Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

With the world in chaos, and Britain adrift, standing up for Wales has a new urgency

14 Mar 2026 6 minute read
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Photo credit: Alberto Pezzali/PA Wire

Martin Shipton

For those who are sceptical about the British state, two recent developments provide convincing evidence that it is not functioning in the best interests of the people of Wales.

Keir Starmer’s version of muscular unionism takes us back to the 1970s, when hostility to the notion of political devolution was seen as a tenet of faith by a certain kind of Labour politician.

Such a position inevitably led to a situation where successive Conservative Secretaries of State ruled Wales in the same way as Governors General ran countries like Australia and India during the colonial era.

Welsh Office ministers answered parliamentary questions at Westminster, but there was little effective scrutiny of their actions and cronyism blossomed.

Together with the ravages to the Welsh economy during Thatcher’s premiership, concerns about the undemocratic nature of rule by Governors General led to rising demands, in the political class at least, for a devolved Welsh Assembly.

In 1997, by a small majority, and in 2011, by a large majority, two referendums resulted in the law-making Senedd we have now.

Over the years, the powers of what is now the Senedd accrued, although Wales continued to lag behind Scotland and in some cases Northern Ireland in the extent of devolution that took place.

For those who want to see the Senedd grow in terms of its responsibilities, it remains a grievance that the justice system and policing are areas reserved to Westminster.

Brexit, however, became a turning point as successive Tory UK governments decided to take for themselves powers that had previously been exercised by the devolved administrations, most notably the allocation and distribution of regional aid funds from the European Commission.

While Labour was in opposition at Westminster, it protested about such power grabs, but soon after its victory in the 2024 general election it became apparent that the UK Government wanted a major role in what had previously been a wholly devolved policy area.

The fact that economic development was, according to the devolution settlement, devolved was ignored by the current Labour UK Government in the same way as it was ignored by its Tory predecessor.

The leak to Plaid Cymru of Starmer’s email to his Cabinet colleagues from last December, in which he revealed that, so far as he was concerned, there was no parity of esteem between his government and those of the nations, demonstrated what had been apparent for some time.

Despite protestations to the contrary, it’s clear that Starmer believes there is nothing wrong with encroaching unilaterally on devolved responsibilities such as economic development. Indeed, it is apparent from his leaked email that he sees a positive virtue in doing so because he believes it gives him the opportunity to enhance the political capital of his own government.

Betrayal

This is a betrayal of devolution and Rhun ap Iorwerth was right to call it out. What is the point of devolving powers to the Senedd if the UK Government is going to undertake projects in parallel to it in devolved policy areas?

The UK and Welsh governments should not be competing with each other, but getting on with their own responsibilities. It is inconceivable that the Welsh Government would be permitted to set up rival courts in Wales, so why should it be acceptable for the UK Government to build infrastructure projects that should fall within the purview of the Welsh Government?

Unsurprisingly, most Labour MSs are shocked by this turn of events, not least because it undermines the successful brand that their party has built up in Wales: that Labour is standing up for Wales against centralising forces that would consign the nation even more to the margins of British politics.

The brand worked when the Tories were in power at Westminster, but the idea of a Labour Prime Minister sabotaging a carefully cultivated and successful political image is alienating and counter-productive. Votes will be lost in spadefuls.

U-turn

The U-turn on devolution – for that is what it amounts to – is more significant than Starmer simply pulling rank on what he sees as a bunch of Celtic Nationalist disrupters.

Many people who have severe reservations about the British state have been able to see the Senedd and the Welsh Government as bulwarks against the disturbing drift to the right in contemporary political discourse.

Starmer hasn’t succeeded in much, but he has managed to ensure that a high proportion of those who saw the accrual of extra powers by the Senedd as a good thing have now been alienated.

Meanwhile, the humiliating way in which Starmer manages to sound as if he’s sucking up to Trump even when he would like us to believe that he is adopting a more independent stance is another turn-off for those of a progressive disposition.

Simultaneously, he seeks to invoke a pathetic strand of imperial nostalgia by insisting on being filmed between two Union flags every time he makes an appearance in his office. Labour is supposed to be a party of the left.

People of the left that I know don’t want to be associated with the long-gone British Empire and its legacy of violence and oppression in those countries it conquered and plundered.

If they supported the continuation of the British state, they wanted it to shed its negative baggage and become committed to a more equal society where poverty was marginalised and in due course eliminated. None of that is compatible with signing up as an albeit halfhearted supporter of Trump’s wars.

Hogtied

In terms of its international approach, the UK Labour government is indistinguishable from its Tory predecessor. Hogtied by Brexit, Starmer offers little in the way of a progressive roadmap for the future (as contemporary jargon would put it).

Britain’s days of strutting the world stage as if it was an important world power with its own respected perspective on geopolitics have gone for good, and we are left with a shell of a state whose influence is negligible.

In these circumstances the way forward is surely to concentrate on making Wales the most successful nation it can be.

With the world in chaos, and Britain adrift, standing up for Wales has a new urgency.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alwyn Evans
Alwyn Evans
20 days ago

If Starmer moves an inch to assist Donald Trump in this illegal and ill-conceived war, he forfeits any chance he has of asserting the UK’s independence. Coupled with his cynical indifference to the devolution settlement and his blatant centrist activities to undermine devolution, he will stand condemned both as an USA lackey, and a reactionary and cynical traitor to the devolved governments of the UK

Keith Parry
Keith Parry
20 days ago

The last twenty years of London Government of Wales has been awful. Starmer is the latest in a long line of failed United Kingdom Prime Ministers. Britain’s Empire has been in decline since since the 1920s. It has declined like the Roman and Spanish Empires before it. Since 2008 this decline has seen economic stagnation and growing English nationalism. We in Wales need to escape from England’s sinking ship. We need national sovereignty ,to turn our economy round and we need it now. Small countries across Europe have prospered in the last twenty years while we decline. We can not… Read more »

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
20 days ago
Reply to  Keith Parry

Lifeboat Wales, an idea shared by many…

A reality in the fist of Clark of the Cinque Ports for the moment,

Others would place their claws around our neck and squeeze the life out of us…

Leigh Richards
Leigh Richards
20 days ago

I recall bursting into laughter upon reading early on in the tenure of this abject PM that he prided himself on draping a union jack in his living room (an admission made public no doubt to reassure those daily mail readers who’s votes the disgraced Morgan McSweeney believed labour should be chasing). But it stands to reason that any politician who wraps himself in a flag on which Wales isnt even represented will have utter contempt for Welsh devolution. And Starmer’s labour govt has acted accordingly – in the shape of last week’s shameful revelations of British govt overreach into… Read more »

Andy W
Andy W
20 days ago

We also need to learn from France. Globally EDF is everywhere, plus Alstom and Vinci. The French are excellent at networking and messaging. My consultancy works with Vinci, so I have completed their training courses – they use Rolls-Royce plc (I was a graduate there in 1990s) as a global exemplar of incompetence (bribery scandals). Plus French people holiday a lot in France. South-West Wales has a new engineering organisation – https://celtico.uk/ how could they expand? Transport for Wales has new trains, their profits would increase if more people travelled November to March, excluding school holidays for short breaks in… Read more »

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
20 days ago

There are those who wish to stand up for Wales, such as Plaid Cymru, and others who prefer to keep us down: Labour, the Conservatives, and Reform UK. #WelshNot ⛔

#VotePlaidCymruMay7th 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿#PuttingWalesInterestsFirst 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 #Ylmaen 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

Llond bôl
Llond bôl
19 days ago
Reply to  Y Cymro

Like you I want independence and I respect that there are different views on how an independent Wales should look. I’m supporting Gwlad. They are a party that wants to lead us to independence too, but I prefer their policies on public services to those of Plaid (too close to Labour’s which have largely failed). Time for a new vision. I hope Gwlad grow in status and support and I wish them all the best.

Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
20 days ago

This is what is truly ‘telling it as it is’, not as that phrase was attributed to its’ use by Trump/Johnson idiots. We are going through the excruciating spectacle of a dying British Empire killing itself with the very hatred it once exported around the globe which is now eating out its’ very own bone marrow. What we in Wales and Scotland can do to help this process along rather than prolong its’ agony is to tell the very slow Labour leaders in both countries to get with the programme, accept that they are finished and save both nations from… Read more »

Undecided
Undecided
19 days ago

But “what does standing up for Wales” actually mean in practice? Rhun ap Iorwerth can deliver a better speech than the Baroness; but it’s very doubtful whether it will achieve much as areas such as economic development are devolved in name only. All the real levers are at Westminster. Same story on child poverty and a host of other issues. PS Trump is a sideshow to this particular debate.

Alwyn
Alwyn
19 days ago
Reply to  Undecided

My comments get deleted if I say that! I’ve no idea what stand up for Wales means.
last week a load of politicians from snp and plaid got upset about Westminster controlling a small budget for installing flower pots and bus shelters around Wales. They didn’t get upset about the report which said that spending pressures are going to be extremely tough next senedd session and Welsh outcomes in health and education are worse than in England

Undecided
Undecided
19 days ago
Reply to  Alwyn

So far as I can see, an incoming Plaid government would seek a change to the Barnett formula; but haven’t defined what needs based alternative they want, have ruled out using devolved income tax powers and would almost certainly be rejected anyway because Scotland (doing nicely from Barnett) would lose out and the SNP would jump on it. Doesn’t really add up to much?

Alwyn
Alwyn
19 days ago
Reply to  Undecided

And also seek crown estate devolution (ironically cost neutral for wales as we don’t actually get much revenue from this- but suits their ‘exploiting resources’ narrative) and devolving policing and justice (ignoring the complex reasons it is devolved in Scotland and Northern Ireland). Oh and seek rail infrastructure devolution- ignoring that it was offered already but turned down as it would cost wales more money (though hs2 changed that), but same circumstances wil persist post 2035.
it’s not serious politics.

Undecided
Undecided
18 days ago
Reply to  Alwyn

You are correct on all three counts; but it doesn’t fit the political narrative as you say. What they want (or at least think they want) is the powers with some sort of financial safety net provided by Westminster. Not happening.

Blodwen
Blodwen
19 days ago

Mr Shipton on excellent form, as usual. “Simultaneously, he seeks to invoke a pathetic strand of imperial nostalgia by insisting on being filmed between two Union flags every time he makes an appearance in his office.” Bang on.

kevin rayner
kevin rayner
19 days ago

now is the time to vote labour out of power in the fortcoming may election

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.