Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

If we want Welsh history taught properly, we must make it compulsory

21 Feb 2026 7 minute read
Dwylo Gleision (Blue Hands): Meinir Mathias

Martin Johnes, Professor of Welsh history at Swansea University.

In 1907, the first step towards the devolution of education was taken with the creation of a Welsh Board of Education to oversee schools funded by the state. Its head was Owen M. Edwards, a history professor who had endured the Welsh Not in his own education.

He was determined that schools should meet the needs of the Welsh nation and recognised that a knowledge of a nation’s history could inspire confidence and patriotism in its people.

One of the Board’s first steps was to issue a new regulation that the history of Wales should be taught in every school.

In the absence of any kind of national curriculum, the state actually had little direct control over what happened in classrooms and which specific topics subjects like history focussed on.

The new directive on Welsh history was not widely followed and Wales remained a peripheral or non-existent part of most children’s history education, marginalised in favour of stories of English Kings and Queens.

This was partly rooted in what teachers felt they knew and their sense of what history should be, but another problem was a lack of suitable Welsh history textbooks.

Consequently, a series of textbooks were published to support the teaching of Welsh history but these were not widely adopted.

More than a century later, the situation remains similar. The creation of a National Curriculum in the late 1980s again required the history of Wales to be taught and gave some direction on which topics this should entail, but this specificity has been lost with the new Curriculum for Wales.

This requires that all schools teach the history of Wales until GCSE but it has no requirements over what that should entail or what proportion of history teaching should focus on Wales.

Instead there is a general statement that pupils should receive ‘consistent exposure to the story of their locality and the story of Wales’. But what this means in practice is left in the hands of individual schools and teachers.

‘Cerrig Cochion’ (Red Stones) Image copyright: Meinir Mathias

The precise results of this are not entirely clear. Welsh Government does not collect data about what topics are taught within schools and thus does not know what its requirement for the teaching of Welsh history is leading to in practice.

It did commission a small-scale report from Estyn, published in 2021. Estyn found that in primary schools there was some enthusiasm for teaching local history, but in a few schools there was no Welsh history taught at all. In secondary schools, the picture was worse.

Estyn concluded: “In many secondary schools, lessons include only cursory references to local and Welsh history. Teachers do not plan opportunities for pupils to develop a coherent knowledge and understanding of the local area and Wales across periods.”

Most pupils thus seem to leave school with some knowledge of their local area and a few events in Welsh history, but little sense of how these things connect or the overall history of Wales, as both a nation in its own right and as part of the United Kingdom.

Like more than century ago, there is an assumption that part of the problem is resources and the government is investing in the creation of new Welsh history materials for schools. But no matter how good these are, there is no guarantee they will be used.

Teachers often prefer to stick to topics they know and understand and to resources that experience has shown work in the classroom. The provision of Welsh history is caught in a vicious circle where teachers do not learn much about it in their own education and then do not feel equipped to teach it in their own careers.

There is, I believe, a genuine desire in Welsh Government to see more Welsh history taught.

Online claims that a unionist Labour government is denying Welsh children knowledge of their national past to stop them becoming nationalists are farfetched.

But Welsh Government is wedded to one of the central principles of its Curriculum for Wales – that schools should not be told what knowledge they should teach.

If schools have the freedom to choose what subject matter they teach, they have the freedom to continue with what they are already doing, no matter what a government wants to happen.

The result of this is that the teaching of Welsh history in schools remains bitty and inconsistent.

Inside The Senedd by .Martin. is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0.

Labour and Plaid Cymru have repeatedly stated their commitment to ensuring that Welsh history is taught in our schools. If they are serious about wanting that to happen in a meaningful and consistent way, then a significant change of policy is needed.

Commissioning more resources is not going to achieve any significant transformation. Nor will strengthening guidance. Instead, what is required is specific compulsion.

This does not need to extend too far. It does not need a complete overhaul of the Curriculum for Wales or an abandonment of all its principles.

The government could simply mandate a compulsory ‘Wales’ course to be taken under the Humanities Area of Learning in Year 8. The course could offer pupils an overview of the key events in the history of Wales. These would not need to be events unique to Wales. Teaching Wales’s roles in the slave trade and the world wars, for example, matters too. There could be accompanying material and activities tailored to the different regions of Wales to ensure the commitment to local history is not lost. It could also look at key poems and novels in both our languages.

Most importantly, the course could go right up to the present day and include coverage of how the Senedd works, the state of Wales and Welsh society today. That would ensure the Curriculum’s aspirations to teach Welsh citizenship and political knowledge are actually delivered.

Some will fear that such a venture is too political. But education is political. Deciding to teach any topic is a political question. The Welsh language is taught to all children because there is a broad political consensus that this is a good thing. It is difficult to imagine any serious opposition to the idea that Welsh history should be taught properly.

Any opposition to a mandatory Wales course is likely to come from fears over how it will be taught and what might be derived from it. But history does not offer any simple lessons for today and can be read in different ways. If the material is designed correctly, it will make the children ask questions about the nature of Wales as much as it will give them answers.

The authorities have required the teaching of the history of Wales for more than 100 years. That has not delivered any consistency for pupils.

There are schools that teach a lot of Welsh history and others that teach very little. For individual pupils this matters less than questions around literacy and numeracy, but if we are serious about preserving Welsh identity and Welsh culture and wanting people to engage with our young democracy, we need people to understand that Wales matters. They do not need to agree why or how, but discussion should come from a basis of shared knowledge.

The Curriculum for Wales does not deliver that and no amount of new Welsh history resources are going to change that.

If Welsh Government is serious about its commitment to Welsh history, it needs to abandon its commitment for a completely open curriculum.

It needs to move towards the idea that, even just for one year in one subject, there is some specific knowledge that every pupil should learn.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cwm Rhondda
Cwm Rhondda
1 month ago

Professor Johnes you write in your article that education is political, but consider the unionist Labour party’s involvement not exposing Welsh children to Welsh history farfetched? You also seem to say that teachers are seemingly ill equiped to teach Welsh history because they only teach what they are comfortable teaching and that there a dearth of Welsh history resources. I’m no expert in teaching of history in different countries, but I’m confident that most countries teach their own history as a fundamental tenant of their history curriculum.

Brian T S
Brian T S
1 month ago

As a leading academic I’d expect more supporting evidence for this piece. The facts remain that for what ever reason our children know more about Henry VIII than they do about Owain Glyndŵr. The political leadership in Wales are responsible for the education system in Wales – are they not?

Martin Johnes
Martin Johnes
1 month ago
Reply to  Brian T S

This article says the problem is the curriculum and calls on Welsh Government to change it to ensure more Welsh history is taught. This obviously isn’t going to happen before the election but I hope Plaid Cymru might be open to changing the curriculum.

Gwyn Williams
Gwyn Williams
1 month ago
Reply to  Martin Johnes

Surely, as Labour has been the Welsh Government for the past quarter century it has had the opportunity to ensure that the curriculum was for for purpose. Unless of course Labour didn’t really want the Story of Wales effectively told in our schools. Could this have anything to do with Labour’s unionist political stance, possibly?

Martin Johnes
Martin Johnes
1 month ago
Reply to  Gwyn Williams

If the current history curriculum is simply the product of Labour’s unionist stance, then how do we explain Plaid Cymru’s support for it? Neither party has been open enough to accepting the view that the curriculum is flawed.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 month ago

Language without History…!

I was surprised 25 years ago how few there were of us doing Hanes Cymru in Aber…

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 month ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

Compulsory: You had better teach some teachers first…how’s the Prif Athro doing…LoL

Joe 90
Joe 90
1 month ago

A few years ago Liz Saville-Roberts delivered a speech in the Commons part of which referenced Glyndŵr’s Senedd held in Machynlleth. Sir Chris Bryant proud Labour Knight of the Realm rose and shouted “it never happened, it never happened”. This Prof Johnes is the Labour party live in action denying us our history. Could I suggest that Sir Chris read Gideon Brough’s book on the subject of the Senedd in Machynlleth.

Martin Johnes
Martin Johnes
1 month ago
Reply to  Joe 90

I’m not sure how an article calling for more Welsh history to be taught can be interpreted as ‘denying us our history’.

Joe 90
Joe 90
1 month ago
Reply to  Martin Johnes

I agree 100% that your article calls for more Welsh history to be taught in Welsh schools. It isn’t your call to action I have issue with, it is the role the Labour party including Sir Chris have had in ‘denying us our history’. If it isn’t the Labour party then who or what has denied us our history being taught in our schools.

Adam
Adam
1 month ago

If accurate Welsh history was taught in schools, our English neighbors would be helping us fight for independence.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 month ago
Reply to  Adam

American spelling…

And
And
1 month ago

Couldn’t have put this better myself Martin. Was very obvious when the local history aspect came in that it was some kind of attempt to derail tbh. Its like… where was this local history going to come from? What sources were going to be used? Same goes for Welsh history as a whole; WG under Plaid should be investing in creating that Welsh perspective of our past – because that’s what they dont want. That narrative that breaks the 1066-Tudor conformity taught within Welsh history now.

Dave
Dave
1 month ago

Welsh history has been compulsory in Curriculum for Wales since 2022. Please see the Statements of What Matters for humanities. Welsh government recently strengthened the wording to make this absolutely clear.

Martin Johnes
Martin Johnes
27 days ago
Reply to  Dave

It is compulsory (as it was before CfW) but there’s no definition of what that means in practice. The result is significant variation between schools. This article argues there needs to be a curriculum that goes beyond this and introduces mandatory content.

Joe 90
Joe 90
1 month ago

The factors affecting the Brexit vote and rise of Reform UK in Cymru are many and varied. I’d posit that amongst those factors is that our children in Cymru are taught history through English eyes. English history is
imperialist in nature, people’s new found love for nostalgia is also part of the English story – a longing for the long gone empire. Labour are helping to fuel the English narrative by their education polices.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.