Time to Change Tracks

Ben Wildsmith
The last legitimately elected and stable government we had was David Cameron’s ministry in 2015. Once that was undone by Brexit a year later, the country has been effectively ungovernable with traditional parties unable to reconcile their factions.
The resultant chaos of coalition, a deal with the DUP, and endless leadership changes has resulted in much of the electorate losing trust in the entire political class.
Last year’s Labour victory represented a last, desperate investiture of hope by voters that there could be a return to governance as we used to know it. Keir Starmer’s managerial style seemed to promise a steady hand. He, himself, promised a government that would ‘tread lightly’ through our lives, recognising that happy societies don’t want to be dominated by political concerns.
Friendly commentators like LBC’s James O’Brien sighed in relief as the ‘grown-ups’ took the wheel of the UK.
Just over a year later, in the wake of this week’s horrendous, antisemitic attack in Manchester, the new Home Secretary is drawing up plans to curtail protests.
Reactionary responses
The light touch that was promised has been superseded by a series of reactionary responses to unrest, epitomised by the baffling decision, in August, to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group.
This weekend, the police were under justified pressure to protect Jewish places of worship as a matter of priority. Instead, a great many of them were deployed to arrest and carry away 500 entirely peaceful protestors who were holding placards with the illegal words, ‘Palestine Action’ on them.
The mass arrests at these protests are the largest ever made for any reason in UK history. The numbers involved are too large to accommodate in police custody and reports from the forces involved suggest that exhausted and embarrassed officers are at the end of their tether because manhandling docile pensioners is not what they joined up to do.
There is a strictly limited number of people who are willing to risk arrest under terrorism legislation. The protestors trend older because people of working age risking their employment and travel prospects for the rest of their lives if they so criminalised.
Gaza
The regular protests against Israel’s behaviour in Gaza, on the other hand, are attended by many thousands of people and have been since the atrocities of October 7th two years ago. Since that time, pro-Israeli commentators, echoed by figures on the right like Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage, and, laughably, ‘Tommy Robinson’ have sought to delegitimise these protests as ‘hate marches’ and have them curtailed by legislation.
If, as seems likely, the Home Secretary is to accede to these demands, how are the police supposed to cope with the inevitable mass disobedience that will ensue? The government is signing cheques that its employees can’t cash. What’s next…the army?
The government’s predicament is of its own making. Its fundamental mistake was to waste the small window of tolerance it was granted by the public upon election.
A dull, doctrinaire Treasury insisted that reimposing George Osborne’s economics and effectively governing to the right of Boris Johnson would bear fruit over the course of the Parliament and allow it to loosen conditions in the economy later on.
The government hubristically believed it had breathing space that the country was unwilling to allow. By now, people should be putting their names down for council houses that will be ready next year; waiting lists in hospitals should be tumbling noticeably; potholes should be filled.
Bond markets
Instead of quaking before the bond markets, the government should have won genuine popular support that caused creditors to retreat in the knowledge that it would be in power for many years to come. Rachel Reeves should have drawn a clear distinction between borrowing for capital expenditure and running costs. A case could have been made for the rebuilding of the UK from which investors could have seen a return.
Instead, with goodwill exhausted, the government is now engaged in a rear-guard action against Reform UK to keep itself afloat. Lacking the moral authority to defend principles like the right to protest, or to request moderate language at protests, it is enacting Trumpian legislation as a matter of self-preservation.
It won’t work. Just as gestures towards the left like reversing the two-child cap on benefits will be seen as inconsistent pandering, these concessions to authoritarianism will come off as weak sauce to the voters they are aimed at.
The legislation, though, will remain, and that is why this government is becoming a danger to society.
The precedent set by proscribing Palestine Action, for instance, will be there to exploit for an incoming Farage government. Instead of having to overturn the settled way of doing things, Farage will find the structural work done for him by a Labour government in desperation to save its own skin.
In Caerphilly this week we have seen Reform UK mischaracterising the Nation of Sanctuary legislation in an attempt to baffle low-information voters. We’ve also seen Labour promoting a graph suggesting that a vote for it, and not Plaid Cymru, is the only way to stop Reform being elected.
Misleads
What else can we deduce from that other than Welsh Labour’s loyalty to itself means more to it than the likely dismantling of Wales as a distinct civic entity? As Reform peddles its lies against a background of Putinism and personal disgrace, our governing party misleads electors in the service of a Westminster leadership that impoverishes us as a matter of reflex.
There are nearly fours years to go before a scheduled Westminster election, and I fear that this government will have destroyed all constitutional barriers to a Trumpian government before then.
We, rightly, feel sheltered from the worst excesses of populism in Cymru. What self-governance we have has at least been conducted without calls for violence and repression. It’s no time to be diffident now, though.
Our Senedd and media must stand apart from the dystopia in Westminster and proclaim what we will not accept. That needs to start with the Welsh branch of the Labour Party finding the minerals it was founded upon and refusing to collude with Keir Starmer in selling our birthright for the illusion of victories in elections that are already lost.
Events are gathering pace, and many of them are subject to international pressure from hostile nations and malign individuals. If Cymru does not cohere to assert its distinct values now, we could find our nationhood erased in the tumult.
We have reached the point where Labour and Reform are riding the same train. It’s time to change tracks.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


That poster is an insult to the people of Caerphilly. Do they really expect voters to buy this? If my constituency was a two horse race between Labour and Reform on a FPTP setting then I would hold my nose and vote Labour. This is evident enough (if it was ever needed) that Labour prioritise their party over their country.
Yet another Labour lie on the side of that van. What it should say is that a vote for Labour risks letting Reform in. Plaid are ahead in the latest poll so Labour supporters should vote tactically for Plaid. Hopefully many will see the sense in that.
Well argued opinion article as usual Ben. Thank you. We are heading for a future governed by people with an inability to effectively govern. Most voters are disuaded from participating. That is true where I live in Trowbridge and St Mellons. Hardly one eighth of those eligible participated. Most voted for change. They got it. Our new councillor is silent and this appears to be how he will govern. Our existing councillors are not as visible as they were during the campaign. This doesn’t bode well and I feel sad and pessimistic for our present and future.
When Farage and Nathan Gill were in the European Parliament they were known for their laziness and their obnoxious attitudes. Nothing has change with Reform councillors seen as the most incompetent and uninterested of all elected members. But the media, or great swathes of it, are licking their lips at the prospect of a Farage-led administration in London. But before that they want to experiment on Cymru (because to most of them we are irrelevant). They think: “Let’s bamboozle everyone with 20mph scare stories and throw in the odd Stop The Boats slogan. That’s what the people of Caerphilly will… Read more »
At last, a well written report highlighting the serious situation facing Wales. Thank you. We only need to look at what is happening in the USA to anticipate how the UK might be governed under Reform. Migration would be addressed through measures similar to the ‘Rwanda Deal’, likely negotiated between Farage and Putin. The threat of deportation to Russia would serve as a strong deterrent to anyone considering entering the UK. However, for those who have campaigned for migration controls, be warned — it may not end there! Reform would be an authoritarian government The only two parties who care… Read more »
Gwlad is another arm (er, perhaps a little finger) of the Single Transferable Party: the Labour – Reform – Tory – LibDem unholy alliance. It is time we despatched the neoliberalist nonsense of these cowboys to the dustbin of history and build the country and society we want by meeting real needs – food, shelter, income, health and care, education. I support people, small business, small farmers, artisans, workers… the common sense that Farage, Starmer and Badenoch clearly don’t have. The mendacious lying of Reeves, Bailey and The City does not serve us! I would take the Plaid Cymru option,… Read more »
That poster is the standard scare tactic labour has used here for decades. Remember the warnings of ethnic cleansing if we voted for devolution made by Kim Howells and co. Labour have never cared for Cymru, just look at the attitude that Joe Stevens has shown to know they only care about Labour and not the people who voted for them.