Labour’s Brexit denial is damaging the UK – it’s time to rejoin the customs union

Martin Shipton
With Reform UK’s racist obsessions largely dominating the political discourse, it was refreshing to see a sensible legislative proposal getting some traction this week.
The Liberal Democrats’ spokesman on Europe Dr Al Pinkerton, a former associate professor in geopolitics at Royal Holloway, University of London, proposed a Bill that, if passed, would oblige the UK Government to negotiate Britain’s re-entry to the EU’s customs union.
The Bill won a vote on its first reading with a majority of just one. So far as our 32 MPs are concerned, the proposition was backed by David Chadwick, the Lib Dems’ sole MP in Wales; Plaid Cymru’s quartet of Ann Davies, Ben Lake, Llinos Medi and Liz Saville-Roberts; and Labour’s principled Gower MP Tonia Antoniazzi.
All of Labour’s 26 other MPs from Wales chose to abstain. The Bill will return to the Commons later, regrettably with little chance of passing into law.
Everyone sensible knows that it was utter folly for the UK to leave the EU, and one recent estimate suggests there are now eight million more Remainers than Leavers in the UK. Most people understand the economic damage that has been inflicted on Britain by Brexit.
Yet the Labour Party stubbornly refuses to contemplate returning to the customs union, the single market or, heaven forbid, full membership of the EU.
In his House of Commons speech proposing our return to the customs union, Pinkerton states the bare facts: “Up and down the country, businesses know it, the public feel it and it is time that this House found the courage to lift our whispered voices and admit it: Brexit has been an abject economic failure. It has choked business investment, shattered economic resilience, strangled trade, shrunk the economy and left every single one of us poorer.
“ … Far from ‘taking back control’, today our country feels more precarious than ever. We lurch from crisis to crisis, uncertain of who we are, what we stand for or whether our children will be better off tomorrow than those who came before. Far from becoming a buccaneering ‘global Britain’, the UK is today weaker and more isolated than at any point in our recent history.
“Far from lowering food and living costs or slashing regulation, British businesses are now buried under 2 billion bits of red tape that stretch 15 times around the circumference of the Earth, all while the cost of living spirals even higher.
“Far from securing the transformative trading arrangements they promised, the government has delivered only Australia and New Zealand deals worth a combined 0.1% to UK GDP and exposed British farmers to tougher competition and diluted protections. The India deal would add just 0.13%, and the much-heralded US agreement has shrunk from a growth opportunity into damage limitation following Trump’s tariffs.
“Meanwhile, we have erected new barriers to our largest market, the European Union, which continues to represent around half of our global trade.
“Just last month, the National Bureau of Economic Research, a leading US think-tank, published a decade-long analysis concluding that Brexit has reduced UK GDP by between 6% and 8%. The House of Commons Library shows that Brexit is now costing the Treasury up to £90bn every single year in lost tax receipts—money that could be supporting our NHS, our defence spending and our public services.”
Tax burden
The day after the Bill won its first reading, Plaid Cymru’s Westminster leader Liz Saville-Roberts tackled Keir Starmer on this issue during Prime Minister’s Questions. She said: ‘“Let me put this plainly. The most dishonest campaign in modern British political history promised that Brexit would save £350 million a week. Instead, Brexit is now costing this country £250 million every single day. That is why we have the highest tax burden in 70 years. That is why families face sky-high bills. That is why we remain trapped in a cost of living crisis. This is the lived reality of the very working people the government claims to champion, but for whom they show neither the resolve nor the political will to protect.
“The Prime Minister just said that he wanted a closer relationship with Europe, but he then referenced the Labour party manifesto. Wales has been hit hardest by Brexit—exports are down by a third. When will he admit that the only solution to the chaos imposed by Brexit is to rejoin the customs union and the single market, or is he too afraid of what his party might say?”
Starmer’s response was pitiful, on several levels: “I went to Solihull to see the Jaguar Land Rover workforce before we got the deal with President Trump. They were worried sick that they were going to lose their jobs -that would be a loss for them, their families and their communities.
“I took the call from President Trump, when we got the deal, in Solihull at JLR, so that the first people I could tell were the workforce, who knew very well that it meant their jobs were safeguarded.
“We have also just done a deal on pharma, which is the first of its kind, and the best of its kind, in the world. It is not sensible or fair to the JLR workforce, or to the pharma sector, to say that, having achieved those things now, we should unravel them through discussion of a customs union. I just do not think that is a sensible way to take our country forward.”
Punitive tariffs
The reason why the JLR workers were worried about their jobs was because there is a lunatic in the White House who was threatening to impose punitive tariffs on foreign cars to the detriment of his own and other countries’ economy.
Equally, Trump had been threatening to impose tariffs on pharmaceutical drugs. Instead, the deal reached with the UK exempted tariffs on medicines from the UK that are sold to the US but imposed a significant increase in the cost of medicines supplied by the US to the UK.
The fact is that Starmer finds himself in the humiliating position of having to suck up to Trump out of fear that the UK would otherwise be punished economically. Our foolish decision to come out of the EU has left us isolated and more vulnerable to Trump’s bullying.
Yet Starmer refuses to contemplate standing up to Trump and claiming the bigger prize of economic growth inside the customs union.
Orwellian
Aligning ourselves with Trump rather than with the rest of Europe is to play a dangerous game. There have already been clear signs that the US under Trump is becoming an authoritarian state veering towards fascism. The proposal that foreign tourists wanting to visit the US should submit for inspection their social media accounts Those with views considered unacceptable won’t be allowed in – proving that Trump’s posturing about free speech is an Orwellian sham.
There can be no doubt that if Reform UK came to power in the UK, they would copy Trump’s repressive ideas. That cannot be allowed to happen.
The best thing Starmer could do now would be to start negotiations for re-entry to the customs union and promise a referendum on returning to the EU. That should spike Farage’s guns.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Labour is scared of Reform. Scared that if it started rejoining negotiations with the EU it’ll lose more votes to the far right party. However, Labour is doomed if it doesn’t seek rejoining – there just won’t be enough money to change things before 2029. Sadly though, it will take time to rejoin and not really enough time for Labour to fully benefit from it. However, rejoin it must or the only projectory is down especially with a Reform government that will destroy the country. As for Cymru it really needs a Plaid government and then to get the hell… Read more »
I think you underestimate the ill-will felt against the UK. The manner of departure hasn’t been forgotten. All the UK can do is reapply – but no chance this all EU states will unanimously agree for the Uk to be given candidate status. In fact, at least 1/2 member states will reject a UK application. It’s a pointless debate, sorry
EU totally insulted by Farage, Gill and co, they should be pilloried…
Hang on, one is banged up for being a traitor while the other could be prime minister…nuts!
I suggest that if Reform UK does further increase its voter support next May in the Welsh, Scottish and English local government elections with the inevitable consequence that media speculation that Reform might form the next Westminster government will become even more fevered, there’s little point in attempting to reforge Britain’s broken links with the EU even in a very limited way.
Because, should support for Reform still continue to rise, EU member states will be taking the situation in the UK on board, and are very likely to conclude that there’s little point in pursuing the matter at all.
You make fair points; but it’s only a matter of time before Reform implodes. Rejoining the Customs Union provides a clear platform against Farage and could hasten his demise. In my view, Reform’s current polling reflects disillusionment with Labour and Tories, not opinion on Europe. There is a clear majority recognising Brexit as a disaster. That said, the article wrongly conflates rejoining the EU with rejoining the Customs Union. We can’t do the former without a referendum and we ain’t going to get one in the foreseeable. But I don’t recall anything on the ballot paper about the Single Market.
If you do not start the talks, then you never find out.
I don’t think it is as hopeless as that. Yes, there may be resentment over the manner of the UK’s departure, and rejoining would not be quick or easy, but EU accession is a political process, not a permanent moral judgment. Member states act in their own interests. A large neighbouring country aligning with EU rules, contributing financially, and strengthening collective security would be attractive to many. The war in Ukraine has also changed Europe’s strategic outlook. The dual threat of an increasingly aggressive Russia alongside an unpredictable United States under the Trump regime is pushing European nations to cooperate… Read more »
I hope you’re right. But looking at recent SAFE program negotiations suggest countries such as France are quite happy to leave us out of security collaboration – where we provide significant added value. So doubt they’re happy to give on trade, FOM etc
If there is any ill-will, you will find it directed against the English. I don’t think an independent Scotland and Cymru will have too much difficulty, provided they comply with the entry conditions all new members must conform to. Of course it will take a long time, so there is not a moment to lose…
it is fairly accepted, that any move closer to the EU will mean significant financial contributions to the EU budget, regulatory alignment and freedom of movement of people – even if it is just CU, and taht’s before we start talking about SM or swiss style deals. Plus we would have no ‘say’ on these matters. This is going to be a tough sell to the british people. It;s worth remembering also that a lot of the damage done is ‘baked’ into our future- rejoining CU won’t reverse much of the damage done by leaving the CU, sadly. I was… Read more »
Did you actually read the article? In it Martin Shipton points out that there are now 8 million more peole who are in favour of being inside the EU than those who are still deluded enough to believe that going it alone is a good idea. All of us know that membership of the EU, or wvne the CU means freedom of movement – what is so wrong with that, unless you’re a racist? All the benefits accruing from membership of the CU, or even full membership of the EU will be over and above the costs incurred by membership.… Read more »
yes, I’ve read it- it’s not balance and it’s not realistic. It completely downplays the complexity and political resistance from an EU perspective. Yes mood internally has changed. But it hasn’t where it matters- in the EU, which is far more important. In fact, it’s noticeable how the UK is rarely mentioned in european papers or at EU meets- you don’t strike me as someone who reads them, but I can assure you we’ve dropped down in terms of importance. I have no issue with FOM, but it’s not me needing convincing, and I think to imply if you’re anti… Read more »
Of course we are not mentioned- we are not EU members. Not all anti-FOM are fascists, but all fascists are anti-FOM, along with the racists, xenophobes and those whose lives are so constipated that they see no benefit to themselves at being able to live and work in 27 other countries as well as their own. And as for the cost of membership, it is an investment; 10-15 billion a year, compared to an extra 80-100 billion in increased trade, which translates to around 40 billion in extra money going to the state. That is enough to solve most of… Read more »
While personally I entirely share your view that ‘the UK needs to be as close to the EU as it can possibly be, not apart from it’, and indeed repeated opinion polling does suggest that a majority of the UK public now regrets Brexit, I’m not confident that those regrets would hold if the UK made any serious attempt to reverse it, even in a decidedly cautious and limited way. The hard truth is surely (a) that a very significant minority of voters still back the idea of Brexit and (b) the largest segment of our media is owned and… Read more »
You should remember that it was only one quarter of the population that voted for it (17.4 million) A lot of them will have died off by now , given the voting demographics, so I think you are unduly pessimistic.
I believe that the emphasis on re-entry to only the customs union is too cautious. The evidence that Brexit has contracted GDP, weakened investment, and imposed barriers on Wales’ and the UK’s largest market is overwhelming. The Westminster government’s refusal to countenance rejoining the customs union or single market — despite a symbolic Commons vote — shows a reluctance to confront reality.  Partial fixes such as rejoining the customs union will not restore the economic integration lost by leaving the European Union. The customs union reduces tariffs between members, but does not eliminate non-tariff barriers, regulatory divergence, or the… Read more »
Starmer is terrified of anything that is controversial. He is, by far, the most timid PM I can ever remember and I have followed politics for a long time. On every issue, he takes the path of least resistance, rather than what is going to work better – whether it is changes to the Brexit agreement, standing up to Trump, a different approach to the economy and a fairer deal for Wales. The only thing Starmer feels ok with is bashing any opposition politicians whoever they are. We have a country stagnating, with a PM without purpose, direction or ideas… Read more »
A pivot to the EU will give farage a major issue. He will have to defend his mess.
Re entry is the only way and I really do not care if we have to adopt the Euro. Its just a token for goods.
Brexit has proof that farages little mess has been a massive hit on the the UK economy and security and we risk worse the longer we remain out.
I would love it if we had the euro; not only would we save a lot on exchanging money for our trips abroad, we would also be spared the sight of a gurning royal portrait every time we opened our wallets.
Wales must go it alone.
There’s no going back, there is only going forward. We need to increase cooperation in all areas of mutual benefit, starting with rejoining the Dublin agreement to stop the boats and tackle the challenge of global migration effectively and humanely in partnership with our continental friends. As for the customs union, the Swiss don’t participate so it’s not necessary for a Swiss style arrangement. We should make sure it’s right for us before jumping in for the sake of closer alignment. We may one day rejoin a political project but it’s likely to look very different (hopefully better) to the… Read more »
Thanks to Brexit the UK is now Trump’s b***h