS Alun Davies has embraced the idea of a new referendum. He said: “Reform want to talk about everything except Brexit. That’s because there’s nothing to be said in its favour.

“Despite what Nigel Farage and the others who promoted it said before the referendum, its impact on Britain has been wholly negative.

“Nobody, including the Brexiteers, puts forward any longer the argument that Brexit is to Britain’s economic advantage. Everyone can see that hasn’t been the case.

“Brexit has made Britain less competitive. It’s led to more costs for business and therefore prices have risen.

“The Labour Party shouldn’t be afraid of pointing out that it’s very much in the interests of the UK to have access to the European single market. At the next general election, Labour should promise a referendum on rejoining the EU. It could put forward the case that resuming our place in the world’s biggest single market would help us achieve the economic growth we need to create greater prosperity.”

‘European’

Asked whether he thought Keir Starmer would be prepared to offer such a referendum, Mr Davies said: “Keir Starmer is fundamentally a European. I think he understands that when all is said and done, Britain’s future is in the EU.

“Everything he’s done in relation to Europe has been geared to rebooting the relationship with the EU. With all the destabilising events that are happening in the world, we should be working in close cooperation with our European neighbours in terms of trade, as well as defence and security, rather than creating unnecessary barriers.”

More people in Labour should champion the cause of a new referendum if they want to avoid not just the humiliation of defeat but the horror of austerity on steroids that a Reform government would lead to.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Amir
Amir
3 months ago

I am not sure anything can really save labour. The way deform and garage influences their policies suggests the way things will go at the next election. Rather than acting like Labour they tried to copy deform. Rather than focusing on cost of living crisis, public services and going green they are overtaking the least well off rather than the other way around, public services, don’t care about them and let’s talk about extracting more oil and reduce freedom of expression when it involves Palestine.

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
3 months ago

I think UK Labour might consider holding an EU referendum if they feel the polls look bleak towards the end of their term in office with the hope the carrot and stick of rejoining will save them from electoral oblivion.

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago

It should offer the choice of rejoining the political union, rejoining the economic partnership or sticking with Johnson’s deal. And ask people to rank them in order of preference.

smae
smae
3 months ago
Reply to  Bryce

There’s no such choice available. The EU have already pointed out, it’s everything or nothing from an EU point of view. If you want the economic partnership you must join the political union.

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  smae

Meanwhile, Switzerland.

Steve
Steve
3 months ago
Reply to  Bryce

Meanwhile, Switzerland (not in the EU)…

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  Steve

In the economic partnership, not the political union.

Jeff
Jeff
3 months ago

Save the uk you mean.
Do it. Fartage will have to defend the mess he created and he cannot.

Valley girl
Valley girl
3 months ago
Reply to  Jeff

The Dublin agreement is changing and all EU countries will be expected to share the weight of immigration and this will be in Farage’s favour.

Rob
Rob
3 months ago

At the very least we should remain part of the Single Market and Customs Union. How many times were we told be Leave Campaigners that ‘we can be like Norway’?

Thomas
Thomas
3 months ago
Reply to  Rob

Sorry to break it to you, but Norway is not part of the Customs Union.

Peter J
Peter J
3 months ago

I feel there has been a lack of learning about how the EU operates within the UK. The best of labour could offer is a referendum on ‘applying for EU membership.’ There is no backroom deal that could be done with the UK to agree membership before applying. The UK could then use its democratic mandate to submit an application under article 49. The EC will then assess it against the Copenhagan criteria, which does require some legal changes in the UK, possibly even a change to how the HoL operates. Once this has been done, they will then have… Read more »

Thomas
Thomas
3 months ago
Reply to  Peter J

Never mind Hungary and Solvenia, France vetoed the UK joining the Common Market on two occasions. Like you say, rejoining is not as easy as many people like to pretend.

Peter J
Peter J
3 months ago
Reply to  Thomas

Yea, I think that too given the current mix of their parliament.
But UK rejoining is not on anyone’s radar. It’s just an internal UK debate now

John Ellis
John Ellis
3 months ago

‘So what’s stopping Labour from ditching its omerta around the mention of Brexit, and advocating a referendum on reapplying for membership of the EU?’ Certainly there aren’t any convinced Brexiteers in the current Westminster government, nor, indeed and as far as one can tell, are there any obvious ones among backbench Labour MPs. But in a national context where maybe as many as a quarter – and maybe more – of the electorate still tend toward favouring being out of the EU or at the least would be opposed to reopening the whole enormously fractious ‘Europe’ debate all over again,… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by John Ellis
Undecided
Undecided
3 months ago

As an ardent remainer, I have long since concluded that Brexit is every bit as bad as I thought it would be a decade ago. However I do have a problem with those who effectively argue that you have two or more referendums until you get the result you want. It happened in Ireland over Maastricht. The SNP want it on Scottish independence and I can only imagine the indignation if another referendum on Welsh devolution was suggested.

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  Undecided

That’s why fixing the democratic deficit in the original vote is the best option. No-one was asked what kind of Brexit they wanted.

Undecided
Undecided
3 months ago
Reply to  Bryce

On balance, I would have to disagree. We can debate all day whether we should have had a harder or softer Brexit or something in between – and whether the Leave campaign deployed falsehoods against a complacent and truly awful Remain campaign (both the case in my opinion). But the fact remains that the majority voted to exit. As Lyn E has said we could rejoin the Customs Union and the Single Market. No one voted against that.

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  Undecided

The problem is that Brexit means Brexit. Without a vote confirming we can rejoin the economic partnership (single market) the cries of betrayal won’t go away.

Steve
Steve
3 months ago

Labour are done; self-inflicted and hopefully consigned to the history books. Betrayal after betrayal, lie after lie.

Peter J
Peter J
3 months ago
Reply to  Steve

What lie and betrayal are you talking about? I’m not trying to be difficult just generally curious

smae
smae
3 months ago
Reply to  Peter J

Child benefit cap? Scrap tuition fees? Roll back anti-trade union legislation to normality? Increase in National Insurance contributions? National wealth fund for supporting growth and clean energy? Training GPs? Tried to and are still trying to cut disability and welfare, effectively destroying our safety net that is already stretched thin as it is. Cut back WFH from those in need only to be forced to put it back later. Ending asylum hotels? Building 1.5 million new homes? Chose not to scrap private schools charitable status? Climbing down on raising tax for the top 5% of earners. Nationalization of public services?… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by smae
Peter J
Peter J
3 months ago
Reply to  smae

Interesting comment. So just on your first paragraph… Labour didn’t promise to scrap the child benefit cap. The roll back on ‘anti-trade union’ legalisation receives royal assent this autumn. Labour haven’t actually broken an election promise by raising NI -they only did this for employers. (Obviously, the public finances are so spectacularly bad, they will have the break that promise sooner or later).   The national wealth fund was created last year and has committed 6bn in investments. Given the success, Reeves actually raised the investment sum earlier this year – so it will be bigger than they promised at… Read more »

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  Peter J

And as ever, the left-left with distorted posts like the OPs is doing its best to support the Tories, and now their militant wing Reform, back into power, so they can sleep soundly at night knowing when they wake up there will be a comic book enemy in power to protest against without having to deal with the responsibilities, complexities and compromises of actual government.

Peter J
Peter J
3 months ago
Reply to  Bryce

Left wingers and nationalists are going to have decide between reform or labour. Possibly a labour lib dem coalition.
Going on the last 10 years, they’ll pick reform! God knows why they’re so puritan in their views

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  Peter J

Because they don’t want things to get better. If the poor become better off, the marginalised recognised and valued, and workers are empowered, whatever will they protest about?

They are regressives in progressive clothing, small-c conservatives that just pretend to oppose the Conservatives they need to be in power to give their own lives meaning and purpose.

Paul ap Gareth
Paul ap Gareth
3 months ago

While the polling suggests public support for joining the EU. Labour would go into the election with a policy that newspaper owners are fiercely opposed. However since media has already decided that they want Farage to win the next election there is a certain amount of logic to promising a referendum. It will focus the next general election on the false promises that Farage (et al) made in 2016 and highlight the failure of Farage’s political achievement, ensuring that the focus isn’t just on Labour’s record. It will also create a binary choice for the electorate Brexit with Farage or… Read more »

Valley girl
Valley girl
3 months ago

The Dublin agreement is being updated and all EU countries will be expected to share the pressure of immigration equally. This may deter people voting back in so to speak.

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  Valley girl

Isn’t taking a few thousand vetted genuine refugees better than 45,000 unknowns?

John Young
John Young
3 months ago

I created a thread on the Swansea Independent football forum about this exact point. If they went into the next election with a manifesto commitment on a rejoin referendum they may very well win another term. The ref would then happen in 2032/33 which would be sixteen years after the first one so no one could argue that it’s ‘too early’.

Lyn E
Lyn E
3 months ago

Rejoining the single market and customs union is more plausible than seeking to rejoin the EU, and would provide the economic benefits. If clearly promised in a manifesto, it would not require a referendum as it does not raise the issues of political sovereignty that rejoining the EU would. It would also be easier to negotiate.

John Boxall
John Boxall
3 months ago

Does the EU want us back though?

Having had to deal with Brexit they would want to see several years of cross party political support and majority public support before being willing to entertain Britain rejoining.

Peter J
Peter J
3 months ago
Reply to  John Boxall

Some do, but many don’t! This point has been made by so many European politicians and widely ignored by UK media and remainers – they are sometimes as delusional as the people who wanted to leave in the first place.
All the UK can do is apply, the EU then decides on the application. Orban will definitely oppose, many other eastern European nations aren’t too excited by the prospect of the UK coming back. At the moment, I can’t even see the French parliament approving it

Bryce
Bryce
3 months ago
Reply to  John Boxall

Rejoining also means accepting the Euro, losing Thatcher’s 66% discount and no veto.

Adam
Adam
3 months ago

Nothing can save Labour. The final kick in the teeth was complete refusal to devolve the crown estate. That action was so despicable and shameful that they should not be forgiven. Labour despise Wales only slightly less than Reform.
Send them to the history books with their friends the Tories.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.