The Welsh diaspora has been abandoned

Dr Huw Evans
There is a need for a coherent and effective Welsh diaspora engagement strategy. Furthermore, this should have cross-party and stakeholder support.
In November 2025 I wrote that the Welsh Government had been found wanting on diaspora engagement. Events (or, more accurately, the lack of them) since then have confirmed that position. The Welsh Government diaspora engagement action plan lapsed at the end of 2025. It has not been replaced.
Defining the diaspora
We first need to define who we mean when talking about the diaspora. The Oxford English Dictionary refers to diaspora as people who have spread, or have been dispersed, from their homeland: e.g. Welsh people who are not now in Wales.
More depth is needed, especially about what is meant by ‘people’; we will return later to ‘homeland and ‘dispersal’.
Adapting the definition used in the Cornwall diaspora strategy, the Welsh diaspora could be described as Welsh people living outside Wales who are Welsh by birth, ancestry, or choice.
Welsh by birth is unproblematic; it is people born in Wales. Welsh by ancestry is straightforward when it comes to people whose parents or grandparents were born in Wales. Beyond that, possibly, it is not so clear.
However, ‘Welsh by choice’ is the default limb. It includes people with uncertain ancestry, those who grew up or studied in Wales, and individuals without prior ties to Wales who connect through marriage. ‘Welsh by choice’ might also apply to a Patagonia resident because of Welsh cultural connections.
This definition is favoured because it is inclusive and not ethnically constrained.
The Welsh action plan’s definition was flawed because it only covered people living outside the UK, missing Welsh people in other parts of the UK, such as London.
Diaspora value
I compare the diaspora to family, using ‘civil kinship’ for both diaspora and homeland populations. The diaspora is an extension of family, and this civil kinship can be valued for cultural, social, economic, or other reasons.
As to the benefits, the Cornish strategy refers to ‘diaspora capital’. It states that diaspora capital ‘come[s] in three flows – flows of people, knowledge and finance – which create different forms of diaspora capital. These are diaspora cultural, economic, human and social capital.’
As to potential economic benefits see, for example, Brain Drain to Brain Gain: Mobilising the Welsh diaspora as agents of economic change.
The civil kinship lens also enables a two-way exchange between the diaspora and homeland. This is important because it means that both sides of the kinship can benefit. Global Welsh estimates that the Welsh diaspora community is more than three million, meaning that the civil kinship community is over six million.
How is the diaspora to be engaged?
The diaspora can be engaged through the development of sustainable connections within the kinship. Social infrastructures or networks are an example. These connections can develop organically but not always. So, there must be some planning but working with, and not against, the efforts of others to facilitate those connections.
The Cornish strategy and Welsh action plan are examples of planning. The mission statement of the Cornish diaspora strategy illustrates this. It is to: ‘Establish a sustainable and inclusive foundational architecture and operational framework for engaging Cornwall’s diaspora, fostering meaningful connections that deliver lasting benefits for both Cornish communities at home and across the world.’
The strategy takes the mission forward and explains the detail about how it is envisaged the mission can be realised. Ireland is routinely cited as an example of successful engagement with its diaspora. Unsurprisingly, it has its own diaspora strategy.
The Welsh Government’s action plan excluded diaspora members within the UK but outside Wales. A unified diaspora strategy is needed to include all diaspora, whether based in the UK or abroad. This approach could integrate with the international strategy while also coordinating activities within the UK beyond Wales.
Why a strategy should be uncontroversial
The term ‘homeland’ can be interpreted as simply referring to Wales as a geographical area with which people identify, without suggesting any particular status.
Desiring to boost these capital flows between diaspora and homeland communities isn’t limited to those seeking Welsh independence; unionists, devolved, or federal supporters can also feel connected to the homeland within the UK.
A diaspora strategy can be created with broad political support and remain effective regardless of future Welsh Government changes. It should also involve collaboration with relevant stakeholders. By way of comparison, the Cornish strategy seems to be broadly ‘owned’ and supported by a range of interested parties.
Reducing ‘dispersal’
The diaspora dictionary definition refers to people dispersed from their homeland. Often this will be due to economic coercion through limited homeland opportunities. Engaging with the diaspora can help shape policies that reduce forced dispersal by leveraging diaspora capital; for instance, attracting investment that increases economic opportunities in the homeland.
What next?
There is a Senedd election in May and there should be cross-party commitment for a diaspora strategy irrespective of the election’s outcome. With the lapse of the action plan, effectively, the diaspora community has been abandoned. There must be a recommitment to that community, part of which can be done through a coherent and effective diaspora strategy.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


This is a fine article that raises an important point. Welsh Government, along with our business community, needs to embrace our diaspora to a much greater degree. There are untapped resources out there and we are missing a trick by not reaching out far more than we are currently doing. Scotland and Catalunya successfully incorporate their diasporas, so let us up our game and do likewise.
Well said.
Welsh and proud of it.
It’s odd that it didn’t include those currently living in other UK member-countries.
It’s even more odd that it makes no real reference to another diaspora – the disengaged segment of the Welsh population that currently reside within our borders. These are people who for a variety of reasons don’t really give a sh*t about their own country. Some are so well off that they will defer to the big picture be it global or just UK or EU wide and make no link at all between their personal fortunes and that of their country. At the other extreme you will find people who have been dealt a very poor hand by a… Read more »
Fair point. Which is why I emphasise that the diaspora – homeland relationship should be two-way. Relatedly, simply regarding the diaspora as economic ‘cash cows’ must be avoided. I am told that this has been a criticism levelled at the Cornish strategy in practice despite its fine words!
Perhaps it is that the people who work for the Council, and formerly the Local Enterprise Partnership, in the area of economic development are trying to look busy, in the aftermath of the end of European funding and the relatively smaller amount of Shared Prosperity Fund.
Two million Welsh Americans could be useful if the 26th works out well.
The 26th?
World cup qualifier semi
It is so frustrating how much potential Wales is being wasted by not taking its diaspora seriously. Countries like Ireland have shown how a confident, outward‑looking nation can build powerful economic, cultural and investment networks through an active diaspora strategy. Wales could and should be doing the same, if we had a government willing to treat the global Welsh community as a national asset. Unfortunately Welsh Labour are like a mafia, it is not in their interest to strengthen the Welsh economy, because who know people might start voting for other parties. Even Eluned Morgan herself recently admitted that Mark… Read more »
If organised properly, this is clearly a win-win situation for Wales. I hope the next Welsh Government re-sets this and as suggested includes the rest of the UK as well as the rest of the globe. Nor should it be seen simply as an investment grab; we have so much more to offer than that!
It may surprise you to know that in GlobalWelsh CIC, Wales has the most advance approach to ‘diaspora engagement for economic development’ anywhere in the world. We are being held back by the Welsh Governments lack of ambition or severe adversity to risk, to support a full scale engagement. Check out http://www.globalwelsh.com/connect.
No. The “diaspora” abandoned Wales (though perhaps some of those who abandoned Wales for the Gulf have had pangs of hiraeth recently). How much did “engaging the diaspora” by WG as a post Brexit strategy or GlobalWelsh actually achieve since 2012? “Gorau Cymro, Cymro oddi Cartref”? Unfortunately, Wales has image problems: a nice place to get away from it all, but not a place for the ambitious. Attempts to showcase Wales’ culture and heritage abroad get overshadowed by the existence of the British Council. Wales should invest in those committed to a better Wales rather than drifters.
Ireland wouldn’t be the second richest country in the world if it insulted everyone who celebrated an Irish connection.
If Plaid Cymru wins the next election, I hope they do a reset. As a Welsh innovator, having left Wales for lack of good job opportunities particularly in the intellectual property arena, I do miss Wales and would like to remain in contact with Wales beyond the usual family connections.
https://idiyas.com/inventor/christopher-donald-wood#google_vignette
These government programs fail time after time. They seem to be boondoggles for those who can be a part of it, they accomplish little, and then it is branded as a failure. Personally I have been disappointed by the lack of initiative, forethought, commitment, ambition, street-smarts and engagement of those in power. Examples of ideas that were never embraced include: 1. Assistance in major fundraising for the University of Wales. Offer spurned by the person in charge. 2. Design and finance offer for a major international resort spurned by two First Ministers without any research into cost benefit analysis. 3.… Read more »