Plastic Labour

Ben Wildsmith
We frequently hear complaints about the ‘footballification’ of politics. The argument is that party politics have become some tribal as to preclude rational debate; politicians blindly follow their party line without considering its merits. I think the analogy goes further than that.
One of the reasons that top-level football leaves me cold is that players rarely have a genuine connection to clubs. As hired guns, they are loyal to whoever is paying their wages and have not usually lived anywhere near the communities from which their fans are drawn.
Today’s politics sees a similar phenomenon. As voters in Cardiff and Swansea have recently discovered, parties don’t require their favoured candidates to have any local knowledge of their proposed constituencies. Their bona fides derive from party officials rather than the communities they hope to represent.
Beyond that, though, the emergence of a professional political class has gifted us politicians whose guiding principles are careerist rather than political.
Freshers week
In the mushy, nondescript centre of UK politics, pliable middle-management type MPs seem connected to their parties by nothing more than a vague social association forged during freshers’ week.
The political philosophy, history, and culture of parties seem to be receding into irrelevance as the traditional outfits compete as rival management companies, leaving ideology to the populists.
Against that backdrop we learned this week that Homelessness Minister, Rushanara Ali, had removed four tenants from her £900 000 property before relisting it with the rent jacked up by £700.
I’m not going to insult your intelligence by pointing out the problems with that, they are bleedin’ obvious. I also understand that the minister claims various nuances to the story have been unreported.
Let’s turn, instead, to Rachel Reeves’ defence of Ali when the Conservatives inevitably called for her resignation. Instead of elucidating those supposed nuances, or pointing to work the minister has done, Reeves claimed she ‘didn’t understand’ the calls, as Ali had acted within the law.
Depressing
There are two possibilities here, and I’m caught as to which is the more depressing. Either Reeves was responding with dumb insolence, disingenuously failing to see an ethical problem where everybody else can, or she genuinely believes that if an action is technically legal then it has no ethical implications for the minister involved.
In this case, that would mean that Tory-authored rental legislation, drafted over decades to advantage landlords over tenants, is the only ethical consideration that a Labour homelessness minister should consider when conducting her private business.
Reeves is the perfect example of a politician who could sit in either major party without changing any of her positions. From winter fuel payments, to disability benefits, refusing a wealth tax and insisting on her predecessor’s fiscal rules, the Chancellor’s instincts would offend absolutely nobody in the party opposite her.
When she says she ‘doesn’t understand’ the problem with Rushanara Ali’s conduct, I’m inclined to believe her.
Childish pettiness
Meanwhile, her nemesis in Labour, and the frontbencher who is supposed to embody traditional Labour values, Angela Rayner, was in the news this week for encouraging councils to sell off their allotments.
Having had some experience of the childish pettiness at the top of Labour politics, I couldn’t rule out this being an attempt at trolling the nation’s most famous allotmenteer, Jeremy Corbyn. Whatever the motive, however, it betrays a staggering cluelessness about the soul of the party she represents.
Allotments are the living, photosynthesising embodiment of Labour values: modest, decent, communal spaces where ordinary people can grow healthy food for themselves and others.
They are, it is fair to say, the cultural opposite of knocking around on yachts with Jeffrey Epstein.
Paging Lord Mandelson.
Voting for Labour nowadays is like driving one of those Chinese-made MGs. The only item left from the original is the badge, and on closer inspection, it’s plastic.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


From even before the parliamentary elections, when no one from the Labour Party would make any mention of introducing a wealth tax, I knew this Party was lost.
The rot in Labour started a lot earlier, with the abandonment of Clause 4 during the Blair years.
“Voting for Labour nowadays is like driving one of those Chinese-made MGs. The only item left from the original is the badge, and on closer inspection, it’s plastic.”
Very true Labour carries the name but not the Red Wall.
Looks like new Labour is well and truly in control.
New Labour carried the Red Wall and a good deal of middle UK. Their legacy is dreadful though giving away our gold was one of their least concerning legacies.
Excellent article highlighting why there is a growing distrust in politicians. In the old days, they used to be criticised for abandoning their principles. These days, they don’t have any, and neither do their parties.
Is this new? I think it can be traced back at least 20 or 30 years, to the time of Blair, Mandleson and the “New Labour” project.
No, it started with Thatcher.
Perfectly expressed Ben! As a former proud allotmenteer, now too old to bend, can I confirm your thesis. If Labour loses the allotments, it loses its soul and becomes the party of the big Mac and KFC
I’ve ‘up-ticked’ your post because it’s so obviously ‘on the nail’. Like you, I’ve grown my own veg. for decades until two summers ago when old age’s infirmities finally made it impractical.
But I do have some sympathy for local authorities, who over the last decade and a half have been so starved of revenue that they may well find flogging allotment sites off for a tidy sum to developers bent on building properties whose occupants will pay council tax distinctly tempting.
Typical politician, hypocritical duplicitous self serving, their only regret is that they are caught. She should resign without delay. Having said this, anyone providing a property to anyone else these days has to tread very carefully, which is why so many are walking away to leave the corporate giants take over. The councils are going to be too skint to help considering the deluge of demands on all their services. So all this causes a massive supply / demand problem that forces up rents, where Ali realised her property was £700 below where the market value is. But to avoid… Read more »
Labelling all politicians as equally corrupt and untrustworthy is a favourite trope of the right-wing; they know very well that the cynicism thus engendered plays right into their hands.This could well lead to a Reform government, and if you think things can’t get any worse you will be in for a shock if that lot get into power.
The hypocrisy of UK Labour knows no bounds. Homeless Minister who effectively evicts her tenants with the intent of selling her property only for it to conveniently not sell enabling her to increase the rent by £700 where before she couldn’t as the tents had a legally binding contract. She’s morally corrupt and deserved to go. If the house genuinely didn’t sell why then didn’t she contact her tenants and offer them back the property. She didn’t. It’s not like she’s on the breadline. This stinks to holy hell. Champagne socialist. Red Tory same old story.
No no this is left wing Labour not red Tory.
Don’t know what planet you live on but anyone with common sense will tell you that Starmers Labour Party and the Tories are just 2 cheeks of the same backside.
This is not left wing Labour. That option is no longer available since Starmer purged the left.
‘Against that backdrop we learned this week that Homelessness Minister, Rushanara Ali, had removed four tenants from her £900 000 property before relisting it with the rent jacked up by £700.’ On the whole I’m disinclined to cut much slack to our current bunch of MPs because across the last few years we’ve seen ample evidence that rather a lot of them don’t deserve it! But I hesitate just a little in this particular case, because I happened to be listening this morning to James O’Brien’s talk show on LBC when he picked up on this story and delved into… Read more »
While switching off my lap-top, I spotted that Ms Ali has apparently resigned her ministerial post this evening.
Which, I guess, settles the matter. Maybe it’s for the best.
An individual resignation does not settle the matter. As the excellent article highlights, there is clearly something wrong with a party that has abandoned its basic principles of fairness and equity, and support for those less well off.
You might have a point. It’s a mere suspicion on my part and nothing more, but I do suspect that Labour under Starmer’s leadership has become unnerved by the popular lurch to the hard right which Reform UK’s recent support in opinion polls suggests.
As I make abundantly clear before pivoting to Reeves.
It was the hypocrisy and duplicity that was wrong, for which she has rightly resigned. Asking the market rent for a property is the same as an employee asking their boss to match what other employers are paying. The irony is that skewed politics from the left is forcing the rents up across the board with small property owners being replaced by corporate tower blocks. I trust that adequate coverage will also be provided for the Len McCloskey scandal while he was championing Jeremy Corbyn to his catastrophic time in charge of Labour. Unite are lumbered with a property worth… Read more »
So left-wing policies are responsible for the housing crisis? Seriously? The world turned upside-down indeed.
Didn’t James O’Brien also point out that the Rental Act that comes into effect next year will ban the practice of kicking your tenants out and then hiking the rent? I think he said it was banned for 6 months after the eviction.
On that basis, it came down to going against an Act that she helped push through.
He did indeed.
But Ms Ali’s defence would doubtless be that she only gave the tenants notice to quit because she’d decided on selling the property, and that she’d offered them double the time required under law to find themselves somewhere else.
And that she’d only put the property back on to the rental market – after the previous tenants had found other accommodation and moved out – because she’d been unable to find a buyer.
You might or might not believe that, but I think that proving it one way or another might be difficult.
Labour politicians should not be landlords, and landlords should not be Labour politicians.
I think that’s exactly the moral of this unfortunate saga – at the very least when the politician landlord also holds the job of being ‘homelessness minister’.
It will be interesting to see if politicians rental/second homes comes under more scrutiny before the next elections. Plaid won’t want to make it an election issue!
I like a lot of the points in this article. Particularly the one that Reeves’ could sit on either party without needing to change her policies. I was hopeful when they came into power but they’ve had less challenges than the previous administration and somehow managed to dig a deeper hole than when they started.
The allotment sell off (albeit in England) sets a worrying precedent. The government should be creating a fund for councils to use to buy land for new allotments given the amount of new housing estates being built with increasingly smaller outdoor spaces.
Oddly enough I heard statistics earlier today which indicated that there are more Labour MPs who, in their admission of outside interests, reveal that they’re landlords of rental properties than there are Tories or Lib Dems.
Though given how few Tories there now are in the Commons, maybe that should be no surprise.