Plaid Should Go It Alone

Ben Wildsmith
The shifting sands of UK politics feel less stable than ever before. It can feel slightly surreal watching the Conservative Party thrashing around in irrelevance, hoping that we’ll take notice.
This is the political entity that has set the weather on these islands for as long as we’ve been alive, and before that too. Seizures of power by the Liberals and Labour have been notable because, in the main, the Tories have held sway, embodying an Anglo-centric worldview that could be relied upon to come good under our perverse, nebulous constitution.
The periods when it has been out of power have, largely, coincided with adverse enough conditions as to make power an unattractive proposition. The party remained in opposition, however, a sort of default, to which the country would inevitably revert.
Dead parrot
That’s history now. Jake Berry’s defection today to Reform UK is likely the first of several recognisable figures. The Tory Party, astonishing as it seems, is a dead parrot. The question that remains, is what will happen to Labour?
The febrile and atomised nature of politics these days does not lend itself to a consensus position. Labour’s strategy at last year’s election was to squat over the disinterested centre of UK opinion like an inert toad, croaking inoffensively and promising not to jump left. Such a position can work in politics.
Eisenhower’s terms as US President were distinguished by his reluctance to interfere in the workings of a nation that was flourishing.
The UK, though, is far from flourishing. Stalled growth, crumbling services, and a widespread distrust of institutions mean that a hands-off approach to government isn’t an option.
The party’s offer in 2024 was so broad and vague that satisfying its voters has become an impossibility. It’s one thing launching your General Election campaign in Kent and appealing overtly to the Conservative heartlands, quite another when you have to explain your Osbornesque cuts to the welfare state in Tonypandy.
Insincere
In attempting to be neither fish nor fowl, Starmer’s party has looked insincere, unprincipled, divided, and incompetent. With every U-turn, the whiff of despair rises from it.
It’s abundantly clear that Starmer’s team have written off the Senedd election next year. Every ounce of their political ballast is being expended to shore up English votes against the rise of Reform UK.
The PM’s bizarre claim that Plaid Cymru would attempt to govern Wales with the Tories and Reform betrays the total ignorance and lack of interest that he and his team have in the election.
To counter Plaid effectively, Labour would need to pivot leftwards, at least on matters pertaining to Wales alone. That they aren’t doing this speaks of the Welsh branch of the party being abandoned as collateral damage in the wider battle against Nigel Farage.
Given that ‘Welsh Labour’ can’t so much as order a ream of paper without financial clearance from the UK party, you must wonder what resources will be put at its disposal next year. Beyond that, will its campaign engage meaningfully with Plaid at all, or will funds be dependent on pushing the wider message against Reform?
Potential collapse
In circumstances like these, I suggest that Plaid Cymru needs to reassess its position in light of a potential collapse of the Labour vote. Most polls currently have Reform leading, with Plaid in second place and Labour third. They also show that Labour is leaking to Plaid more than it is to Reform, and that Welsh satisfaction with Keir Starmer as PM is historically low.
All of this is nearly a year out from the election, before most candidates have been adopted. When the mass of the electorate wakes up to politics shortly before the election it will be faced with a new reality: that Labour can’t win. The huge, flabby, disinterested vote that Labour has enjoyed for a century will find out that the battle is between Plaid and Reform. Who wants to back a tied-on loser?
In parallel to this, the travails and mishaps of the UK government will continue against an impossible financial position and the uncertainty of world affairs. There is nothing on the horizon that suggests Labour will have any easy wins at all during this parliament. For every populist bone it throws at potential Reform voters in England, it will make the party’s job harder here.
There is a case for Plaid to rule out any form of governing arrangement with Labour, including confidence and supply. The centre of the pitch is being cleared, first of Conservatives, and then the current iteration of Labour. What’s to come will not be a compromise, a consensus, or a fudge, because the electorate refuse that train of thought.
Dysfunction
A battle for the soul of the UK is underway and if Wales is to emerge with a future, then the party claiming it must do so unashamedly and alone. There will be three years of the UK parliament to run after the Senedd election. The dysfunction and calamity that these will likely bring should spook us all.
From reckless militarism to cruel economic choices, Starmer’s government promises the opposite of the ’Red Welsh Way’ that its Senedd supplicants have recently touted.
Plaid Cymru as a party, and Cymru as a nation can distance ourselves from all that next year. We should be grateful and proceed accordingly.
Governing as a minority, Plaid can use the threat of Reform to shame the rump of Labour and any Lib-Dems or Greens to fall into line and vote for their programme. If, instead, the party relies on Labour as an elder sibling, justified complaints about the Senedd being too cosy will attach to it with predictable results. Time to be brave.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Think that’s the sensible approach.
Alex Salmond governed Scotland very capably as a minority Government initially, so there’s a clear precedent if Plaid get in enough candidates with the required competency.
If seems the be the key word with closed party lists. Perfect for insiders to get chosen
Competency would have been best served with an open list (where the voters choose whom to vote each candidate on the voting slip possibly for different parties).
I think Plaid could. They have Anna Brycha.n covering Penarth and she is well able to fit any education role.
Spot on. Plaid would be foolish to go in (again) with Labour. The only problem is that a minority Government would be completely ignored by Westminster. The current devolution model simply doesn’t work.
The latter is a challenge, I remember a Scottish politician saying westminster (civil service and politicians)largely has a ‘devolve and forget’ mentality. This became much more prominent under the SNP. I don’t think ignored is the right word, but it can certainly lead to policy misalignment
How do they deal with this in federal states like Australia?
Can I add to your last sentence. The current devolution model simply doesn’t work for Cymru, it is perfect for Westminster, when they can classify spending in England as “England and Wales” and skew the system meant to give us money through the Barnett formula. When infrastructure building is outside our borders, and they can claim it is for us, we may as well be ruled from Mongolia, for all the good it does us.
I generally agree. But would say “for and within Cymru”. Some/many will disagree; but I see no realistic possibility of independence or a return to Westminster rule in the short to medium term. Nor do I see any change to the Barnett formula. Westminster won’t want overall spending to increase and the Scots won’t accept a reduction in their share. Thus we will have to make better use of what we’ve got and for me that involves a sharp reduction in the number of local authorities; but more fiscal and policy autonomy for them. Centralised rule from Cardiff Bay simply… Read more »
Governance isn’t a light switch. It’s not about working or not working, it’s about better or worse than the alternative. The current model of devolution is better than what came before but worse than alternatives such as a federal model that is proven in more successful economies like the US, Australia and Germany.
I agree on the federalism point; but it’s not about governance. That over used concept isn’t a means to an end of itself. Rather it’s about positive impact on the lives of people. No one can seriously argue that the current model is delivering much of that. If it was, we wouldn’t have Farage & co riding high in the polls for a start. If it’s not working, change it.
What’s not working most is central government. Start by fixing that anachronism.
I agree; but I assume your reference to central government is limited to Westminster? Cardiff Bay is no better. All we’ve done is swap one command and control model for another.
There’s a view that Cardiff Bay is too ready to use Westminster as a template for what a good government should look like, that’s true. But you solve that by improving central government, raise that low bar and Cardiff Bay will follow suit.
I feel sorry for Eluned Morgan, I think she is well-meaning but she is saddled with her loyalty to English Labour. She makes a few noises in the right direction, such as pointing out the situation with the Crown Estate, but that is not enough. Welsh Labour needs at least to split completely from English labour, and ideally come out in favour of Welsh independence. I would love to see the Labour Senedd members resign the party and join Plaid Cymru.
Personally I feel that Labour has left Eluned and she should jump ship to Plaid Cymru as you suggest. I think she’s been fighting hard for Wales much to the disgruntlement of Labour MPs and Westminster and some in her own party.
English Labour, Welsh Labour? They are all the same Labour Party, unionists to their very core. The Labour Party have suffocated the valleys for the last 100 years with their self-serving corrupt ways. Plaid is the only alternative in the 2026 Senedd elections.
This might sound a bit out of left field, but shouldn’t the decision to support ‘going it alone’ be made only after seeing a credible plan for government? When it comes to the NHS, education, and economic growth, are there any confirmed policy proposals or initiatives in place yet? Especially given the context of expected real-terms budget cuts in the next senedd term
That is a big part of the problem confronting the electorate. Plaid are also guilty of making grand pronouncements without any clearly defined pathways or funding plans. They can howl away at Reform’s lack of defined vision, which anyone with a brain cell can do, but they have occupied space within Y Senedd far longer and are yet to roll out a substantial set of propositions.
It is odd how so many people criticise reform for lack of vision or Welsh specific policies yet their own sides don’t have any either.
Last time around many of the commitments simply weren’t credible.
The lesson from 2016 is that voters prefer delusions and fairytales to genuine honest proposals that can be twisted and distorted by those peddling delusions and fairytales. So who is really to blame?
When I put my local MP on the spot about this i.e. why weren’t they honest about the UK finances and sacrifices or tax rises needed pre election, he said nobody would have voted for them if they were. The lack of honesty from all parties and relaism by the electorate is probably a large reason labour are in the mess they’re in at Westminster
People want more involvement in their own governance, which is a good thing, but they aren’t yet prepared to put in the hard yards to be properly informed.
They want the power of direct democracy but the responsibility of representative democracy.
My view is we should have more referendums that genuinely represent the complexities and hard realities with no easy choices on offer.
We were treated like children with the 2016 vote that assumed no-one could cope with more than two options, it’s time to treat the electorate like adults.
“Credible plan for government”, sir no plan survives first contact with reality. This is just a soundbite that sounds well meaning, but in reality only serves one agenda, London’s. As the SNP found out, no plan can in reality, be made until independence is chosen and declared. It will then be for the electorate to decide who to elect to government. It’s how it works and each item will be decided on a case by case basis according to the democratic mandate. If you don’t like their manifesto, their record, you don’t have to vote for them you can vote… Read more »
I would think that anyone voting for Plaid vote for that party only and not for a Plaid/Labour party. If any party combine with another surely that is going against the wishes of the people who voted for them!
What’s worse, having your choice of party half in government delivering half of what they promised you, or having a party you really don’t want in power?
There is definitely a place for coalition and cooperation in democracies, but in a case where the coalition partner is likely the unpopular, long-serving incumbent, it definitely is a ball-and-chain
‘Labour’s strategy at last year’s election was to squat over the disinterested centre of UK opinion like an inert toad, croaking inoffensively and promising not to jump left.’
That’s also the most vivid – and, I’d say, pretty spot-on – simile for this Westminster government’s political stance over the last year that I’ve seen!
Excellent article Ben! Plaid must distance itself from Labour. At Cardiff and London levels they are a busted flush. At the 2026 Senedd Election the choice will be between a party rooted in our nation, offering a Cymru-focussed manifesto, or a party (or is it a limited company?) who regard Wales as a soppy enclave and simply see next year’s Election as a springboard for the 2029 UK Election, where that nice Mr Farage could become PM of the British State. How our people respond in the next few months will have monumental and existential significance.
Ben, I hope you’re right but I doubt Plaid will be anywhere near being able to govern on their own. Unfortunately, many in Plaid and their supporters appear to be suffering from the same hubris that they had in the run up to the last election with embarrassing talk of Adam Price being nailed on to be the next FM.
Presumably the die is cast by the initial vote to select an FM, not by wishful thinking.
It’s always confidence and supply. That’s how the Senedd and Parliament functions. “We like what’s on offer so we’re going to vote for it.”… or they don’t vote for it. At the moment, if anything, MSs and MPs have far too much direction to do their own thing and should instead listen and take the lead from their constituents. This applies to Plaid Cymru, it should listen to its member-base. Labour (Welsh Labour) has a lot in common with Plaid Cymru and it would not be out of place to have a deal. I personally don’t see why this arrangement… Read more »