Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

Plaid Cymru once opposed arms fairs. Now it is helping organise one.

07 Aug 2026 5 minute read
A General Dynamics UK Ajax armoured fighting vehicle (behind) and a DCE (Digital Concepts Engineering) X series all-terrain unmanned ground vehicle.Photo Andrew Matthews PA Images

Adam Johannes⁩

In 2018, Plaid Cymru stood alongside campaigners who forced an arms fair out of Cardiff. Today, a Plaid Cymru-led Welsh Government is helping organise one.

That contradiction lies at the heart of the controversy surrounding the Defence Security Resilience Cymru summit – an event campaigners have dubbed, “The Welsh Government Arms Fair” – taking place on September 3 and 4 at the International Convention Centre at Celtic Manor in Newport.

Anti-war and anti-arms trade groups are calling on the Welsh Government to cancel the event.

This is not only about one event, but the gap between Plaid’s rhetoric in opposition and its decisions in government.

In 2018, I was arrested, handcuffed and detained in a police cell for 12 hours while peacefully protesting the Cardiff Arms Fair, an event that we successfully drove out of our city.

At the time, Plaid Cymru said it stood with campaigners like me challenging the global arms trade.

Plaid MPs condemned the event in Parliament, tabling an Early Day Motion that referred to the Defence Procurement, Research, Technology and Exportability (DPRTE) exhibition as the “Cardiff Arms Fair”. The motion expressed “disdain” for an event connecting government departments with “weapons dealers and suppliers” and criticised the British arms trade for fuelling conflicts that caused “significant civilian suffering from Gaza to Yemen”.

Leanne Wood, Plaid Cymru’s former leader, challenged Welsh Labour’s Ken Skates over his involvement, asking how support for what she called a “bazaar of brutality” could be compatible with Wales’s human rights obligations.

Heledd Fychan, now a Welsh Government minister, was also a vocal critic of the previous Welsh Government’s involvement in the DSEI arms fair in London, describing it as a “contemptible event”.

Only last year, Rhun ap Iorwerth criticised Eluned Morgan’s Labour administration for giving £500,000 of Welsh public money to an arms company whose products may have been used by Israel against Palestinian people. He called the decision “shocking and shameful”.

But now Plaid Cymru is in government, and the position has changed. Welsh public money is being used to co-organise an event involving General Dynamics, a major arms company connected to Israel’s military supply chain, while BAE Systems, another major arms manufacturer supplying Israel, will be exhibiting.

What changed? Did the weapons become less deadly? Did the suffering caused by war become less important? Or did political power make it easier to abandon principles that once appeared non-negotiable?

Arms Fair?

Some may question describing the summit as an ‘arms fair’. But this is the same term Plaid Cymru itself has used when opposing similar events

The organisers state that the summit will bring together more than 2,000 attendees and over 60 exhibitors to “connect buyers, suppliers and innovators across defence, security and national resilience”. They say the purpose is to help businesses gain a “competitive advantage” by entering defence supply chains and benefiting from increased UK military spending.

That is precisely what arms fairs do. They bring together governments, military institutions, weapons manufacturers and suppliers in order to expand arms production and sales.

The Welsh Government is co-organising the summit with Business in Focus, ADS Group and General Dynamics Land Systems.

ADS Group has been described by Campaign Against Arms Trade as the trade body for the UK arms industry, representing major weapons companies and promoting the interests of arms manufacturers.

General Dynamics Land Systems is a subsidiary of General Dynamics, one of the world’s largest arms companies. General Dynamics has supplied weapons to the Israeli military during what First Minister Rhun ap Iorwerth has described as a genocide in Gaza. It has also supplied arms to authoritarian governments including Saudi Arabia.

By partnering with major arms suppliers to Israel, the Welsh Government risks contradicting Plaid Cymru’s own 2024 conference vote in favour of boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, including an arms embargo.

Military Expansion

But the issue goes beyond individual companies. It is about what kind of economy Wales should build.

The summit aligns Wales with the UK Government’s programme of military expansion and a wider global arms race. Across Europe, dramatic increases to military spending is being funded through deep cuts to public spending. Rearmament has consequences, and those consequences are being felt by ordinary people through austerity.

The Welsh Government argues that expanding the arms industry will create jobs. But research by the Transition Security Project suggests that while increased UK military spending will create some employment, funding it through cuts to other areas of public spending will result in nearly twice as many job losses overall.

Wales already has the highest unemployment rate of any UK nation. The skills of our engineers, technicians, scientists and workers should be directed towards socially useful production in areas such as renewable energy, public transport, affordable housing and rebuilding our public services.

Every pound diverted into excessive military spending is a pound not invested in tackling the real crises facing Wales, from climate change and poverty to the shortage of affordable housing and pressure on public services.

Wales also has the highest poverty rate in the UK. A government that claims to stand for social justice should stand for welfare, not warfare.

If the Welsh Government proceeds, the anti-war movement will organise a mass demonstration outside the summit on its opening morning. The message will be clear: Stop the Welsh Government Arms Fair.

If Plaid ministers are prepared to put their names to the arms trade, those opposed must make their opposition impossible to ignore.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Chris Hale
Chris Hale
22 days ago

The Ajax fighting vehicle will be the one that has cost £5 billion, is currently 8 years late, and is not in service due to the prototypes making soldiers ill due to fumes and vibration?

Paul J
Paul J
22 days ago
Reply to  Chris Hale

uk government paid a premium for the company to set up a facility in wales. It would be interesting to get a cost benefit analysis to work out if buying leopards from germany and saving 2bn would have been a better use of public money

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
22 days ago

Bitterly disappointed in Plaid for this, to put it mildly. Abandoning your morals once you get into power is shameful. I’m generally a big fan of Plaid and have voted for them regularly. This is a critical issue though. If you can turn a blind eye and support organisations that are known to be involved in supplying arms to Israel as they continue to commit genocide, then you have lost your credibility and your humanity. Take a long hard look at yourselves and stand above the rest Plaid. Do not emulate the actions of the majority of other parties in… Read more »

Amir
Amir
22 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

Totally agree. Why are PC willing to have any association with a company that has a zero moral compass selling arms to an evil zionist regime or a brutal authoritarian Arab regime hell bent on beheading anyone who dares criticise them?

Dom
Dom
22 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

Where are you on supporting Ukraine to resist Russian aggression? It’s all good as long as it’s someone else helping them?

Amir
Amir
21 days ago
Reply to  Dom

Where are you on cutting funding to the NHS, health and social care? All so that some immoral individuals can rake in more millions. Arms are only required for as much as needed for effective defence. Selling it on to countries with no morality shows the stupidity of these companies.

Sam
Sam
21 days ago
Reply to  Amir

Ukraine is fighting for its life. I’d hardly say it has no morality. The defence sector is worth billions and creates jobs. We don’t have to sell to dictatorships etc but there is no reason not to sell our expertise to others. In many instances we are helping people fighting for their freedom. Eg Ukraine.

Amir
Amir
21 days ago
Reply to  Sam

How can anyone with a functioning brain equate Ukraine with an evil zionist regime and a brutal authoritarian Arab one?

Rob
Rob
21 days ago
Reply to  Amir

But that was Sam’s point. I don’t think he was defending Israel. Ukraine and Israel are very different conflicts. I support Ukraine, but not Israel.

Amir
Amir
21 days ago
Reply to  Rob

My initial comment never mentioned Ukraine. You did.

Dom
Dom
21 days ago
Reply to  Amir

“only required for as much as needed for effective defence”

No disagreement there, but that’s not possible without a defence industry.

Amir
Amir
21 days ago
Reply to  Dom

An industry that still requires a moral compass.

Dom
Dom
21 days ago
Reply to  Amir

No industry or business has a moral compass. It’s up to government to regulate and restrict exports.

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
21 days ago
Reply to  Dom

Which is what Plaid should surely be advocating for? I support Ukraine defending itself as well, but these companies are also supporting genocide and need to be held to account.

Amir
Amir
21 days ago
Reply to  Dom

I agree. That is why this fair shouldn’t happen until our government has restricted their exports and ensured regulations

Dom
Dom
21 days ago
Reply to  Amir

That’s backwards because you can’t restrict what doesn’t exist.

DarkMrakeford
DarkMrakeford
22 days ago

I suppose the only outcome to sticking to their principles is being labelled Kremlin agents in McCarthyism style by the Unionist parties who, in junction with the media, won’t have any dissent or nuance over the role of the military industrial complex and British foreign interventionism.

Last edited 22 days ago by DarkMrakeford
Michael F
Michael F
22 days ago
Reply to  DarkMrakeford

No. It’s being labelled as fools.

Lyn E
Lyn E
22 days ago

Plaid Cymru seems set on disillusioning those who voted for it in the belief that it was more progressive than Welsh Labour.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
22 days ago
Reply to  Lyn E

Janus faced…

Michael F
Michael F
22 days ago

The UK defence industry is worth over 36bn. Are we saying that we don’t want a slice of that in terms of jobs, investment etc? Our economy is one of the poorest in the UK, we can’t afford to have these odd ‘principles’. WG ministers should be all over this conference, persuading companies to come to Wales, crest jobs etc

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
22 days ago
Reply to  Michael F

I’d rather we had morals, integrity and a positive reputation throughout the world than blood tainted money personally.

Gethin
Gethin
22 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

So, happy to leave us open to invasion, smaller things such as our cables being cut at sea, economy paralysed etc. Got ya.

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
21 days ago
Reply to  Gethin

I’m not saying not to have any sort of defence industry. I’m stating that these companies are supporting genocide. Surely you’re against that?? Having a defence industry shouldn’t mean having zero morals.

Sam
Sam
2 hours ago
Reply to  Gethin

what does our cables being cut have to do with our country deciding that it will be the host of a morally bankrupt industry that kills and displaces millions around the world? we don’t want wales being used as a base for US and westminster imperial ambitions, but the fact that you support that idea says a lot about you and your morality. you want wales to be a country known for being a hub for the military industrial complex where war criminal arms manufacturers can pitch up and sell weapons on behalf of murderous regimes like america and israel

Cai Wogan Jones
Cai Wogan Jones
22 days ago

Has the author of this piece noticed the developments in international affairs over the last 5 years, including a major war of aggression on our continent with signs that it is spreading? Does he support military defence? If so, that obviously requires arms production.

The enduring ethical issue is the destination and purpose of arms sales.

Sam
Sam
1 hour ago

£7000 from israel coming your way for that post

Hefin
Hefin
22 days ago

So the author would stop us sending arms to Ukraine to help them in their existential struggle against oppression? Or stop an independent Wales from having a military to protect itself, its airspace, its seas etc? The first role of any government is to defend its people. If an independent Wales means no defence, no military etc to protect its people then count me out. Oh and I’m not sure that boasting about losing a money spinning defence fair from Cardiff to Birmingham is something to be proud of. Massive loss of income for local venues, hotels, restaurants etc.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
22 days ago
Reply to  Hefin

Defend its land…Does that include Wildfires started by thoughtless people thanks to thoughtless lazy ex-solicitor politicians in our Senedd not passing simple laws banning the sale BBQ firelighters…!

Gethin
Gethin
22 days ago
Reply to  Hefin

Middle class bourgeois professional protesters are all the same – not a single thought about the working class people affected by their actions.

Amir
Amir
21 days ago
Reply to  Gethin

Really? Are you done shedding a fake tear for the multi millionaires buffoons at the top of these war mongering weapon manufacturers who seem to be sponsoring the down votes in these comments? I know who really looks out for the working classes and it is definitely not these fat CEOs.

Rob
Rob
21 days ago

The world has changed a lot since 2018. We now have two authoritarian leaders threatening European sovereignty: Putin, who has already invaded a sovereign country, and Trump, who has openly talked about annexing the territory of a NATO ally. Both have a combined nuclear arsenal that could wipe out humanity, so pretending that Europe’s security environment is unchanged from a decade ago simply is not credible. I completely oppose arms sales to Israel and I welcome Plaid’s stance on Gaza. But Ukraine is a very different situation. They got invaded and are fighting for their very existence. Europe needs to… Read more »

CymroDownUnder
CymroDownUnder
21 days ago
Reply to  Rob

Well put

Fish Face
Fish Face
4 days ago
Reply to  CymroDownUnder

Funny how we always call it defense when there’s only 22 countries in the world that the UK has never invaded. Violence breeds violence and working class people always end up paying for it. The real war we should be fighting is climate change and nature degradation, which is a fight against billionaires not other countries and it doesn’t involve guns just common sense.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.