Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

Vicar claims he needed supervision to know stealing was wrong

30 Aug 2025 5 minute read
The Reverend Ryan Forey. Photo via YouTube

James Downs, Mental health campaigner

 

Thou Shalt Bill Thyself Monthly

A Church in Wales tribunal into the Reverend Ryan Forey has concluded that a Cardiff vicar may have misunderstood the Ten Commandments, mistakenly reading “thou shalt not steal” as a matter for supervision and training.

The Reverend Ryan Forey, once hailed as a “talented and charismatic young priest,” awarded himself £300 a month for services he didn’t provide, and a further £500 a month to his wife as a Clergy Spouse Allowance. According to the tribunal, none of these payments were “legitimate expenses”, but they were, at least, very regular.

Mr Forey admitted the allegations and explained that the period in question had been a “particularly difficult time”, though most people going through a rough patch would be advised to try retail therapy or chocolate, rather than inventing a marital allowance scheme.

Supervision shortage blamed for sins of commission

The tribunal determined that the real issue faced by Mr Forey was not dishonesty, but an “absence of support, supervision and guidance.” You see, when left alone for too long, a priest may simply forget that expenses aren’t a form of free money and start helping themselves to cash.

Forey himself insisted that he thought the payments were legitimate, since he had “seen similar practices used in previous churches in England” – a defence that will no doubt reassure congregations everywhere. If applied more broadly, such an argument could justify almost anything: “Yes, I replaced ‘Thou shalt not steal’ with ‘Thou shalt not be seen stealing,’ but don’t worry, all the other priests are doing it!”

Critics have suggested that most adults can grasp the concept of fraud without direct coaching from a senior priest or bishop. But with the Church in Wales still reeling from safeguarding and financial scandals in Bangor that forced the archbishop to step down, it seems easier to reframe this case as a kind of “fraud by lack of mentoring” – a new ecclesiastical category in which sin is downgraded to a training need.

Let the Little Children Be Displayed Online

Not content with creative accounting, Mr Forey also developed an app that handily displayed the names of children attending his church, including those in care.

Despite being warned that this was a potential safeguarding disaster, he refused to remove it, perhaps confident that the Lord Himself covers all matters relating to GDPR. The tribunal concluded that what he really needed was a little more guidance, as though recognising that “don’t publish lists of vulnerable children online” is one of those tricky rules you only grasp after a short course.

The Feeding of the Five Thousand 

If the findings of the tribunal weren’t enough, financial accounts covering the year to 31 December 2022 (though only filed with the Charity Commission on 6 July 2024) reveal a thoroughly biblical approach to catering at Citizen Church.

Highlights include:

  • £6,100 on Alpha course catering, suggesting the feeding of the five thousand has been outsourced to Deliveroo.
  • £7,600 on “11 am service food and drink”, as the hallmark of a modern church is communion with canapés
  • £23,023 on Christmas and Easter services – enough to keep the congregation in smoked salmon blinis and champagne until Kingdom Come
  • Meanwhile, a coffee van installed in the church yard cost nearly £50,000 in 2022 alone, ensuring that the cup truly runneth over.

To Be Church™ or Not To Be Church™?

Alongside his main role at Citizen Church in Cathays, Mr Forey also set up a second congregation, boldly branded Be Church™. This went down very badly with the rival Christian group Don’t Be Church™, which complained that its entire doctrine of non-attendance had been plagiarised. Quite what Mr Forey was aiming for is unclear: a new denomination, a spiritual start-up, or perhaps an opportunity to test a new subscription model for eternal life?

In a rare act of bureaucratic restraint, the Church in Wales pointed out that running your own unsanctioned franchise church is not, in fact, allowed.

Forey, for his part, says he has learned from his mistakes and is eager to return to England to resume ministry. Whether his new flock will come with a financial chaperone or a fraud-prevention officer remains to be seen. Rumours have been heard in the pews of new products in the pipeline, such as Do Church™ and Try Church™, but so far the evidence favours Be Church Premium™, complete with ad-free worship and priority access to the collection plate.

Salvation by Supervision

After resigning in April 2024, Mr Forey spent what he called a “season of reflection and growth,” before taking to the well-known pulpit of Instagram where he posted the full tribunal judgement alongside a statement condemning “gossip, rumours and online trolling.” He added that Citizen Church had “grown big, grown fast, and got things wrong”- management-speak that would not look out of place in the annual report of a collapsed tech unicorn.

In the end, the tribunal stopped short of expulsion and instead issued a formal caution, requiring Mr Forey to undergo two years of supervision and safeguarding training. This means that, unlike ordinary mortals, priests are not expected to already know that fraud and data breaches are bad. 

This may not be the kind of accountability parishioners were hoping for, but it does at least offer reassurance that with the right “support and guidance,” clergy can eventually grasp the subtle difference between a side hustle and a stipend.

James Downs is a mental health campaigner, researcher and expert by experience in eating disorders. He lives in Cardiff and can be contacted at @jamesldowns on X and Instagram, or via his website: jamesdowns.co.uk


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve Thomas
Steve Thomas
3 months ago

And they wonder why there are more of us atheists every day when they have more or less condoned this fraud by not sacking him and making him face police charged for deception

J Jones
J Jones
3 months ago
Reply to  Steve Thomas

Religion and politics, the two fields that allow failures to increasingly attempt to take control of the lives of normal people.

Garry Jones
Garry Jones
3 months ago

This article alone makes my Nation subscription a steal. 
Sorry, I mean ‘…a good deal’. 

James Downs
James Downs
3 months ago
Reply to  Garry Jones

ha!

Erisian
Erisian
3 months ago

I thought ‘benefit of clergy’ was abolished under the Criminal Law Act 1827.!!!!

James Downs
James Downs
3 months ago
Reply to  Erisian

!! indeed!

Paul
Paul
3 months ago

With those expenses it does sound like he was being mentored… by a politician.

Baptist Trainfan
Baptist Trainfan
3 months ago

I’m puzzled by Ryan Forey’s claim that he was following practice he’d seen elsewhere i the Church of England, as in the CofE the fees for “occasional offices” such as weddings are shared between the local Church Council and the Diocese – the Vicar receives nothing. (Things are different in the CofE as the Vicar does receive a cut, but he seems to have specifically mentioned England).

James Downs
James Downs
3 months ago

Yes I am curious about the practices seen elsewhere – very odd

John Ellis
John Ellis
3 months ago

Not quite true: while there never has been any designated fee attached to baptism in the Anglican church in either Wales or England, there are specific set fees in respect of marriages and funerals and one of those is a personal payment to the priest.

The difference between Wales and England is that in Wales the priest is entitled to retain his fee as a sort of augmentation of his stipend, whereas in England he’s obliged to keep and to return a record of these fees, and his stipend for the following year is adjusted to take account of those.

Baptist Trainfan
Baptist Trainfan
3 months ago
Reply to  John Ellis

It’s a technicality, but I think you may be out of date with respect to the CofE. The Ecclesiastical Fees (Amendment) Measure 2011 replaced the Incumbent’s fee by a fee paid to the Diocesan Board of Finance. This may well be collected in the way you mention – I don’t know. Either way s/he doesn’t benefit personally so, if Rev Forey saw this happening, it was wrong.

John Ellis
John Ellis
3 months ago

If changes were made in 2011, I am indeed ‘out of date’! My connection with the Church of England ceased in 1994, so of course I wouldn’t be aware of any changes which might have been made in more recent times.

Anon
Anon
3 months ago

Having worked for Ryan forey I can say that these allegations only scratch the surface of his manipulative and abusive leadership style. The tribunal report offers him the option to ‘own’ these three ‘mistakes’ while remaining unaccountable for his general leadership flaws.

John Ellis
John Ellis
3 months ago
Reply to  Anon

My ‘take’ on this odd saga, for what it’s worth, is that it’s arisen as a consequence of something of a panic reaction on the part of church leaders to the phenomenon of the continual steep decline in the membership of their churches. This seems to have nudged them towards a nervy ‘let’s try anything’ strategy, and the phenomenon of the big ‘mega-churches’ in the USA, with their highly informal popular music style and emotional preaching, has tended to be the model attempted, simply because it has proved to be remarkably popular and successful over there. That does appear to… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by John Ellis
Anon
Anon
3 months ago
Reply to  John Ellis

There may not have been any massages but Ryan definitely favoured the starry eyed young women

John Ellis
John Ellis
3 months ago
Reply to  Anon

Maybe it’s a trait common to ‘edgy’ pastors!

David J
David J
3 months ago
Reply to  John Ellis

Isn’t that why they become pastors?

John Ellis
John Ellis
3 months ago
Reply to  David J

I doubt it. In my experience they do so – generally when they’re quite young and not really that mature – driven by an exuberant but genuine evangelical piety.

But if they find that they’re successful at it and draw an admiring following, that goes to their head. Or, arguably, maybe to other human instincts located rather lower than the head.

John Pockett
John Pockett
2 months ago

I posted this comment/question for the CinW on the original article on this story by Martin Shipton. I thought it might be useful here too: The very disturbing details of the Ryan Forey/Citizen Church scandal give rise to an extremely important question for the Church in Wales: surely such egregious conduct cannot be left merely as an internal Church in Wales Tribunal matter.  The continuing debacle in Bangor has shown the CinW to be totally incompetent at dealing with crises and allegations and, consequently, how can their internal procedures be trusted to mark its own homework, so to speak? The… Read more »

Anon
Anon
11 days ago

As someone who worked under Ryan’s “leadership”, I will say that anyone reading this thinking of getting him on your team… save yourself the devastation of how manipulative this guy truly is. The CiW tried to offer past and present staff counselling prior to this going public but this is after years of them being warned about what was going on at Citizen and responding by sharing confidential complaints with him and disclosing the names of those who has brought things up instead of safeguarding the one issuing the complaint. This truly goes far beyond the money. He’s been allowed… Read more »

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.