Mirror newspaper labels Owain Glyndŵr a ‘warlord’

Stephen Price
An article in the Mirror newspaper has claimed that Wales’ new national park is to be named after ‘a rebel warlord’ in reference to Owain Glyndŵr, the last native prince of Wales.
The column followed reports about a consultation on Wales’ newest national park on 15 September, and claims that “a new national park in Wales will be ‘riskily’ named after a rebel warlord who slaughtered English troops”.
The article written by Paul Horton continues: “A public vote found 49% want the beauty spot in north-east Wales to be named Glyndwr, after Owain Glyndwr.
“The last native Prince of Wales led a 15-year Middle Ages campaign against Henry IV and is a hero to nationalists in Wales.
“A Natural Resources Wales report had warned: “Glyndŵr is closely associated with desire for independence.
“There would therefore be a risk that naming the park after Glyndwr would lead to accusations of a pro-nationalist bias.”
“Glyndwr (1349-c.1415) seized Conwy Castle in 1401 before he rallied 400 troops who charged 1,500 English and Flemish soldiers, killing 200 and taking the rest prisoner.
“He went on to form the first Welsh parliament.”
‘Anglocentrism’
An image of the article was shared by Plaid Cymru Councillor, Elfed Wyn ap Elwyn and received widespread-backlash from his followers.
Winston Evans wrote: “A jingoistic, imperialist Englishman’s Warlord is a proud, defiant Cymro’s Freedom Fighter.”
Iori Hughes commented: “One man’s warlord is another man’s freedom fighter.”

While Evan Owen added: “The biggest insult isn’t being discussed, yet more of our land being turned into an English theme park! More soft eviction and voluntary resettlement, more undemocratic government. Deffrwch!”
The article comes as people across Wales marked Owain Glyndŵr Day on Tuesday 16 September – a celebration of Owain Glyndŵr, the last native Prince of Wales and founder of the first Welsh parliament.
On 16 September every year, thousands in Wales celebrate the life and legacy of the “rebel” Prince of Wales.
Owain ap Gruffydd, commonly known as Owain Glyndŵr was a Welsh leader who led a long-running war of independence to end English rule in Wales during the Late Middle Ages. He formed the first Welsh parliament, and he was the last native-born Welshman to hold the title Prince of Wales.
Rising
Owain Glyndŵr was a descendant of the Princes of Powys through his father Gruffudd Fychan II. Through his mother, Elen ferch Tomas ap Llywelyn, he was a descendant of the Princes of Deheubarth, also a descendant of Llywelyn the Great of the House of Aberffraw.
On 16 September 1400, Owain Glyndŵr proclaimed himself Prince of Wales and instigated a 15-year Welsh Revolt against the rule of King Henry IV of England.
His troops inflicted a series of defeats on the English forces and captured key castles across Wales, rapidly gaining control of most of the country. Glyndŵr received naval support from Scotland and Brittany and also received the support of King Charles VI of France.

In 1403 a Welsh army including a French contingent, commanded by Owain Glyndŵr, his senior general Rhys Gethin and Cadwgan, Lord of Glyn Rhondda, defeated a large English invasion force reputedly led by King Henry IV himself at the Battle of Stalling Down in Glamorgan.
By 1404 four English military expeditions had been repelled and Owain solidified his control of Wales. He was officially crowned Prince of Wales (Welsh: Tywysog Cymru) and held a parliament at Machynlleth where he outlined his national programme for an independent Wales, which included plans such as building two national universities, re-introducing the traditional Welsh laws of Hywel Dda, and establishing an independent Welsh church. There were envoys from other countries including from France, Scotland and the Kingdom of León (in Spain).
Overpowered
Despite the initial success of the revolt, in 1407 the superior English resources and wealth began to turn the tide; by 1409 the English forces had reconquered most of Wales. Glyndŵr was cornered and besieged at Harlech Castle, but he managed to escape by disguising himself as an elderly man, slipping past the enemy at night.
He retreated to the wilderness with a band of loyal supporters, continuing the war with guerrilla tactics throughout Wales and the English borderlands.
The last documented sighting of him was in 1412 when he ambushed the King’s men in Brecon, capturing a leading supporter of King Henry’s. Owain twice ignored offers of a pardon from the new king Henry V of England. Despite the large rewards offered for his capture, Glyndŵr was never betrayed. Whilst it isn’t known for sure, one theory suggests that he died in the year 1415, at the age of approximately 56.
With his death, Owain has acquired mythical status along with Cadwaladr, Cynan and Arthur as a folk hero awaiting the call to return and liberate his people, Y Mab Darogan (The Foretold Son).

Petition
A petition urging the Welsh Government to purchase, Owain Glyndwr’s ancestral home in Montgomeryshire was discussed in the Senedd back in September 2023.
The petition launched by Elfed Wyn ap Elwyn called for the purchase of the site in order to safeguard it for future generations gained over 10,000 signatures – crossing the necessary threshold for a debate in the Senedd.

Nestled in countryside of north Montgomeryshire, south of the village of Llansilin, it was the manorial home of the princes of Powys Fadog and the home, and most probably the birthplace, of Owain Glyndŵr – the last native-born Welshman to hold the title Prince of Wales, who led a led a 15 year-long Welsh War of Independence in the late Middle Ages.
The site, featured in Iolo Goch’s poem, ‘Llys Owain Glyndŵr’, was burned to the ground in May 1403 by the English prince, Henry, during Glyndŵr’s Uprising.
Sycharth is a scheduled monument protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, and currently in private ownership with visitor access by agreement with the Llangedwyn Estate. The site has previously received funding from the Welsh Government’s historical environmental service, Cadw.

And earlier this week, the first image and audio of Michael Sheen as Owain Glyndŵr premiered to publicise Gary Owen’s epic new play Owain & Henry which is set to run at Wales Millennium Centre in November 2026.
The Welsh National Theatre production of Owain & Henry by Gary Owen, will see the playwright breathing life into the 15th century rebellion against the English crown by the outlaw Owain Glyndŵr. Michael Sheen will play the last Welsh-born Prince of Wales, clashing with King Henry IV in a battle which could lead to freedom for Wales and the end of England.
Speaking when the production was originally announced, Michael Sheen said: “The vision of Welsh National Theatre is writ large through these first two productions. Owain & Henry is one of the origin stories of our nation, as relevant in today’s complex world as it was when Glyndŵr declared Wales an independent nation six hundred years ago. Gary Owen’s play is one of the most ambitious Welsh plays I’ve read; and is the biggest and boldest of Gary’s career. That’s the creative benchmark and ambition we want to set with Welsh National Theatre.
“Playing the iconic Welsh prince on one of Europe’s biggest stages in our capital city will, I hope, be a defining moment for us as a people, and a culture. This is what Welsh National Theatre is all about.”
Tickets for the Welsh National Theatre and Wales Millennium Centre co-production will go on sale to Wales Millennium Centre Partner and Partner Awen Members from 3 November, Ffrind and Ffrind+ Members from 5 November, Groups 10+ from 6 November, and to the general public from 7 November 2025.
Visit www.wmc.org.uk/owain+henry for information.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Of course we forget that all English ‘heroes’ were as innocent as the day is long. If Owain Glyndŵr ever ‘slaughtered’ English troops he did so to protect the Cymry against an evil English army who came here with soldiers, 20-1 in their favour, to steal more land and wipe out the population. Everything the English have ever done involves killing and stealing.
They still do this to this day, they call it banks and poltics
A NRW report warned ‘Glyndwr is closely associated with a desire for independence’. What about the Second Seven Crossing being named the ‘Prince of Wales Bridge’ a title closely associated with the subjugation of the Welsh people! I’m tired of this colonial nonsense, how much longer are we going to put ourselves through this?
Yes, I think we are all tired of this continual dominance of one country over another over something that happened nearly 800 years ago. It’s time to grow balls and tell them to get stuffed.
100%. To be fair, we shouldn’t expect anything different from English media. They’ve never been any different when it comes to jingoistic nonsense, and though some might hide it better than others, deep down they’re all the same. We really need Welsh media to be written, filmed, etc by Welsh people with Welsh interests at heart. This site here is a positive step forward, btw.
Not just the media but the english themselves. Try going to England and mentioning where you live, then listen to the ignorant prejudices,”jokes” and bigotries as they spew forth from even well-educated people. For far too many english, Cymru is just another county of england, where the people talk funny and are charming, as long as they know their place and don’t start talking about economic equality and independence, or remind the english of their part in ravaging Cymru for hundreds of years.
I am Welsh and have two English son in law’s and never have a problem when I go to England,I think all the posters on here negative towards the English need to stop living in the past and grow up and get a life!
Your sons in law are not going to say anything insulting to your face are they? What they say to their mates when you are not around however…
For your information both have Welsh friends and both have never said a bad word about any of them, unlike you.
Yeah, that’s straight out of the “some of my best friends are black” school of thought. The fact that you have two family members who as far as you are aware have not been prejudiced against Cymru, does not negate my premise that many english do exactly that.
You need to grow up.
Perhaps the bridge is named in memory of Owain Glyndwr? XD
Whole of Wales is on the bring of getting rid of English rule, just media keep whit washing the king thing but we all know what that firm is and how they linked to epstein and hollywood etc
It’s time to boycott all reach.plc titles inc the western mail they are in financial difficulties hopefully they will go bust soon
Good comment Andrew, I don’t know of anyone who reads the Wasting Mule in this day and age.
Someone’s auditioning for a gig at the Telegraph.
Stopped just short of calling him a terrorist then.
Warlord is a deliberate choice of term to slight, in my view. We aren’t talking dark ages borderline tribal warfare here, it was a major national revolution against an oppressive occupying foreign state. The 15th century wasn’t an age of competing warlords on this island, those days were in the past.
They forget who invaded who. Owain Glyndŵr was a freedom fighter with a just cause. He fought against an adversary who invaded killed and oppressed his people. Calling him a warlord implies that he was a terrorist. He was not. Take a long hard look in the “Mirror” England. You might not like what you see. Fact over fallacy. Anyway, England only exists because their Germanic Saxon ancestors stole our land. Then in 927AD created the English state when the numerous thiefdoms unified under one king with Æthelstan. And it was Welsh Monk Gildas of Hen Ogledd, father of British… Read more »
Would Paul Horton object to a Ukrainian National Park being renamed in Volodymyr Zelensky’s honour a few years from now because he led a country who’s army killed soldiers from a larger bully-boy neighbour who’d invaded and occupied his country’s land? Would he call Zelensky a warlord? Perhaps Horton thinks its different when the larger bully-boy neighbour is England!!
Buddig (Boudicca) resisted Roman oppression and slaughtered thousands of Roman occupiers,and she gets a monumental statue in the centre of London, in an attempt by the Anglo-Saxons to claim credit for the actions of a Celtic freedom fighter. In contrast, Owain Glyndwr is denigrated as a “warlord” for resisting oppression in the same way. Can anyone with half a brain take this Mirror rubbish seriously?
This new park is essential to prevent any grand scale development. We don’t want to be the new Bradford or Leicester because of the over crowding I England.
At the end of the day he was fighting for freedom for his people i nearly chocked on my toast when i read he murdered English i think its the other way around and as i have said many times ENGLAND HAS NO RIGHT TO RULE ANOTHER COUNTRY AS IT WAS BY CONQUEST
The English have no identity, so they seek to define themselves by who they (wrongly) feel superior to, whether immigrants, asylum seekers, or The Cymru, Irish and Scots. The recent epidemic of flag waving is proof of their pathetic insecurity. When the celtic countries achieve independence the english will be forced to grow up. Let’s not put up with this ignorant abuse any longer!
Sorry, I mean the Cymry, oops!
It’s those people in England who own second homes in Gwynedd and Ynys Mon I feel sorry for. They’ll have to travel through the Glyndwr National Park, and this could trigger awful historical memories about this “warlord”. Why don’t we think of our friends to the east of Offa’s and label it the William Wales National Park or the Princess Kate National Park. You know, something respectful and non-controversial.
Maybe they would feel less threatened if we renamed the long-distance path “Glyndwr’s Way” ? Perhaps “Brighton Promenade” or “Piccadilly” would make them feel more at home?
They can hardly complain after hilariously arranging for the first Eurostar trains from Paris to terminate at Waterloo.
Please don’t give them any ideas.
The Scots have William Wallace, the English have Winston Churchill. Did they have 21st century values? No!! So what is wrong with Wales having Owain Glyndwr as its national hero? I guess the key difference is Welsh history has never been glamorised by Hollywood like English, Scottish, and Irish history have been!
Come on Michael Sheen, we need the film!
The BBC aren’t any help either, their version of “british” history seems to begin with ‘enery the eighth. There’s never an historical programme factual or otherwise that doesn’t link back at some point to the English aristocracy/monarchy or some other English person of note or an event that took place on English soil. Even Portillo in the present day, excellent presenter though he is simply cannot resist deferring back to an English connection wether past or present when presenting an article on his railway journeys in the UK or abroad. This complete lack of historical (and contemporary) representation is one… Read more »
I’m more worried that people class the mirror as a “newspaper”
I grew up with Mirror-reading parents, I haven’t read it for years but I always assumed it was at least sympathetic to the left, at least as far as tabloid papers go. That they can publish this neo-imperialist rubbish shows how far the overton window has shifted.
I think it’s due to the umbrella company that now owns them.
My hamsters are OK with it!
The senedd is ours in May, Glyndwr may ride again…
Gobeithio!
Do they not realise that some of their own “heroes” such as the “conqueror” and Edward I slaughtered people in battle and razed towns to the ground? Are they really that ignorant of their own history?
Owain Glyndwr was fighting for independence and against colonialism of his country. What exactly are the oppressed supposed to do in those circumstances? Would they call Gandhi or Zelenskyy a “warlord”?
Talking about Owen Glyndwr and Henry V, try telling the English about the Welsh archers who won the Battle of Agincourt, and watch them splutter in outrage…
I think people might be taking the term warlord the wrong way. He was a military commander first and foremost and he rule not through diplomacy, but through force using military command to seize many of his objectives. It’s true there was more to him than just being a warlord, but just to reiterate that having a ‘legitimate claim’ or ‘popular support’ doesn’t make someone not a warlord. War was very much his thing and he saw that as pretty much the only way to build Wales into a nation state. Now in all fairness, he was probably correct in… Read more »
Which people who are considered heroes of England are described as warlords?.
Alfred the Great King of Wessex Lady of the Mercians (equal representation!) Oswald of Northumbria King of Northumbria Penda of Mercia King Arthur (assuming he existed) was/is considered a warlord King Cnut Harold Godwinson Sir John Hawkwood (Mercenary Captain) Sir Hugh Calverly (Mercenary Captain) 4th Earl of Chester Ranulf de Gernon 1st Earl of Gloucester, Robert 14th Earl of Warwick Richard Neville Prince Rupert of the Rhine (commander under Charles I) King Richard the Lionheart, was basically THE warlord king. Basically, it applied to a lot of people, it’s more a way of describing ‘how’ someone governs. I don’t think… Read more »
Although the term ‘warlord’ can be used to describe a lot of individuals my point was that it is not applied by the English to those considered by them to be English heroes.
From the list you provided, [some of which would be ‘pointless’ or very close if subject to suggestions by the public for that TV show].
King. Lady, King, King, Arthur called King because it suited Norman claims, King, King, Knight/Sir, Knight/Sir, Baron,?, Kingmaker, Prince, King/Lionheart/warrior king [which does not have the same connotation as warlord].
The labels above are the ones in general use and not ‘warlord’.
I have never read of or heard the term “warlord” applied to any leader in English history, ever.
The English need to seriously look into the mirror and examine its colonial history on who constitutes a warlord or hero in conflict.
Owain Glyndwr and the Cymry versus an invading English army. Similar to Israel and Palestine today, many media outlets seem to be confused about who the real bad guys are…
I love England.
Ah, bless!
He was a true welsh hero. This in a time when a welshman could not own a blade of grass in his own country and was used by its Norman/English overlords. Women and children were often rounded up by these overlords and sent to work in the fields and lands of these overlords in England. Glyndwr was a loyal follower of the king and fought on his behalf in France and other conflict areas. He fought against the king as a last resort due to politics at the time. As a result he ran the various english forces a merry… Read more »
Owain is in my family tree, my hen daid was Madog ap Maredudd, GWYNEDD were our biggest enemy and threat, Madog fought with the king of england at that time, and it was the king of england who gave him his lands back…..hence why Powys is the largest county in Wales! My 14th Great Grandfather was a welsh archer and fought against glyndŵr. Know your history before you slam the english….yet again.
Chwarae teg i ti!
‘My 14th Great Grandfather’
Given the incidents of illegitimacy that occur within everyone’s lineage it’s impossible to say.
You may be descended from someone who fought against Glyndwr or someone who fought for Glyndwr or from both or from neither.
We are not “slamming” the english, we are criticising english arrogance and imperialism, and their peculiarly one-sided view of history. Those english who not only respect the history and culture of Cymru, and (more to the point) are willing to learn something about it, are welcome here. By the way, if you have studied your family tree, you should know that there is no proving who the fathers were in each generation; a name on a birth certificate proves nothing, and these certificates only began in 1836 anyway. Therefore you can only take the female line as accurate. Who knows… Read more »
He was a lord. He went to war. As lords were wont to do.
But this is still definitely cymrophobia
Heck, mirror still going, thought that properganda racist company had closed down, who heck still reads or listens to them lot at the mirror they as bad as the sun news paper being able to count to 10 without missing 7,8,9 if you read them you best prob agreeing bubbling borris was educated like normal folk