Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

The future of farming in Wales is not vegan — and here’s why

16 Sep 2025 4 minute read
Beef cattle stock

Daniel James

Dr Carys Bennett’s recent article argues that animal agriculture must disappear from Wales and that the future is entirely vegan. While the piece raises concerns worth addressing, it collapses under the weight of over-simplification, selective evidence, and disregard for Wales’s land, culture, and economy.

A more realistic, balanced future is possible…but it is not vegan.

Bennett cites exposés of poor conditions as though they represent th§e norm. They don’t. The vast majority of Welsh farmers follow strict regulations on welfare, are inspected regularly, and work with vets and auditors. When “abuses” occur, the answer is stronger enforcement and transparency, not the abolition of farming altogether.

Much of Wales is steep, wet, acidic upland. This land cannot grow soy, cereals, or vegetables efficiently, but it can support grazing animals that turn inedible grass into high-quality protein. To demand vegan farming everywhere is to ignore the basic geography and soil science of our country. Removing animals from these landscapes would render vast areas agriculturally useless.

Caretakers

For centuries, Welsh farmers have been more than food producers; they have been caretakers of our landscapes. The hedgerows, stone walls, and patchwork fields that define Wales are the result of generations of livestock management. Remove animals, and the countryside doesn’t “rewild” into paradise — it grows over into scrubland, losing wildflowers, pollinators, and birdlife. Vegan ideology claims to protect nature while in reality, proposing to dismantle the very system that has maintained it.

Yes, livestock produce emissions. But permanent pastures also store carbon, protect soils, and support biodiversity. Replacing them wholesale with tree plantations or arable crops risks unintended consequences: wildfire risks, water mismanagement, and biodiversity loss. The future of climate policy isn’t about abolishing animals, it’s about smarter land management, mixed farming, and reduced waste.

The economics of abolishing animal agriculture in Wales are stark. Livestock accounts for a huge majority of Welsh agricultural output, particularly beef and lamb. Take that away, and thousands of farms become unviable overnight. Suggesting that all those farmers can simply pivot to vegetables or niche crops ignores reality. Wales does not have the fertile expanses of East Anglia. Force through veganism, and we won’t eat more “Welsh vegetables” — we’ll import food from overseas, often from countries with weaker welfare and higher emissions. That isn’t ethical; it’s outsourcing guilt.

Processed meats eaten in excess are harmful. But moderate consumption of meat and dairy, especially grass-fed, supplies nutrients (protein, B12, iron, calcium) that plant-based diets often require supplementation to replace. A “one-size-fits-all” vegan prescription ignores cultural realities and the needs of children, elderly people, and lower-income families. The vegan claim that supplements and imported substitutes are somehow more “natural” or “healthy” than local lamb or milk collapses on inspection.

Traditions

Farming is not just about food — it sustains rural economies, communities, and traditions. Livestock farming is woven into Welsh history and landscapes. Shutting it down would devastate rural Wales, depopulate villages, and erase a cultural identity. A transition must protect livelihoods, not destroy them.

This is the blind spot of vegan ideology: it reduces food to a moral checkbox, ignoring the people who produce it and the culture it sustains. Vegan campaigners may talk about compassion, but their vision is ruthlessly uncompassionate toward farming families, rural communities, and cultural heritage. The “vegan future” is a cultural erasure, replacing centuries of Welsh identity with imported soy patties and almond milk. That isn’t progress; it’s cultural vandalism.

The future of farming in Wales is not vegan, but it is changing. That future looks like…

High-welfare standards and stricter enforcement of regulations.

Agroecological systems where animals and crops support each other.

Diversification into horticulture, renewable energy, and rewilding where land is suitable.

Encouraging moderation, not elimination, in diets shifting from intensive, processed meats toward local, pasture-raised products.

This is how Wales can cut emissions, protect health, and safeguard its communities without indulging in the fantasy of a “vegan nation.”

Dr Bennett’s argument is not a roadmap for Welsh farming; it’s an ideology dressed up as inevitability. It dismisses the science of land capability, the culture of our rural communities, and the livelihoods of thousands of families who steward this landscape every day. Wales deserves thoughtful solutions rooted in evidence and practicality, not narrow, politically driven manifestos that ignore reality. The future of farming here will be built by farmers and communities working with nature… not dictated by campaign slogans and weak propaganda.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
smae
smae
2 months ago

The only slight, very slight criticism I have here is that the article seems to imply that it is ‘natural’. Farming is inherently, non natural, it’s man made. While the argument is made that ‘re-wilding’ often means simply growing over into scrubland… yes this is true, but left for long enough and with the right animal roaming around (boars, deer, goats?) without containment and the environment will eventually, over the years, return to how it should be. Humans are very much not needed when it comes to maintaining biodiversity, if anything it is humans destroying biodiversity. While I don’t agree… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  smae

Livestock farming IS inherently natural. Has been since humans settled in Wales during neolithic times. It’s also the case that many other species besides humans are farmers. Reason why bees make honey for winter sustenance and also the reason beavers ‘crop’ their settlement, just two examples. A mention of goat as a wild species is interesting. Their natural behaviour is to heft, the process of deliberately browse pasture and scrub within a claimed herd footprint with the result of creating an ongoing habitat for their offspring. Same behavior in sheep. What is inherently unnatural is the application of fossil fuel-based… Read more »

smae
smae
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

livestock need to be fed and vaccinated, this is usually done with crops that have been treated and they typically take up more of said crops (drop in efficiency) that from eating the crops directly. To argue that human farming is like beavers managing water ways and woodlands or like bees is to miss the utter devastation on the landscape that farming in general has wrought. There is nothing ‘natural’ about man-made farming practices and it certainly doesn’t seek any kind of balance in nature that other animals strike, human’s are fairly unique in the ability to turn landscapes into… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  smae

Arable crops fed to livestock are the bits humans don’t eat like the straw of wheat and barley or where the protein content doesn’t reach human standards. If you are referring to silage, that’s just the cropping, rotation and storage of pasture. Vaccines used on livestock are of the benign strain variety. Very different from genetic modification used to grow intensively farmed vegetable crops. It is these than cause damage to the eco-system.

smae
smae
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

If you think GMO foods are not used to feed animals, you might want to double check your sources. Most of the livestock farmers near me use any grain or oats they can get their hands on and there’s at least one farmer who only supplies his crops to other farms for the purposes of animal feed (they’re not GMO fwiw, but I grab a sack of whatever is left over when the farmer has met their quota and I find it up to standard). My point about vaccines is that you implied that these animals are interference free and… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  smae

Growth hormones have been banned in Europe since 1981 and that ban still applies to the counties of the United Kingdom. Stop spreading lies. A farmer can get five times the price of oats sold to human consumption as that of animal feed so I find your claim hard to believe, however, near me in Carmarthenshire the cattle capital of the British Isles, the main gain supplement is draff and chaff, a mix using the spent gain from Felin Feol brewery. Also, bovine TB vaccination is given to wild badgers not cows.

smae
smae
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

Genetically Modified Organisms… does not equate to growth hormones. They are perfectly legal in the UK as long as they are appropriately labeled.

No one mentioned TB vaccinations? Or did you think cows only get one vaccination or something?

https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/vaccine-use-in-livestock

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  smae

Not to mention the spreading of toxic slurry on the land, the runoff into rivers, the poisoning of sheep farmers by organo-phosphate sheep dip, the spread of zoonotic diseases to humans (BSE, avian flu, salmonellosis and Covid 19; also ebola, currently in hot countries but who knows what will happen when the climate gets even hotter).

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  David J

There are no licences issued for land disposal of organo-phosphate sheep dip in Wales. Stop projecting practices in other countries onto Welsh farmers. As to cow poo being toxic, it isn’t. Vital fertilisation to the health of our soils. Only causes a problem if run-off in high concentrations. A Wales wide NVZ regime applies in Wales.

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

Then how to account for the several farmers I have met who are suffering exactly that poisoning? They are not poisoned from chemicals on the land, they are poisoned when they are dipping the sheep, obvs. And if you think cow poo isn’t toxic, try living next door to a dump site as I do, you might change your mind, especially if you bothered to find out what cows are being fed. Slurry gives off methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulphide, and carbon dioxide; all of which pollutes the air which we have to breath, and increases global heating.

smae
smae
2 months ago
Reply to  David J

Cow poop isn’t toxic… but boy does it smell bad lmao

smae
smae
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

Slurry. Farmers are well know for using sewage slurry otherwise known as sludge, produced from human sewage treatment plants and often contain toxic chemicals. 15th June 2025 BBC.

Paul
Paul
2 months ago
Reply to  David J

Your argument regarding slurry runoff is more to do with the effects of intensive farming rather than farming per se, intensive farming is the result of producing cheap food. The same as intensive horticulture. Perhaps seasonal food and less consumption would be a good compromise.

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  smae

Oh I forgot antibiotic resistance caused by over use of these on farm animals.

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  David J

Obviously anti-biotics are not used on organic livestock (15%) and in the remaining production anti-biotics resistance is low as the animals are killed for meat. This issue of resistance obviouly only only applies to common zoonic bacteria with humans.

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

Obviously organic farming does not involve the use of antibiotics, but these animals can still be infected by airborne or insect-borne pathogens, or by wild animals (badgers and TB for example). If you keep free-ranging animals in pens or overcrowded fields they could easily become infected without antibiotics . Your argument that ABR is low because the animals are killed for meat does not stand up; bacteria and viruses have the nasty habit of mutating very quickly, so there is plenty of time for them to become infected before slaughter and plenty of time for the pathogen to migrate. If… Read more »

CapM
CapM
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

Livestock farming is not’ inherently natural’. It was first developed about ten thousand ears ago. Modern humans emerged about three hundred thousand years ago so for the vast majority of our species existence we didn’t farm. The farming behaviour of a minute number of non human species is genetic and developed millions of years ago. Human farming behaviour is cultural and recent. The behaviour of for example leaf cutting ants is of no relevance to the types and scale of the farming undertaken by humans, whether it’s growing lettuce or ultimately producing T-bone steaks If you’re going to credit bees… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  CapM

There were two ‘vegan’ humanoid species in our evolution, both extinct. The key survival method of the ‘out of Africa’ migration of humans outside the tropics was eating meat, in all three human species, Denisovans, Sapiens and Neanderthals. The need to eat meat due to scarcity of food in the winter months of higher latitudes. You’re 8000 year concept of farming is also wrong. Only relates to arable farming. Animal husbandry is much older, as proven by trace lactose on storage vessels and the morphology of Auroch (bos primigenius) to early breeds of cattle, a husbandry that occurred concurrently in… Read more »

CapM
CapM
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

Doing a modest amount of research on a subject before presenting an opinion or statement as fact is advisable or a person might end up talking a lot of Aurochs.

As a starting point-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_agriculture

Eating meat whether by human ancestors three million years ago, Tyrannosaurus rex sixty million years ago or foxes last night is not an indication that any of them are livestock farming..

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

The neanderthals et al did not have access to the technology and scientific knowledge we now enjoy, so your comparison is ludicrous. You might as well argue that we should live in caves, because they did.

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  David J

But they DID eat meat and made tools to enable them to do so.

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

They also died at around 30 years old, so again your comparison is meaningless; the fat that certain species of hominids ate meat thousands of years ago is of no relevance today. . Anyway, given the sheer effort involved in catching and killing animals,it is probable that the greater proportion of their diet came from fruits and vegetables. The sterotypical “hunter-gatherer” is portrayed as a big over-muscled troglodyte carrying a club or a bow and arrow; in fact early humans should be called “gatherer hunters”, since their regular food supply came mostly from gathering vegetables and fruit. Apart from exceptional… Read more »

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

“fact” obvs.

Mawkernewek
Mawkernewek
2 months ago
Reply to  CapM

If we were to abandon agriculture and go back to hunting and gathering we’d have to reduce the human population very considerably.

CapM
CapM
2 months ago
Reply to  Mawkernewek

Who’s advocating that?

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Mawkernewek

Typical “reductio ad absurdam” argument; sadly far too prevalent in these days of poor educational standards.

Paul
Paul
2 months ago

Thank you for a sensible and realistic opinion.

Mawkernewek
Mawkernewek
2 months ago

I don’t have a problem with people who want to follow a vegan diet, I wish they well in seeking to have a healthy diet without animal products, which does require a bit more thought that simply vegetarian diets do but it is possible.
I don’t really appreciate however those who want to force veganism on us all, whether we want it or not. Make your arguments if you like, promote it if you want, but there is a minority who just want to short-circuit all that by forcing it upon us.

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Mawkernewek

Who is trying to “force” it on you, and from where does their power come, to enable them to do so? Just asking for a friend… You’re not a Brexit voter by any chance are you? They thought we were being “forced” to accept things we didn’t want, and look how that turned out.

David J
David J
2 months ago

Almost every statement made in this article is untrue, so I can’t be bothered to address them one by one. The future lies in lab-grown meat, vertical farming and forest farming, leaving the land for wildlife and for growing those crops that cannot be grown indoors. Regardless of the moral question, animal agriculture will be killed off by the changes needed to cope with climate change and economic forces; those whose view of farming is more influenced by Shaun the Sheep than reality, are in for a period of readjustment.

Brychan
Brychan
2 months ago
Reply to  David J

If what you say is true, then who feeds London?

David J
David J
2 months ago
Reply to  Brychan

London is fed in the same way as the rest of the UK; about 60% of food is grown in the UK, the rest is imported. This figure fluctuates from year to year due to factors like the state of the harvest, weather and climate heating (apples good this year, wheat not so much ), geopolitics (eg the war in Ukraine), and harvest or local political problems in exporting countries. I am sure you know this already, or if not you can look it up, so I am not going to do your homework. If you could turn your question… Read more »

Ioan Richard
Ioan Richard
2 months ago

Well said Daniel James. your name alone drew my attention. It was a Daniel James who wrote our famous “Calon Lan”. There is just one facet you omitted to strongly emphasise in culture in that most of our hill farms producing beef and lamb are farmed by Welsh speaking families. Most incoming city dwelling vegans do not appreciate that!

Paul
Paul
2 months ago

I expect I’ll get shot down in flames for this comment but. If we stop livestock farming but the population keeps rising how are we going to feed the crops required for feeding ourselves. As gardeners are aware there is only so much compost you can produce and muck really does the soil some good. Are we going to have to increase our use of chemical fertiliser?

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.