Labour’s Welsh sanctuary: a masterclass in political self-harm

David Taylor
Few things are more dispiriting than watching politicians you broadly support shoot themselves in both feet. Wales’s Nation of Sanctuary initiative has become a case study in how the urge to appear different from England, combined with weak political judgment, can turn a popular policy into a self-inflicted crisis.
Since 2019, the Welsh Government has spent around £55 million under the Nation of Sanctuary banner. The vast majority has gone to supporting Ukrainian refugees who arrived through legal UK government schemes. Helping Ukrainians fleeing Putin’s invasion commands near-universal public support. There was no controversy in the policy itself.
So how did Welsh Labour manage to make a mess of it?
Moral leadership
The problem lies not in what was done, but in how it was presented. Rather than making a straightforward case for supporting Ukraine, ministers tried to turn the programme into a statement of Welsh moral leadership. A practical humanitarian commitment was wrapped in sweeping rhetoric about Wales as a “sanctuary” for all refugees and asylum seekers, implying a compassion that set it apart from Westminster.
This played well with the Cardiff Bay establishment but left the policy wide open to attack. Reform UK and others now portray the programme as an open-door immigration scheme. The claim is false, but it resonates because ministers blurred those boundaries when it suited them. It is hard to rebut misinformation when it rests on your own exaggeration.
With Reform seemingly on course for victory in the Caerphilly by-election, Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru are now protesting loudly about the public’s supposed misunderstanding of the policy. But the confusion is entirely of their own making. The narrative now being weaponised against them is the same one they promoted when it played in their favour: vague, self-congratulatory language that was never grounded in what the programme actually did.
Broader weakness
This episode exposes a broader weakness in Welsh politics. The problem isn’t that Wales copies Westminster, but that it constantly feels the need to prove it doesn’t. Policy is too often driven by the desire to appear distinct and morally superior rather than by what works. The result is a system that mistakes gesture for governance – guided by vanity, ideology and the reflex to sound kinder than England, whatever the outcome.
For years, this culture went largely unchallenged. With limited scrutiny, a comfortable political class and a weak opposition, the Senedd has become a place where appearance too often outranks achievement. The Nation of Sanctuary was merely the latest example: grand claims masking thin delivery. But that complacency is catching up with them. When every initiative is sold as a moral crusade, even a small misstep becomes a crisis of credibility.
Political crossfire
The real tragedy is that Ukrainian refugees are now caught in the political crossfire. Will the Welsh Government learn from this? Unlikely. The instinct to differentiate for its own sake is too deeply embedded in the political ecosystem, a culture that prizes theatre over results and validation within the bubble over credibility beyond it. Surrounded by the same advisers, lobbyists and commentators who reward moral signalling, ministers and Members alike have come to mistake approval inside their circle for trust outside it.
After a quarter of a century in charge, Wales’s political establishment has run out of excuses. The Nation of Sanctuary was meant to celebrate Welsh compassion; it now stands as proof of something else – that when politics becomes a performance, even good intentions end in failure.
David Taylor is a former Welsh Labour special adviser
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Look how others have supported Ukraine:
Ministry of Justice has held workshops with their Ukrainian counterparts.
Europe changed the routing of its transport network with Rail Baltica route changed from linking to Russian networks to linking to Ukrainian rail network.
What Ukraine will need after the war is skilled labour / opportunities for trade / new Universities etc.
Senedd could now fund say 100 Ukrainians to train to be engineers at University of South Wales – then get the University to open a campus in Ukraine.
They already have universities of their own, why would they want a branch campus of the University of South Wales? Unless this is satire.
Royalties tonkeep the uni open?
Spot on. Virtue signalling has long since taken over and not limited to this issue either.
“With Reform seemingly on course for victory in the Caerphilly by-election”….for the record the only polling available puts Plaid ahead of Reform for this by-election.
Nonsense
Not this morning. If anyone is looking for a reason why Reform are on the rise, this article explains it. The self absorbed Bay bubble devotes itself to pious virtue, whilst ordinary citizens can’t get a GP or dental appointment, decent education for their kids, jobs, transport and housing. Rocket science not required to identify the outcome.
This is a mich bigger problem. The whole of the UK has a long history of government by ideology rather than government by what works. Listen to the cries of “but I don’t know what he stands for” from an electorate hooked on cult leaders since Thatcher. Listen to the left-left ushering in a fascist government rather than “compromising their values”.
Are the left left in the room with you now?
The left-left don’t like dealing with reality.
Who are these left left you keep fantasising about?
That was the argument the right of Labour kept saying before the last election. Vote for us or get the tories again.
Well guess what we got the tory tribute act anyway. Starner and his neoliberal conmen are further right than most sensible tories.
Would you support a centrist government if the alternative was a fascist one?
The left-left don’t understand that we don’t have the luxury of voting for who we want. Without a preference voting system we can only vote against who we don’t want. The right have milked this ignorance for a century. And even when we were offered preference voting in 2011, the left-left said no thanks.
It’s right up there with the Future Generations legislation. Virtue signalling, loved by bureaucrats, but essentially pointless
What are you talking about? Plaid is on course for victory in this by-election.
This is spot on once again, David
>>>Rather than making a straightforward case for supporting Ukraine, ministers tried to turn the programme into a statement of Welsh moral leadership. A practical humanitarian commitment was wrapped in sweeping rhetoric about Wales as a “sanctuary” for all refugees and asylum seekers, implying a compassion that set it apart from Westminster.
Is the author trying to say that Ukrainians are the ‘good’ refugees who should be welcomed while tacitly suggesting that others should be kept out? What exactly is different about Ukrainians compared to refugees from the other conflict zones around the world?
That isn’t about judging who are the “good” or “bad” refugees; it’s about aligning with the UK’s agreed humanitarian priorities. Both government policy and, I think, the majority of public opinion recognise that Ukraine is a special case – a large-scale European war with direct security implications for Britain. I don’t think that’s a particularly controversial view.
It depends on whether you want a Senedd that is aligned with Westminster priorities and stays in its box.
I want a Senedd aligned with the people’s priorities.
£55m spent on anything by a very very poor nation is quite a sum. Help people, of course, but set a reasonable budget, stick to it, and, as you say, do it properly. That really is a huge amount.
Unfortunately it is symptomatic of the profligate waste of tax-payers’ money that goes on through all layers of government (UK, Wales & local) and all corners of the public sector. They don’t care how much they spend because, when they run out, they just come back and take more from us.
Didn’t most of the money come from central government for the purpose of hosting Ukrainians?
“Caerphilly, Think Twice” *They say Reform is rising. But we remember the fall.* The valleys were starved— not by accident, but by design. Thatcher didn’t just close pits— she closed pantries, broke backs, and left Welsh families to choose between heat and dignity. The miners stood firm. The children went hungry. And now, decades on, some cheer for the same right-wing echo wrapped in louder slogans and Union Jack bravado. But shouting isn’t solidarity. And scapegoats aren’t solutions. Reform UK? It’s Thatcherism with a fresh coat of paint. It’s suspicion dressed as strength. It’s the same contempt for the working… Read more »
….That was then. This is now!
Mark Drakeford tells heartwarming story that sums up his ambition for Wales as a
‘Nation of Sanctuary’
27 Feb 2022 Nation.Cymru…
3 days after the invasion…quick thinking !